Skip to content
Ashland Hospital Corporation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Ashland Hospital Corporation

To provide community healthcare services.

$610k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$92k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$729kArts & Culture$422kFood & Nutrition$206kHuman Services$177kHealth$137kRecreation & Sports$111kCommunity Improvement$94kHousing & Shelter$68kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 15 grants below total $242,542, the rows itemized in this filing. The $609,933 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $367,391 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $117k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $92k
$7,100
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION OF ASHLAND INC$91,550
COMMUNIITY ASSISTANCE AND REFERRAL SERVICES (CARES) INC$32,942
NEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS$32,000
SAFE HARBOR OF NORTHEAST KENTUCKY$19,100
HIGHLANDS MUSEUM AND DISCOVERY INC$12,500
ASHLAND AREA YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION$10,000
SHAPING OUR APPALCHIAN REGION INC (SOAR)$10,000
ASHLAND ALLIANCE CORP DBA NORTHEAST KENTUCKY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$7,100
PARAMOUNT ARTS CENTER INC$6,000
SUMMER MOTION INC$6,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$5,000
ASHLAND ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC$5,000
RIVER CITIES HARVEST$3,250
ASHLAND COMMUNITY KITCHEN$2,000
UNITED WAY OF NORTHEAST KENTUCKY$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $46k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 15%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 15%NEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS: $7k → 18%NEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS: $6k → 18%NEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS: $6k → 18%NEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS: $6k → 18%NEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS: $6k → 18%NEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS: $6k → 18%NEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS: $5k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Ashland Hospital Corporation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 94% of the giving stays in KY; by stated purpose, 90%.

Ashland Hospital Corporationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 18 repeat orgs$152k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
11

Total granted

$1.9M
$147k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+31%

Still filing today

89%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementEducationHealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    COMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION OF ASHLAND INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $695k · revenue +144% · 42% of their budget
  • AC
    ASHLAND COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $131k · revenue +6%
  • NH
    Neighbors Helping Neighbors Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $108k · revenue +118%

Funded once

  • TA
    THE ASHLAND PUTNAM STADIUM RESTORATION FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue -68% · 31% of their budget
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • JC
    JOHNSON COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
    one grant, 2022 · $27k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Build Ashland Inc

To provide community support for activities and improvements in ashland ky

Community Improvement
2
Ashland Area Chamber of Commerce

Business league

—
3
Ashland Community Enterprises

Operation of a historical tourist attraction

Arts & Culture
4
Ashland Senior Community Centerinc

Providing services to the elderly

Community Improvement
5
Ashland Community Foundation

To improve the quality of life in the ashland area, through, but not limited to the promotion, encouragement and support of education, health and well-being of families & individuals, preservation of nature, history, and the promotion of…

Philanthropy
6
Associated Charities of Ashland Ohio Inc

To provide short-term emergency financial assistance to the people in ashland county in the way of utilities, shelter, medication, pre-approved doctor and dental visits, and gasoline vouchers to doctor appointments out of town.

Human Services
7
Housing Partners of Ashland County Inc

Assisting ashland county residents in need of secure, safe, affordable housing through rentals, renovations, and/or new homes.

—
8
Ashland County Historical Society

To preserve the history of ashland county, ohio, and to provide educational opportunities to read about and experience said history and heritage.

Arts & Culture
9
Ashland Foundation

To make contributions which are used to support the social and economic impact in the local community.

Philanthropy
10
Ashland Christian Health Center Inc

The ashland christian health center exists to holistically care for and elevate the dignity of ashland county residents who are uninsured or under-insured in a christ-centered atmosphere.

Health
11
Ashland Regional Ballet Inc

To bring dance (ballet, jazz, and tap) as a performing art to the community and surrounding area using amateur and contract dancers, and to teach students ballet, jazz, and tap dance.

—
12
Soky Marketplace Inc

The purpose of gateway farmers market, inc. is to provide healthy, fresh food and horticultural products in south central kentucky and surrounding areas.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Foundation for the Tri-State Community Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Ashland Putnam Stadium Restoration Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
12/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HIGHLANDS MUSEUM & DISCOVERY CENTER INC: $326,692 · OtherHIGHLANDS MUSEUM & DISCOVERY CENTER INCASHLAND COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC: $130,786 · OtherASHLAND COMMUNITY KITCHEN INCPARAMOUNT ARTS CENTER INC: $110,966 · OtherPARAMOUNT ARTS CENTER INCCOMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY: $90,000 · OtherCOMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKYSAFE HARBOR OF NORTHEAST KY INC: $59,700 · OtherSAFE HARBOR OF NORTHEAST KY INCUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY: $30,000 · Other+13 more: $113,465 · Other+13 moreCOMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION OF ASHLAND INC: $694,650 · EducationCOMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATI…THE ASHLAND PUTNAM STADIUM RESTORATION FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · EducationTHE ASHLAND PUTNAM STADIUM RESTORATION F…SHAPING OUR APPALACHIAN REGION INC: $53,827 · Community ImprovementRIVER CITIES HARVEST INC: $44,729 · Community ImprovementASHLAND ALLIANCE CORPORATION: $36,208 · Community ImprovementASHLAND ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Community ImprovementNeighbors Helping Neighbors Inc: $107,769 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $9,500 · Human ServicesCommunity Assistance Referral Service Inc: $72,942 · EmploymentUnited Way of Northeast Kentucky: $60,924 · PhilanthropyFOUNDATION FOR THE TRI-STATE COMMUNITY INC: $6,000 · PhilanthropySUMMER MOTION INC: $51,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$861,609Education$744,650Community Improvement$144,764Human Services$117,269Employment$72,942Philanthropy$66,924Recreation & Sports$51,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY AND TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION OF ASHLAND INC: $694,650 over 6y, 42% of budgetHIGHLANDS MUSEUM & DISCOVERY CENTER INC: $326,692 over 7y, 22% of budgetASHLAND COMMUNITY KITCHEN INC: $130,786 over 9y, 17% of budgetPARAMOUNT ARTS CENTER INC: $110,966 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetNeighbors Helping Neighbors Inc: $107,769 over 9y, 14% of budgetCommunity Assistance Referral Service Inc: $72,942 over 3y, 13% of budgetUnited Way of Northeast Kentucky: $60,924 over 8y, 6.2% of budgetSAFE HARBOR OF NORTHEAST KY INC: $59,700 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetSHAPING OUR APPALACHIAN REGION INC: $53,827 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetSUMMER MOTION INC: $51,000 over 7y, 6.5% of budgetTHE ASHLAND PUTNAM STADIUM RESTORATION FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetRIVER CITIES HARVEST INC: $44,729 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetASHLAND ALLIANCE CORPORATION: $36,208 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetASHLAND AREA YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOC: $21,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSCIOTO COUNTY AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY: $14,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetASHLAND ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $9,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKING'S DAUGHTERS HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR THE TRI-STATE COMMUNITY INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBELLEFONTE COUNTRY CLUB: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPATHWAYS INC: $3,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pallottine Foundation…Nisource Charitable F…United Way of Northea…Peoples Bank Foundati…American Electric Pow…Bon Secours Kentucky …Foundation for the Tr…Blue Grass Community …The Blackbaud Giving …Amazonsmile Foundation
Pallottine Foundation of Huntington West VirginiaWV17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pallottine Foundation of Huntington West Virginia · Nisource Charitable Foundation · United Way of Northeast Kentucky · Peoples Bank Foundation · American Electric Power Foundation · Bon Secours Kentucky Health System Foundation Inc · Foundation for the Tri-State Community Inc · Blue Grass Community Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ashland Hospital Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ashland Hospital Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ashland Hospital’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home