Skip to content

· Private foundation

Armey-Harvey Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$67k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$52kHealth$34kHuman Services$30kHousing & Shelter$24kYouth Development$16kArts & Culture$7kEducation$4kCivil Rights$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k18 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $22k
$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$127k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$12,000
MONTAGE HEALTH FOUNDATION$10,000
LAKEWOOD CHURCH$7,000
CARMEL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$7,000
YOUTH FOR CHRIST$7,000
FRESNO RESCUE MISSION$7,000
K-LOVE RADIO$2,400
BREAK THE BARRIERS$2,000
JOYCE MEYER MINISTRIES$2,000
RAY OF HOPE$2,000
EVANGEL HOME$1,600
HAGGAI INSTITUTE$1,500
LINK CARE CENTER$1,000
RIGHT TO LIFE CENTRAL CALIFORNIA$1,000
FRESNO PACIFIC UNIVERSITY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%BREAK THE BARRIERS: $2k → 19%BREAK THE BARRIERS: $2k → 19%BREAK THE BARRIERS: $2k → 19%BREAK THE BARRIERS: $2k → 19%EVANGEL HOME: $3k → 19%EVANGEL HOME: $2k → 19%EVANGEL HOME: $2k → 19%EVANGEL HOME: $2k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$210k · 21 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
2

Total granted

$210k
$1k

Still filing today

38%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’23’24
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    MONTAGE HEALTH FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2024 · $30k · revenue +84%
  • BT
    Break the Barriers Inc
    4× · 2020–2024 · $8k · revenue +47%
  • EH
    EVANGEL HOME INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $7k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • C
    CMBC
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • N
    NAMI
    one grant, 2020 · $250
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Valley Health Team Inc

Valley Health Team, Inc. was established in 1973 for the purpose of providing accessible comprehensive, quality primary health care and additional services to the people in the communities we serve in a culturally and linguistically…

Health
2
Central Valley Business Federation

To strengthen the voice of business in Californias Central Valley through information sharing expertise networking connections and research to impact economic policies programs and projects.

Community Improvement
3
Fresno Building Healthy Communities

To foster and encourage thriving communities where all children and families can live healthy, safe, and productive lives

Community Improvement
4
Fresno-Madera Medical Society

To promote the science of medicine.

Health
5
Central Valley Broadcasting Co Inc

To provide Christian Radio Broadcasts.

Religion
6
Valley Children's Healthcare

To support health care activities and programs for the benefit of, and to provide health care services to, children and adults in central california with diseases, disorders and other health problems of pediatric origin, and to enhance the…

Health
7
Fresno City Center Corporation

To be a supporting organization of the fresno rescue mission, inc. acting as a trustee in receiving, investing, managing, administrating, and distributing designated funds for the ministries of the mission. also, to invest and develop…

Housing & Shelter
8
Fresno Chamber of Commerce Greater Fresno Area Chamber of Commerce

Enhancing and supporting private sector business

—
9
Southwest Fresno Development Corporation

To lift up and restore pride in the sw fresno community through providing pathways to entrepreneurship and homeownership, creating safer, cleaner, and vibrant neighborhoods where residents thrive.

—
10
American College of Emergency Physicians State Chapter of California Inc

California ACEP's mission is to support emergency physicians in providing the highest quality of care to all patients and to the community.

—
11
Upvalley Family Centers of Napa County

The mission of the UpValley Family Centers is to provide guidance, support and resources in the community, in the home and for the individual so that everyone can achieve a better life. We serve youth, adults and families in the…

Human Services
12
The Bay Area Video Coalition Incorporated

Bay Area Video Coalition, "BAVC Media", inspires social change by enabling the sharing of diverse stories through art, education and technology.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fresno Rescue Mission Inc; the most unlike its peers is Break the Barriers Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $33,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCARMEL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $26,000 · OtherCARMEL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHLAKEWOOD CHURCH: $12,100 · OtherLAKEWOOD CHURCHRAY OF HOPE: $9,000 · OtherRAY OF HOPEFUND: $6,600 · OtherJOYCE MEYER MINISTRIES INC: $6,200 · OtherHAGGAI INSTITUTE: $5,500 · OtherK-LOVE RADIO: $4,700 · Other+10 more: $23,250 · Other+10 moreMONTAGE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $30,000 · HealthMONTAGE HEALTH F…FRESNO RESCUE MISSION INC: $24,000 · Housing & ShelterFRESNO RESCU…FresnoMadera Youth For Christ Inc: $15,500 · Youth DevelopmentBreak the Barriers Inc: $8,000 · Human ServicesEVANGEL HOME INC: $7,200 · Human ServicesValley Public Television Inc: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$126,350Health$30,000Housing & Shelter$24,000Youth Development$15,500Human Services$15,200Arts & Culture$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMONTAGE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRESNO RESCUE MISSION INC: $24,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFresnoMadera Youth For Christ Inc: $15,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetBreak the Barriers Inc: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetEVANGEL HOME INC: $7,200 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFRESNO PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLA COMIDA GUILD: $4,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetValley Public Television Inc: $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MONTAGE HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRESNO RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds FresnoMadera Youth For Christ Inc ↗
  • Who funds Break the Barriers Inc ↗
  • Who funds EVANGEL HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds FRESNO PACIFIC UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LA COMIDA GUILD ↗
  • Who funds Valley Public Television Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Daniel R Martin Family FoundationCA15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Daniel R Martin Family Foundation · Leon S Peters Foundation · Briscoe Family Foundation · Teichert Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Armey-Harvey Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Armey-Harvey Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Armey-Harvey’s filings →

    More from the funding graph