Skip to content
Arlene F Page and J David Page Charitable Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Arlene F Page and J David Page Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$337k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

International$210kHealth$171kAnimals$62kPhilanthropy$40kHuman Services$33kYouth Development$33kFood & Nutrition$30kRecreation & Sports$11kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $177k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $140k
$10,290
Median grant
9
States reached
$6.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF THAI DAUGHTERS$90,000
DANA FARBER CANCER FUND$50,000
FEEDING THE HUNGRY$30,443
ADAMS CO PET RESCUE SHELTER$25,000
BUONICONTI FUND$25,000
PARTNERING FOR PROGRESS$25,000
Individual grant recipient$21,000
HOPE FOR A CURE$10,290
HARVARD COLLEGE$10,000
OLD DOG HAVEN$10,000
BIG DOG RANCH$10,000
PLAY FOR PINK$10,000
CHEERS FOR CHARITY$7,500
CAF AMERICA$5,000
PHILLIP BROOKS HOUSE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $218k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NW FURNITURE BANK: $5k → 9%CHEERS FOR CHARITY: $20k → 16%FRIENDS OF THAI DAUGHTERS: $90k → 9%CHEERS FOR CHARITY: $8k → 16%FRIENDS OF THAI DAUGHTERS: $90k → 9%CARIDAD CENTER: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
WA
NY
MA
IA
NJ
CT
KY
VA
MD
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$425k · 10 repeat orgs$226k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
10

Total granted

$425k
$99k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+24%

Still filing today

70%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $126k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthAnimalsYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    MS HOPE FOR A CURE INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +5%
  • OD
    OLD DOG HAVEN
    3× · 2022–2024 · $18k · revenue +34%
  • BD
    BIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $11k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • CH
    CAMP HARBOR VIEW FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +101%
  • PF
    Polo For Life Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +1%
  • VR
    Vinceremos Riding Center Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +18%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope Reins

Hope reins' vision is to inspire true hope and real healing for every child. at our ranch, we pair children and teens experiencing trauma with a rescued horse and mentor to find hope and healing. the free-of-charge individual and group…

Health
2
Horses Without Humans Rescue Organization

We are a 501c3 organization that takes in horses that have no humans no voice of their own and no other options. we provide the compassion and time it takes to rehabilitate them as well as professional assessment medical care and…

Animals
3
Carolina Therapeutic Riding Inc

Connecting humans with horses to transform lives and bring hope.

Animals
4
Heavens Gait Ranch Inc

Equine Activities under PATH International Building a compassionate community to challenge adversity to grow.

Recreation & Sports
5
Bright Pink Nfp

Bright pink's mission is to accelerate, deepen, and expand the impact of life-saving breast and ovarian health interventions.

—
6
Permanently Disabled Jockeys Fund Inc

Provide financial assistance to permanently disabled jockeys.

Philanthropy
7
American Horse Council Foundation Inc

Perform charitable, scientific, and educational activities associated with the Horse Industry

Health
8
Partnership for Cures

Cures Within Reach leverages the speed, safety and cost-effectiveness of testing approved therapies for new indications/diseases without effective treatment driving more treatments quicker to more patients.

Health
9
Passion for Paws Inc

To provide a sanctuary for senior pets (dogs, cats, farm animals) and to provide access to vet care for indigent people

Animals
10
Buckn-R-Ranch Animal Rescue Inc

BRRARI was created to engage and help in the plight of homeless domestic animals in need and provide education for the surrounding communities of Parker, Franktown and Castle Rock, Colorado. BRRARI closed it's facilities on December 31,…

—
11
Veterinarians International Inc

Providing veterinary aid and education to improve the health and well-being of animals and their communities worldwide.

Health
12
Southern California Equine Foundation Inc

Providing equine veterinary hospital facilities and support services in the care of injured or sick race horses

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc; the most unlike its peers is Partnering for Progress. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DANA FARBER CANCER FUND: $100,000 · OtherDANA FARBER CANCER FUNDBUONICONTI FUND: $40,000 · OtherBUONICONTI FUNDFEEDING THE HUNGRY: $30,443 · OtherFEEDING THE HUNGRYADAMS CO PET RESCUE SHELTER: $25,000 · OtherADAMS CO PET RESCUE SHELTERIndividual grant recipient: $21,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $11,000 · OtherHARVARD COLLEGE: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherUSET FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Other+4 more: $18,250 · Other+4 moreFRIENDS OF THAI DAUGHTERS INC: $180,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THAI DAUGHTERS INCCheers to Charity: $27,500 · Human ServicesCheers to Charity+2 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesPolo For Life Inc: $25,000 · HealthPolo For …MS HOPE FOR A CURE INC: $20,290 · HealthMS HOPE F…Vinceremos Riding Center Inc: $10,000 · HealthVinceremo…+1 more: $1,000 · HealthOLD DOG HAVEN: $18,000 · AnimalsBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC: $11,000 · AnimalsBROOKE USA INC: $7,500 · AnimalsCAMP HARBOR VIEW FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentDRESSAGE 4 KIDS INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentPARTNERING FOR PROGRESS: $25,000 · InternationalPLAY FOR PINK INC: $10,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$275,693Human Services$217,500Health$56,290Animals$36,500Youth Development$35,000International$25,000Crime & Legal$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF THAI DAUGHTERS INC: $180,000 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetCheers to Charity: $27,500 over 2y, 22% of budgetCAMP HARBOR VIEW FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARTNERING FOR PROGRESS: $25,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetPolo For Life Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetMS HOPE FOR A CURE INC: $20,290 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetOLD DOG HAVEN: $18,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC: $11,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVinceremos Riding Center Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetDRESSAGE 4 KIDS INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBROOKE USA INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCaridad Center Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNW FURNITURE BANK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEquestrian Aid Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN HORSE TRIALS FOUNDATION INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Network for GoodNational Philanthropi…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …American Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY9.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Arlene F Page and J David Page Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Arlene F Page and J David Page Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Camp Harbor View Foundation Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Caridad Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Arlene F Page and J David Page Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Arlene F Page and J David Page Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Arlene F Page and J David Page’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home