How much did ARTHUR AND JOAN WEISBERG FAMILY grant in FY2023?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 63% of ARTHUR AND JOAN WEISBERG FAMILY’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2021

ronald mcdonald

2022

ronald mcdonaldcharleston catholicmarshallway

2023

marshallisrealhopeway

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2023 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

Under $10k14 grants · $81k
$10k–50k31 grants · $581k
$50k–250k2 grants · $101k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$15M

Total assets

Largest grants

THE MARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$51,000
BIRTHRIGHT ISREAL FOUNDATION$50,000
MARSHALL HEALTH$45,000
EVELYN RUBENSTEIN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF HOUSTON$45,000
READ ALOUD WV$40,000
AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION$39,500
FRIENDS OF UNISTREAM$36,000
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES$25,000
CLASSROOMS WITHOUT BORDERS$22,000
FACING HUNGER FOODBANK$21,000
UNITED WAY OF THE RIVER CITIES$20,000
National Alliance for Public Charter Schools$20,000
CLAY CENTER$20,000
CASA$20,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF COLORADO$18,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 11%. 62% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$695k · 32 repeat orgs$517k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +92% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.

32 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$695k

$208k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+92%

+24%

Still filing today

50%

40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $309k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

InternationalHuman ServicesHealthEducationPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

TM
THE MARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
2× · 2022–2023 · $56k · revenue +67%
FH
FACING HUNGER FOODBANK
3× · 2021–2023 · $33k · revenue +227%
NA
National Alliance for Public Charter Schools
2× · 2022–2023 · $25k · revenue +10%

Funded once

AI
American Israel Education Foundation
one grant, 2022 · $56k · revenue -27%
UW
United Way
one grant, 2022 · $26k
American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee
one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +24%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Jews United for Justice Inc

To lead washington and baltimore area jews to act on our shared jewish values by pursuing justice and equity in our local community.

Religion

Jewish Family Service

Inspired by our history and values, Jewish Family Service supports the needs of Jewish individuals and families, refugees and immigrants, and our broader community to achieve well-being, health, and stability

Human Services

United Food Bank

Uniting communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition

Jewish Family Service

Jewish Family Service is a nonprofit social service organization that supports people of all faiths as they navigate through lifes's challenges - illness, aging, financial uncertainty, mental health concerns, family problems, or personal…

—

American University Hillel Inc

To enrich the lives of Jewish students so that they may enrich the Jewish people and the world.

—

Jewish Relief Network Ukraine

During the past year we provided humanitarian aid to more than 50,000 people in communities across Ukraine. We provided food, medicine, medical care, programs for children, lodging, counseling and much more. These efforts were carried out…

International

American Jewish World Service Inc

We work to realize human rights and end poverty in africa, asia, latin america and the caribbean.

International

One for Israel

To unite U.S and international churches, ministries and individuals for the proclamation of the Gospel in Israel, to raise funds for evangelism and Gospel proclamation, to provide tangible relief for Israel's needy through charity, and to…

Religion

Jewish Vegan Life Inc

To bring the Jewish and vegan worlds together

Food & Nutrition

World Hunger Relief Institute

World hunger relief institute equips people to alleviate hunger through education, research, and sustainable agriculture.

International

Charleston Jewish Federation Inc

The mission of the Charleston Jewish Federation is to build, secure and sustain Jewish life in Charleston, Israel, and around the world.

Philanthropy

JewishColumbus

To Enrich Jewish Life & Instill Jewish Pride; Protect Our Community; Connect with Israel & World Jewry; Help Vulnerable Jewish Populations

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family and Children's Service and the most unlike its peers is Jewish National Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/43

the rest of the field

11%

206,164/1,819,522

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

39 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

39/39

Grantees still filing

31/39

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$788,750International$147,250Education$96,000Philanthropy$61,000Human Services$49,500Health$49,000Civil Rights$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Encova Foundation of West VirginiaWV30.9× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Encova Foundation of West Virginia · Pallottine Foundation of Huntington · The Wm M & a Cafaro Family Foundation · Peoples Bank Foundation · Truist West Virginia Foundation Inc · Marshall Health Network Inc · Board of Trustees of Prichard Schoo · The Huntington Foundation Inc · United Way of the River Cities Inc · Highmark Foundation · The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation ARTHUR AND JOAN WEISBERG FAMILY funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

2get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: FRIENDS OF UNISTREAM.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~1 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 208156478 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on FRIENDS OF UNISTREAM, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 1 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 12% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Arthur and Joan Weisberg Family?

Find your warmest path to Arthur and Joan Weisberg Family through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

ARTHUR AND JOAN WEISBERG FAMILY

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

39 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Arthur and Joan Weisberg Family?

More from the funding graph

ARTHUR AND JOAN WEISBERG FAMILY

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

39 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Arthur and Joan Weisberg Family?

More from the funding graph