Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Armey-Harvey Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$67k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Religion$52kHealth$34kHuman Services$30kHousing & Shelter$24kYouth Development$16kArts & Culture$7kEducation$4kCivil Rights$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k18 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $22k
$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$127k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$12,000
MONTAGE HEALTH FOUNDATION$10,000
CARMEL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$7,000
LAKEWOOD CHURCH$7,000
FRESNO RESCUE MISSION$7,000
YOUTH FOR CHRIST$7,000
K-LOVE RADIO$2,400
JOYCE MEYER MINISTRIES$2,000
RAY OF HOPE$2,000
BREAK THE BARRIERS$2,000
EVANGEL HOME$1,600
HAGGAI INSTITUTE$1,500
FRESNO PACIFIC UNIVERSITY$1,000
RIGHT TO LIFE CENTRAL CALIFORNIA$1,000
LINK CARE CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%BREAK THE BARRIERS: $2k → 19%BREAK THE BARRIERS: $2k → 19%BREAK THE BARRIERS: $2k → 19%BREAK THE BARRIERS: $2k → 19%EVANGEL HOME: $3k → 19%EVANGEL HOME: $2k → 19%EVANGEL HOME: $2k → 19%EVANGEL HOME: $2k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$210k · 21 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
2

Total granted

$210k
$1k

Still filing today

38%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’23’24
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    MONTAGE HEALTH FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2024 · $30k · revenue +84%
  • BT
    Break the Barriers Inc
    4× · 2020–2024 · $8k · revenue +47%
  • EH
    EVANGEL HOME INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $7k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • C
    CMBC
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • N
    NAMI
    one grant, 2020 · $250

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Valley Health Team Inc

Valley Health Team, Inc. was established in 1973 for the purpose of providing accessible comprehensive, quality primary health care and additional services to the people in the communities we serve in a culturally and linguistically…

Health
2
Central Valley Business Federation

To strengthen the voice of business in Californias Central Valley through information sharing expertise networking connections and research to impact economic policies programs and projects.

Community Improvement
3
Fresno Building Healthy Communities

To foster and encourage thriving communities where all children and families can live healthy, safe, and productive lives

Community Improvement
4
Fresno-Madera Medical Society

To promote the science of medicine.

Health
5
Central Valley Broadcasting Co Inc

To provide Christian Radio Broadcasts.

Religion
6
Valley Children's Healthcare

To support health care activities and programs for the benefit of, and to provide health care services to, children and adults in central california with diseases, disorders and other health problems of pediatric origin, and to enhance the…

Health
7
Fresno City Center Corporation

To be a supporting organization of the fresno rescue mission, inc. acting as a trustee in receiving, investing, managing, administrating, and distributing designated funds for the ministries of the mission. also, to invest and develop…

Housing & Shelter
8
Fresno Chamber of Commerce Greater Fresno Area Chamber of Commerce

Enhancing and supporting private sector business

9
Southwest Fresno Development Corporation

To lift up and restore pride in the sw fresno community through providing pathways to entrepreneurship and homeownership, creating safer, cleaner, and vibrant neighborhoods where residents thrive.

10
American College of Emergency Physicians State Chapter of California Inc

California ACEP's mission is to support emergency physicians in providing the highest quality of care to all patients and to the community.

11
Upvalley Family Centers of Napa County

The mission of the UpValley Family Centers is to provide guidance, support and resources in the community, in the home and for the individual so that everyone can achieve a better life. We serve youth, adults and families in the…

Human Services
12
The Bay Area Video Coalition Incorporated

Bay Area Video Coalition, "BAVC Media", inspires social change by enabling the sharing of diverse stories through art, education and technology.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fresno Rescue Mission Inc and the most unlike its peers is Break the Barriers Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $33,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCARMEL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $26,000 · OtherCARMEL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHLAKEWOOD CHURCH — $12,100 · OtherLAKEWOOD CHURCHRAY OF HOPE — $9,000 · OtherRAY OF HOPEFUND — $6,600 · OtherJOYCE MEYER MINISTRIES INC — $6,200 · OtherHAGGAI INSTITUTE — $5,500 · OtherK-LOVE RADIO — $4,700 · Other+10 more — $23,250 · Other+10 moreMONTAGE HEALTH FOUNDATION — $30,000 · HealthMONTAGE HEALTH F…FRESNO RESCUE MISSION INC — $24,000 · Housing & ShelterFRESNO RESCU…FresnoMadera Youth For Christ Inc — $15,500 · Youth DevelopmentBreak the Barriers Inc — $8,000 · Human ServicesEVANGEL HOME INC — $7,200 · Human ServicesValley Public Television Inc — $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$126,350Health$30,000Housing & Shelter$24,000Youth Development$15,500Human Services$15,200Arts & Culture$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMONTAGE HEALTH FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRESNO RESCUE MISSION INC — $24,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFresnoMadera Youth For Christ Inc — $15,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetBreak the Barriers Inc — $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetEVANGEL HOME INC — $7,200 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFRESNO PACIFIC UNIVERSITY — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLA COMIDA GUILD — $4,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetValley Public Television Inc — $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MONTAGE HEALTH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FRESNO RESCUE MISSION INC
  • Who funds FresnoMadera Youth For Christ Inc
  • Who funds Break the Barriers Inc
  • Who funds EVANGEL HOME INC
  • Who funds FRESNO PACIFIC UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds LA COMIDA GUILD
  • Who funds Valley Public Television Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Daniel R Martin Family FoundationCA15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Daniel R Martin Family Foundation · Leon S Peters Foundation · Briscoe Family Foundation · Teichert Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Armey-Harvey Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph