How much did BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF PRICHARD SCHOO grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 71% of BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF PRICHARD SCHOO’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

activities recipienteducational activities

2021

activities recipienteducational activities

2022

activities recipieeducational activitiegirlsactivites recipien

2023

activities recipieeducational activity

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k1 grant · $5k
$10k–50k19 grants · $530k
$50k–250k12 grants · $846k

$40,000

Median grant

States reached

$23M

Total assets

Largest grants

BIG BROTHERS - BIG SISTERS OF THE T$100,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$100,000
GREATER HUNTINGTON PARK & RECREATIO$100,000
GOLDEN GIRL INC$85,000
MARSHALL ARTIST SERIES$81,000
HUNTINGTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$75,000
HUNTINGTON MUSEUM OF ART$55,000
DEVELOPMENTAL THERAPY CENTER$50,000
YOUNG LIFE HUNTINGTON$50,000
MARSHALL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$50,000
THE CHILDREN'S PLACE$50,000
CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATES INC FBO CRIDL$50,000
DRESS FOR SUCCESS RIVER CITIES$45,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF HUNTIN$41,000
HOSPICE OF HUNTINGTON$40,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $460k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19% — the area typically sits at 18%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$6.5M · 39 repeat orgs$751k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against -8% for the ones you funded once.

39 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$6.5M

$501k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%

-8%

Still filing today

33%

20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $250k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationHealthEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

HS
HUNTINGTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA
5× · 2020–2024 · $395k · revenue +7% · 36% of their budget
HM
HUNTINGTON MUSEUM OF ART
5× · 2020–2024 · $235k · revenue +12%
DF
DRESS FOR SUCCESS RIVER CITIES
5× · 2020–2024 · $230k · revenue +23% · 41% of their budget

Funded once

BB
BIG BROTHERS - BIG SISTER
one grant, 2022 · $100k
CA
CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATES INC
one grant, 2022 · $60k
BB
BIG BROTHERS - BIG SISTERS OF THE
one grant, 2023 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

West Virginia University Hospitals Inc

WVU Hospitals exists to provide a quality healthcare system, including tertiary services, to the citizens of WV and the surrounding region.

Health

Huntingdon County Child and Adult

Head start programs, subsidized daycare, pa pre-k, and various child and adult programs.

Education

Hardy County Child Care Center Inc

To provide daycare services for children in the hardy county, wv area; to serve infant to school age children and provide developmentally appropriate care.

Human Services

West Virginia University Medical Corporation

To support the West Virginia University School of Medicine in the furtherance of its charitable, scientific, and educational purposes.

Health

West Virginia United Health System Inc

West Virginia United Health System is committed to improving the health of the communities it serves through quality, cost effective health care services support of health professional training and research.

Health

Wayne County Community Services

Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv

Community Improvement

Tri-County Center

Provide services to individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

—

Hunger Mountain Child Center Inc

Child care and preschool provider

Human Services

Huntington University

Huntington university is a christ centered institution that exists to carry out the mission of christ in higher education through a curriculum of academic excellence.

Education

Community Care of West Virginia Inc

To provide high quality, accessible comprehensive and cost-effective healthcare services to our patients while serving as their medical home.

—

Mountainland Head Start

Empowering young children and families along a path to their highest potential.

Education

Huntington County Child Advocacy

Provide a safe and compassionate, child focused center to promptly and thoroughly investigate child abuse.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Facing Hunger Foodbank Inc and the most unlike its peers is Marshall University Foundation Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

18/18

Grantees still filing

16/18

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$5,128,887Arts & Culture$675,000Human Services$460,000Health$405,000Education$335,000Employment$230,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Wm M & a Cafaro Family FoundationOH22.2× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Wm M & a Cafaro Family Foundation · The Huntington Foundation Inc · Pallottine Foundation of Huntington · Encova Foundation of West Virginia · United Way of the River Cities Inc · Arthur and Joan Weisberg Family · Foundation for the Tri-State · Marshall Health Network Inc · St Mary's Medical Center Inc · Claude Worthington Benedum Foundation · Huntington Clinical Foundation Inc · Touma Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF PRICHARD SCHOO funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: DRESS FOR SUCCESS RIVER CITIES.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~0 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 205592955 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on DRESS FOR SUCCESS RIVER CITIES, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 0 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 41% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Board of Trustees of Prichard Schoo?

Find your warmest path to Board of Trustees of Prichard Schoo through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF PRICHARD SCHOO

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Board of Trustees of Prichard Schoo?

More from the funding graph

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF PRICHARD SCHOO

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Board of Trustees of Prichard Schoo?

More from the funding graph