· Private foundation
Arthur Vining Davis Foundation #2
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k25 grants · $82k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $121k
- $50k–250k12 grants · $1.9M
- $250k+6 grants · $2.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WETA | $500,000 |
| WGBH EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION | $400,000 |
| UC BERKLEY GEATER GOOD SCIENCE CENTER | $314,868 |
| FRED ROGERS PRODUCTIONS | $300,000 |
| ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MT SINAI CT | $300,000 |
| RITA AND ALEX HILLMAN FOUNDATION | $250,000 |
| HILLEL INTERNATIONAL | $200,000 |
| BRAVER ANGELS | $200,000 |
| INTERVARSITY CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIPUSA | $184,000 |
| HETERODOX ACADEMY | $180,000 |
| AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LEARNED SOCIETIES | $177,500 |
| NEIGHBORLY FAITH | $175,000 |
| CONSTRUCTIVE DIALOGUE INSTITUTE | $151,610 |
| NEXTBOOK INC - TABLET MAGAZINE | $150,000 |
| COUNCIL OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES | $150,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $855k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +35% for the ones you funded once.
54 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2024, 28 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.6M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GWGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC5× · 2018–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +37%
- TRTHE RITA AND ALEX HILLMAN FOUNDATION4× · 2021–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +68%
- TFTHE FRED ROGERS COMPANY3× · 2021–2024 · $900k · revenue +4%
Funded once
ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAIone grant, 2023 · $600k · revenue +8%- CTCENTER TO ADVANCE PALLIATIVE CAREone grant, 2022 · $500k
- SCSKIDMORE COLLEGEone grant, 2018 · $302k · revenue +18%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…
Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.
Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Center for Family Philanthropy Inc and the most unlike its peers is Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
180 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 180 of the 216 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE RITA AND ALEX HILLMAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE FRED ROGERS COMPANY ↗
- Who funds WGBH Educational Foundation ↗
- Who funds Braver AngelsInc ↗
- Who funds CONSTRUCTIVE DIALOGUE INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
- Who funds SOLUTIONS JOURNALISM NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA ↗
- Who funds AQUIFER INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LEARNED SOCIETIES ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH AMERICA ↗
- Who funds THE KUHN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BETHUNE-COOKMAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds SKIDMORE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Northwestern University ↗
- Who funds RARE ↗
- Who funds The Pew Charitable Trusts ↗
- Who funds WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds STETSON UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds MARINE CONSERVATION BIOLOGY INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds DICKINSON COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Trinity University ↗
- Who funds DENISON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds MUHLENBERG COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds University of Michigan ↗
- Who funds Woodwell Climate Research Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds Cornell University ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arthur V Davis Foundation Pf #3 · The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc · Jacksonville Jaguars Foundation Inc · Pga Tour Inc · Winston Family Foundation · VyStar Credit Union · The Maryellen S Willis Charitable Trust · Mayo Clinic Group Return · United Way of Northeast Florida Inc · The Teagle Foundation · Csx Foundation Inc · Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Arthur Vining Davis Foundation #2 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution — 63% of income from government
- Hebrew Rehabilitation Center — 53% of income from government
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
- Jacksonville Area Legal Aid Inc — 13% of income from government
- Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- Edward Waters University Inc — 11% of income from government
- Woodwell Climate Research Center Inc — 11% of income from government
- Children's Inn at Nih Inc — 10% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Kipp Jacksonville Inc — 7% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Bethune-Cookman University — 6% of income from government
- Jerusalem Peacebuilders Inc — 5% of income from government
- Groundwork Jacksonville Inc — 3% of income from government
- Trustees of Clark University — 2% of income from government
- Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- United Way of Northeast Florida Inc — 2% of income from government
- Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc — 1% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Middlebury College — 1% of income from government
- Wgbh Educational Foundation — 1% of income from government
- Campus Compact — 1% of income from government
- Stetson University Inc — 0% of income from government
- The Center for Effective Philanthropy Inc — 0% of income from government
- Jacksonville Zoological Society Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Arthur Vining Davis Foundation #2?
Find your warmest path to Arthur Vining Davis Foundation #2 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.