· Private foundation
Wynne Family Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHILDREN INTERNATIONAL | $5,000 |
| HEIFER INTERNATIONAL | $5,000 |
| PANTHERA CORPORATION | $4,000 |
| ZAMBIAN CARNIVORE PROGRAM | $4,000 |
| ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE | $3,000 |
| WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK | $3,000 |
| THE SETTLEMENT CLUB | $2,000 |
| THE MALALA FUND | $2,000 |
| WOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT | $2,000 |
| PAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS | $2,000 |
| CITIZENS FOR ANIMAL PROTECTION | $2,000 |
| WHIT PROGRAM | $2,000 |
| CHILDREN OF THE NATIONS | $2,000 |
| SEMPER FI AMERICA'S FUND | $2,000 |
| WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY (COLORADO) | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 26% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +5% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
37 repeat relationships — 37 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $250 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WCWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC3× · 2023–2025 · $5k · revenue +64%
- COCHILDREN OF THE NATIONS3× · 2023–2025 · $5k · revenue +3%
- ZCZAMBIA CARNIVORE PROGRAMME2× · 2023–2025 · $4k · revenue +13%
Funded once
- BSBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICAone grant, 2024 · $3k
- NANOAH'S ARK ANIMAL SANCTUARYone grant, 2024 · $2k
- MFMATALA FUND THEone grant, 2024 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…
To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.
One tail at a time west texas otat wtx serves the rural communities of west texas by supporting animal shelter operations rescuing and sheltering homeless unwanted companion animals dogs and cats primarily arranging their veterinary care…
To pass animal protection laws, educate the public, and support humane candidates for office.
Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.
Awf's mission is to ensure wildlife and wild lands thrive in modern africa. we work to equip african governments, institutions, business, and communities with the tools, insights, and support they need to define, own, and realize a…
Peace 4 animals animal welfare organization supports the conservation of endangered species worldwide. we work on campaigns to promote advocacy and education on how to protect wildlife in peril, as well as the preservation of their natural…
Dazzle africa's mission is to partner with local organizations to provide programs in conservation, education and community development. the organization aims to ensure that future generations are self-sufficient and iconic african…
HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…
Protection of animal rights
Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Capital Research Center and the most unlike its peers is Executive Construction Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Children International ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN OF THE NATIONS ↗
- Who funds FAITH IN PRACTICE ↗
- Who funds PANTHERA CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ZAMBIA CARNIVORE PROGRAMME ↗
- Who funds Citizens For Animal Protection Inc ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT INC ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WEST TEXAS BOYS RANCH ↗
- Who funds PAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS ↗
- Who funds SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND ↗
- Who funds THE SETTLEMENT CLUB ↗
- Who funds MEALS FOR THE ELDERLY INC ↗
- Who funds THE WHIT PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds THE MALALA FUND ↗
- Who funds Charity Navigator ↗
- Who funds K9 Kitt Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds DIVINE WATER ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE AUSTIN ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC ↗
- Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF AUSTIN & TRAVIS COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds HIGHLAND LAKES SPCA ↗
- Who funds Humane Society of Tom Green County Concho Valley PAWS ↗
- Who funds DAY 1 BAGS ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR PRADER-WILLI RESEARCH INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Art and Eva Camunez Tucker Foundation · San Angelo Health Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Shell USA Company Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · The Pfizer Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Wynne Family Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Coral Restoration Foundation Inc — 16% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.