Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Bon Secours Kentucky Health System Foundation Inc

The mission is to bring compassion to health care and to be good help to those in need, especially those who are poor and dying.

$134k
Granted FY2019
1
Grants FY2019
1
States reached
$77k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172019.

Health$1.2MPhilanthropy$30kArts & Culture$17kFood & Nutrition$15kMembership Benefit$10kEducation$10kReligion$8kRecreation & Sports$5k
02FY2019 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $77,473 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $133,925 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $56,452 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$77,473
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Our Lady of Bellefonte Hospital Inc$77,473
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–19) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Our Lady of Bellefonte Hospital Inc: $77k → 16%Russell Independent Schools: $10k → 16%OUR LADY OF BELLEFONTE HOSPITAL INC: $798k → 18%Our Lady of Bellefonte Hospital Inc: $301k → 18%United Way of Northeast KY: $25k → 18%HOLY FAMILY: $8k → 18%Paramount Arts Center: $6k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 3 repeat orgs$70k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of -17% since the first grant, against -28% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2019, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
7

Total granted

$1.2M
$70k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-17%
-28%

Still filing today

67%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
Community ImprovementPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OL
    Our Lady of Bellefonte Hospital Inc
    3× · 2017–2019 · $1.2M · revenue -64%
  • MC
    MEMBERS CHOICE CREDIT UNION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $10k · revenue +154%
  • SM
    SUMMER MOTION INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $10k · revenue -17%

Funded once

  • UW
    United Way of Northeast Kentucky
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue -28%
  • AI
    ASHLAND IN MOTION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $11k · revenue -100%
  • RI
    RUSSELL INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2017 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ashland Main Street Association

Organize and revitalize the ashland community

Community Improvement
2
Ashland Area Chamber of Commerce

Business league

3
Downtown Morehead Inc

Promotion of downtown morehead ky

Community Improvement
4
Ashland Community Enterprises

Operation of a historical tourist attraction

Arts & Culture
5
Madisonville Community Urban Redevelopment Corporation

Advancing Madisonville through inclusive comprehensive community development

Philanthropy
6
Ashland Chamber of Commerce

Promotion of business and tourism for City of Ashland

7
Murray Calloway Edc

To provide community and economic development services to the murray and calloway county kentucky areas.

8
Revitalize Russell Inc

To promote the growth revitalization and beautification of downtown russell ky

Community Improvement
9
Sumter Museum

Operation of county museum and preservation of museum assets

Arts & Culture
10
Fohs Hall Inc

To provide for the preservation, maintenance and operation of fohs hall as a civic center and community auditorium in marion, ky

Arts & Culture
11
Rockcastle Hospital & Respiratory Care Center Inc

Rockcastle hospital is organized to provide medical care to members of its community. the hospital has a policy of accepting all patients within its primary service area regardless of ability to pay. mission: rockcastle hospital and…

Health
12
Build Ashland Inc

To provide community support for activities and improvements in ashland ky

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Paramount Arts Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Ashland Putnam Stadium Restoration Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Our Lady of Bellefonte Hospital Inc — $1,177,252 · OtherOur Lady of Bellefonte Hospital Inc+4 more — $34,065 · OtherUnited Way of Northeast Kentucky — $25,000 · PhilanthropyASHLAND IN MOTION INC — $11,000 · Community ImprovementRIVER CITIES HARVEST INC — $5,000 · Community ImprovementSUMMER MOTION INC — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsNEW VENTURE FUND — $5,050 · EnvironmentTHE ASHLAND PUTNAM STADIUM RESTORATION FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · Education
Other$1,211,317Philanthropy$25,000Community Improvement$16,000Recreation & Sports$10,000Environment$5,050Education$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOur Lady of Bellefonte Hospital Inc — $1,177,252 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetUnited Way of Northeast Kentucky — $25,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetASHLAND IN MOTION INC — $11,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetMEMBERS CHOICE CREDIT UNION — $10,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPARAMOUNT ARTS CENTER INC — $5,915 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND — $5,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ASHLAND PUTNAM STADIUM RESTORATION FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 38% of budgetRIVER CITIES HARVEST INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ashland Hospital CorporationKY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ashland Hospital Corporation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bon Secours Kentucky Health System Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph