· Private foundation
Arlene F Page and J David Page Charitable Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 41% of ARLENE F PAGE AND J DAVID PAGE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $20k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $177k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $140k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FRIENDS OF THAI DAUGHTERS | $90,000 |
| DANA FARBER CANCER FUND | $50,000 |
| FEEDING THE HUNGRY | $30,443 |
| PARTNERING FOR PROGRESS | $25,000 |
| ADAMS CO PET RESCUE SHELTER | $25,000 |
| BUONICONTI FUND | $25,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $21,000 |
| HOPE FOR A CURE | $10,290 |
| OLD DOG HAVEN | $10,000 |
| BIG DOG RANCH | $10,000 |
| HARVARD COLLEGE | $10,000 |
| PLAY FOR PINK | $10,000 |
| CHEERS FOR CHARITY | $7,500 |
| PHILLIP BROOKS HOUSE | $5,000 |
| CAF AMERICA | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $218k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $126k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MHMS HOPE FOR A CURE INC2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +5%
- ODOLD DOG HAVEN3× · 2022–2024 · $18k · revenue +34%
- BDBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC2× · 2022–2024 · $11k · revenue +37%
Funded once
- PFPolo For Life Incone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +1%
- CHCAMP HARBOR VIEW FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +101%
- VRVinceremos Riding Center Incone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +18%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Hope reins' vision is to inspire true hope and real healing for every child. at our ranch, we pair children and teens experiencing trauma with a rescued horse and mentor to find hope and healing. the free-of-charge individual and group…
We are a 501c3 organization that takes in horses that have no humans no voice of their own and no other options. we provide the compassion and time it takes to rehabilitate them as well as professional assessment medical care and…
Connecting humans with horses to transform lives and bring hope.
Equine Activities under PATH International Building a compassionate community to challenge adversity to grow.
Bright pink's mission is to accelerate, deepen, and expand the impact of life-saving breast and ovarian health interventions.
Provide financial assistance to permanently disabled jockeys.
Perform charitable, scientific, and educational activities associated with the Horse Industry
Cures Within Reach leverages the speed, safety and cost-effectiveness of testing approved therapies for new indications/diseases without effective treatment driving more treatments quicker to more patients.
To provide a sanctuary for senior pets (dogs, cats, farm animals) and to provide access to vet care for indigent people
BRRARI was created to engage and help in the plight of homeless domestic animals in need and provide education for the surrounding communities of Parker, Franktown and Castle Rock, Colorado. BRRARI closed it's facilities on December 31,…
Providing veterinary aid and education to improve the health and well-being of animals and their communities worldwide.
Providing equine veterinary hospital facilities and support services in the care of injured or sick race horses
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc and the most unlike its peers is Partnering for Progress. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THAI DAUGHTERS INC ↗
- Who funds Cheers to Charity ↗
- Who funds Polo For Life Inc ↗
- Who funds PARTNERING FOR PROGRESS ↗
- Who funds CAMP HARBOR VIEW FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MS HOPE FOR A CURE INC ↗
- Who funds OLD DOG HAVEN ↗
- Who funds BIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds PLAY FOR PINK INC ↗
- Who funds Vinceremos Riding Center Inc ↗
- Who funds DRESSAGE 4 KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds BROOKE USA INC ↗
- Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA ↗
- Who funds Caridad Center Inc ↗
- Who funds NW FURNITURE BANK ↗
- Who funds Equestrian Aid Foundation ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN HORSE TRIALS FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Arlene F Page and J David Page Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Camp Harbor View Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
- Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc — 0% of income from government
- Caridad Center Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Arlene F Page and J David Page Charitable Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Arlene F Page and J David Page Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.