· Public charity
United Way of the River Cities Inc
Uwrc, inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 25 grants below total $590,081 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $632,396 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $42,315 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $7k
- $10k–50k24 grants · $583k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| C-H COALITION FOR HOMELESS | $46,263 |
| GOODWILL INDUSTRIES | $35,000 |
| FIELD OF HOPE | $35,000 |
| LILY'S PLACE | $35,000 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS | $35,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB | $35,000 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY | $32,106 |
| GOD'S HANDS AT WORK | $31,053 |
| DRESS FOR SUCCESS | $30,000 |
| SOJOURNERS CARE NETWORK | $26,250 |
| RLB MINISTRIES BACKPACK BUDDIES | $24,471 |
| ST PETER EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $24,355 |
| TRI-STATE LITERACY COUNCIL | $23,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES WV | $22,135 |
| HUNTINGTON CITY MISSION | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $450k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
34 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GIGOODWILL INDUSTRIES KYOWVA AREA INC8× · 2017–2025 · $339k · revenue +41%
- BBBig Brothers Big Sisters of the Tri State Inc8× · 2017–2025 · $246k · revenue +53%
- JWJOHN W HEREFORD BOYS AND GIRLS' CLUBS OF HUNTINGTON INC6× · 2017–2025 · $202k · revenue +81%
Funded once
- LCLINCOLN COUNTY SCHOOLSone grant, 2023 · $26k
- EMEBENEZER MEDICAL OUTREACH INCone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +13%
- PPPOSITIVE PEOPLE ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2022 · $24k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv
The organization is operated as a emergency shelter and home for abused, neglected and troubled children of southwest virginia. it provides services for the local departments of social services. it is paid on a fee for service basis by…
To serve as the primary planning and coordinating body to promote
To provide accurate and comprehensive resources to individuals needing social services in the state of west virginia.
Shelter service for abused women and children in mingo and logan counties in west virginia.
Provide free quality health care for the uninsured children of central kentucky.
The mission of the Community Service Center of Wilmore-High Bridge, Inc. is to provide restorative social services in the Christian tradition of mercy and hope. We do this through community-based intervention strategies for persons and…
The southern west virginia fellowship home is here to serve all in need of a better life apart from drugs and alcohol. we have a confident expectation that a whole new life "a better life" exists for all.
It is our mission to provide food, clothing, household cleaning supplies, and personal hygiene products to low income seniors, veterans, homeless, children, and families.
Nurturing the mental health and psychological well being of children, adults and families.
To provide personal care and counseling services for the development of wholesome family life
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Team for West Virginia Children and the most unlike its peers is Tri-State Literacy Council Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 16% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES KYOWVA AREA INC ↗
- Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Tri State Inc ↗
- Who funds JOHN W HEREFORD BOYS AND GIRLS' CLUBS OF HUNTINGTON INC ↗
- Who funds DEVELOPMENTAL THERAPY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds TRI-STATE LITERACY COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds CABELL-HUNTINGTON COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
- Who funds PRESTERA CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds BRANCHES DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds LILY'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds DRESS FOR SUCCESS RIVER CITIES INC ↗
- Who funds FACING HUNGER FOODBANK INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY MISSION OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC ↗
- Who funds MASON COUNTY LIBRARY BOARD ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION (7015) ↗
- Who funds FIELD OF HOPE COMMUNITY CAMPUS INC ↗
- Who funds KIWANIS DAY NURSERY INC ↗
- Who funds R L B Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds SOJOURNERS CARE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds GOD'S HANDS AT WORK ↗
- Who funds THE RECOVERY POINT OF HUNTINGTON INC ↗
- Who funds Lincoln County Family Resource Network ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds EBENEZER MEDICAL OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds GABRIEL PROJECT OF WEST VIRGINIA ↗
- Who funds Bon Secours Kentucky Health System Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds TEAM FOR WEST VIRGINIA CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds COURT STREET MINISTRIES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Pallottine Foundation of Huntington West Virginia · Encova Foundation of West Virginia · American Electric Power Foundation · Stella Fuller Settlement Inc · Board of Trustees of Prichard Schoo · The Huntington Foundation Inc · The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation · Peoples Bank Foundation · Foundation for the Tri-State Community Inc · Bernard McDonough Foundation Inc · Arthur and Joan Weisberg Family Foundation Inc · Huntington Clinical Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Way of the River Cities Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.