Skip to content

· Private foundation

Art and Eva Camunez Tucker Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$912k
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.4MReligion$1.1MHuman Services$916kArts & Culture$803kHousing & Shelter$669kEducation$510kFood & Nutrition$294kPublic Safety & Disaster$259kOther$0
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k23 grants · $513k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $131k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$24,997
Median grant
1
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Howard College$250,000
Salvation Army$75,000
Whit Program$55,500
Wall Brethren Church$42,845
St Joseph's Catholic Church$35,000
Club Victoria Emergency Shelter$35,000
Angelo Civic Theater$34,120
Operation Finally Home$30,000
Wesley Trinity First United Methodi$30,000
Ballet of San Angelo$28,406
Christ The King Retreat Center$25,624
West Texas Counseling and Guidance$25,000
Concho Valley PAWS$25,000
San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts$25,000
House of Faith$24,997
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $53k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%San Angelo Lions Charities Inc: $15k → 13%San Angelo Lions Charities Inc: $15k → 13%San Angelo Early Childhood Center: $14k → 13%Project Dignidad: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.9M · 59 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +11% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

59 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 35 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

59
32

Total granted

$5.9M
$718k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+10%

Still filing today

34%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $321k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPublic Safety & DisasterHuman ServicesArts & CultureHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    Bishop Street Bootcamp Ranch
    7× · 2018–2025 · $184k · revenue +132%
  • HS
    Humane Society of Tom Green County Concho Valley PAWS
    4× · 2017–2025 · $160k · revenue +71%
  • WV
    Wall Volunteer Fire Department Inc
    2× · 2019–2022 · $110k · revenue +123% · 35% of their budget

Funded once

  • BC
    Ballinger Chamber of Commerce
    one grant, 2023 · $158k
  • WT
    West Texas Rehabilitaion Center
    one grant, 2024 · $100k
  • SC
    Saint Charles Catholic Church
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Antonio Automobile Dealers Association Foundation Inc
—
2
Forest Park Community

To provide safe affordable housing to the elderly and disabled.

—
3
West Texas Christian Ministries

To benefit, perform functions of, and carry out the purposes of johnson street church of christ, san angelo, texas a texas non-profit corporation with a special emphasis of its purposes related to the support of the elderly.

Religion
4
Hospice of San Angelo Inc

Hospice of san angelo, inc. (hospice or organization) provides an expert approach to care for those living with a limiting illness in the comfort of their own home and designated nursing homes throughout the twelve counties in the west…

—
5
South Brazos County Fire Department

Volunteer Fire Department, providing fire, rescue, and medical services to a population of approximately 22,000 residents, 24 hours per day, 365 days per year.

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Healthy Families San Angelo

To enhance the ability of families to protect, nuture, and educate their children in the first five years of life and enable them to enter school ready to learn.

—
7
Concho Valley Regional Food Bank

To serve as a clerainghouse for salvage and surplus food that otherwise might be wasted.

—
8
South Texas Food Bank

To alleviate hunger in the immediate service area through the distribution of food products donated by the usda, feeding america, area grocery stores, etc. which are distributed to the needy by way of area food banks and other qualified…

Community Improvement
9
San Saba Volunteer Fire Department

To protect the lives and property of the citizens of the city and county of San Saba, Texas.

Public Safety & Disaster
10
San Antonio Food Bank

The mission of the san antonio food bank is to fight hunger in southwest texas through food distribution, programs, education and advocacy.

—
11
Salado Volunteer Fire Department

Fire fighting for the community of salado, tx and surrounding area. maintains the fire equipment, provides education for fire firefighters and protect the community and surrounding area.

Public Safety & Disaster
12
Mission Able

Mobilize volunteers or skilled professionals to meet needs that primarily serve the san marcos, texas area.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Concho Valley Home for Girls Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ballinger Cares Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 97 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/36
Grantees still filing
22/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Alcohol and Drug Abuse Council: $626,829 · OtherAlcohol and Drug Abuse CouncilYMCA of San Angelo: $430,000 · OtherYMCA of San AngeloIndividual grant recipient: $273,916 · OtherHoward College: $250,000 · OtherSAN ANGELO SYMPHONY SOCIETY: $206,383 · OtherCatholic Outreach Services: $204,164 · Other+79 more: $4,012,885 · Other+79 moreWEST TEXAS COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE: $105,960 · HealthCONCHO VALLEY BIBLICAL COUNSELING CENTER: $86,000 · HealthCONCHO VALLEY TURNING POINT: $76,388 · HealthWall Volunteer Fire Department Inc: $110,000 · Public Safety & DisasterCHRISTOVAL VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $92,500 · Public Safety & DisasterGRAPE CREEK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT INC: $11,760 · Public Safety & DisasterBishop Street Bootcamp Ranch: $183,500 · ReligionSAN ANGELO AREA FOUNDATION: $158,000 · PhilanthropyBALLINGER CARES INC: $13,968 · PhilanthropyHumane Society of Tom Green County Concho Valley PAWS: $160,000 · AnimalsOPERATION FINALLY HOME: $95,000 · Housing & ShelterRIO CONCHO MANOR INC: $25,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$6,004,177Health$268,348Public Safety & Disaster$214,260Religion$183,500Philanthropy$171,968Animals$160,000Housing & Shelter$120,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAN ANGELO SYMPHONY SOCIETY: $206,383 over 7y, 5.3% of budgetBishop Street Bootcamp Ranch: $183,500 over 7y, 22% of budgetHumane Society of Tom Green County Concho Valley PAWS: $160,000 over 4y, 8.2% of budgetSAN ANGELO AREA FOUNDATION: $158,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of San Angelo Inc: $118,632 over 5y, 12% of budgetWall Volunteer Fire Department Inc: $110,000 over 2y, 35% of budgetWEST TEXAS COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE: $105,960 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetSan Angelo Museum of Fine Arts: $98,500 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES DEPT OF TEXAS: $95,670 over 3y, 18% of budgetOPERATION FINALLY HOME: $95,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCHRISTOVAL VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $92,500 over 5y, 10% of budgetTHE WHIT PROGRAM INC: $90,500 over 2y, 15% of budgetCONCHO VALLEY BIBLICAL COUNSELING CENTER: $86,000 over 5y, 15% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE CONCHO VALLEY: $85,000 over 4y, 5.1% of budgetMEALS FOR THE ELDERLY INC: $83,818 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetCONCHO VALLEY TURNING POINT: $76,388 over 4y, 14% of budgetSONRISAS THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC: $55,000 over 5y, 7.0% of budgetCARNEGIE LIBRARY OF BALLINGER: $40,473 over 2y, 26% of budgetKEEP SAN ANGELO BEAUTIFUL: $35,100 over 4y, 7.5% of budgetCONCHO VALLEY HOME FOR GIRLS INC: $27,330 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetSAN ANGELO CIVIC BALLET: $25,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetWALL EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetSAN ANGELO STOCK SHOW & RODEO ASSOCIATIO: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRIO CONCHO MANOR INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCORNERSTONE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $17,447 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSAN ANGELO PERFORMING ARTS COALITION INC: $16,275 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF SAN ANGELO INC: $15,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetBALLINGER CARES INC: $13,968 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetWEST TEXAS BOYS RANCH: $11,750 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAN ANGELO SYMPHONY SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Bishop Street Bootcamp Ranch ↗
  • Who funds Humane Society of Tom Green County Concho Valley PAWS ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANGELO AREA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Habitat for Humanity of San Angelo Inc ↗
  • Who funds Wall Volunteer Fire Department Inc ↗
  • Who funds WEST TEXAS COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE ↗
  • Who funds San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts ↗
  • Who funds VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OF THE UNITED STATES DEPT OF TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION FINALLY HOME ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTOVAL VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WHIT PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds CONCHO VALLEY BIBLICAL COUNSELING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE CONCHO VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds MEALS FOR THE ELDERLY INC ↗
  • Who funds CONCHO VALLEY TURNING POINT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Angelo Area FoundationTX56.7× affinity25 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Angelo Area Foundation · San Angelo Health Foundation · Mary Ellen Kent Bunyard Family Foundation · Kickapoo Springs Foundation · American Electric Power Foundation · Pak Foundation · James B and Lois R Archer Charitable Foundation · Stribling Funding Corporation · United Way of the Concho Valley Inc · San Antonio Food Bank · F V Hall & Marylou Hall Childrens Crisis Fund · Wynne Family Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Art and Eva Camunez Tucker Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Art and Eva Camunez Tucker Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Art and Eva Camunez Tucker Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Art and Eva Camunez Tucker Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 97 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Art and Eva Camunez Tucker’s filings →

    More from the funding graph