Skip to content

· Private foundation

Arkes Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
118
Grants FY2024still arriving
15
States reached
$851k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Employment$4.9MEducation$492kPhilanthropy$265kCivil Rights$261kHealth$194kReligion$132kYouth Development$110kHuman Services$108kOther$0
02FY2024 · 118 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k108 grants · $140k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $166k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $76k
  • $250k+1 grant · $851k
$1,000
Median grant
15
States reached
$7.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HHPLIFT$850,600
JUF$75,900
ANTI DEFAMATION LEAGUE$46,200
Individual grant recipient$30,000
TEACH FOR AMERICA$20,000
ANSHE EMET SYNAGOGUE$19,451
ENCHANTED BACKPACK$15,000
JCUA$15,000
A BETTER CHICAGO$10,000
RESPOND NOW INC$10,000
AMY KROUSE ROSENTHAL FOUNDATION$7,500
DIGESTIVE HEALTH$6,000
THE ARK$5,400
NOURISHING HOPE$5,000
JCFS CHICAGO$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $181k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 14%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 14%A BETTER CHICAGO: $10k → 14%A BETTER CHICAGO: $10k → 14%A BETTER CHICAGO: $10k → 14%A BETTER CHICAGO: $10k → 14%A BETTER CHICAGO: $10k → 14%A BETTER CHICAGO: $10k → 14%A BETTER CHICAGO: $5k → 14%AUNT MARTHAS: $6k → 14%AUNT MARTHAS HEALTH AND WELLNESS INC: $5k → 14%AUNT MARTHAS: $3k → 14%AUNT MARTHAS HEALTH AND WELLNESS INC: $3k → 14%AUNT MARTHAS HEALTH AND WELLNESS INC: $3k → 14%AUNT MARTHAS HEALTH AND WELLNESS INC: $3k → 14%AUNT MARTHAS HEALTH AND WELLNESS INC: $3k → 14%AUNT MARTHAS HEALTH AND WELLNESS INC: $3k → 14%NIGHT MINISTRY: $4k → 14%NIGHT MINISTRY: $3k → 14%NIGHT MINISTRY: $3k → 14%NIGHT MINISTRY: $3k → 14%NIGHT MINISTRY: $3k → 14%NIGHT MINISTRY: $2k → 14%NIGHT MINISTRY: $2k → 14%INSPIRATION CORPORATION: $2k → 14%NIGHT MINISTRY: $2k → 14%INSPIRATION CORPORATION: $1k → 14%INSPIRATION CORPORATION: $1k → 14%INSPIRATION CORPORATION: $1k → 14%INSPIRATION CORPORATION: $1k → 14%CHRISTOPHER HOUSE: $1k → 14%CHRISTOPHER HOUSE: $1k → 14%CHRISTOPHER HOUSE: $1k → 14%IGNITE: $3k → 14%IGNITE: $1k → 14%COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $5k → 14%SHALVA INC: $5k → 14%COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $5k → 14%SHALVA: $5k → 14%COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $4k → 14%SHALVA INC: $3k → 14%COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $3k → 14%SHALVA: $3k → 14%COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $3k → 14%SHALVA INC: $3k → 14%COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $1k → 14%SHALVA INC: $3k → 14%SHALVA INC: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IA
IN
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
AR
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.9M · 176 repeat orgs$127k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

176 repeat relationships: 101 still active in FY2024, 75 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

176
74

Total granted

$6.9M
$87k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+27%

Still filing today

69%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesInternationalArts & CultureHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • H
    HHPLIFT
    8× · 2017–2024 · $4.8M · revenue +12% · 72% of their budget
  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    5× · 2017–2024 · $239k · revenue +78%
  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    5× · 2017–2021 · $197k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • FW
    Francis W Parker Schoolgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +31%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $13k · revenue -31%
  • B
    BZAEDS
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
2
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
3
Junior Achievement of Chicago

To inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy

International
4
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
5
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
6
Loyola University of Chicago

We are chicago's jesuit, catholic university - a diverse community seeking god in all things and working to expand knowledge in the service of humanity through learning, justice, and faith.

Education
7
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
8
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
9
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
10
Chapin Hall Center for Children

Chapin hall's mission is to improve the well-being of children and youth, families, and their communities through broad-perspective policy research.

Human Services
11
The Chicago School of Professional Psychology

The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.

Education
12
Kipp Chicago Schools

The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Illinois Inc; the most unlike its peers is Enchanted Backpack. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

175 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 175 of the 268 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
36
Early backer (in before they grew)
172/175
Grantees still filing
133/175
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HHPLIFT: $4,818,271 · EmploymentHHPLIFT+5 more: $49,910 · EmploymentJUF: $150,900 · OtherJUFANSHE EMET SYNAGOGUE: $111,935 · OtherANSHE EMET SYNA…Lawrence Hall: $51,500 · OtherLawrence HallTHE ARK: $36,800 · OtherHIGHSIGHT: $45,000 · Other+140 more: $539,377 · Other+140 moreBELOIT COLLEGE: $142,287 · EducationTeach for America Inc: $125,000 · EducationBERNARD ZELL ANSHE EMET DAY SCHOOL: $40,500 · EducationFrancis W Parker School: $20,000 · EducationHIGH JUMP: $17,000 · Education+15 more: $35,415 · EducationJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $196,893 · PhilanthropyENCHANTED BACKPACK: $40,000 · PhilanthropyAMY KROUSE ROSENTHAL FOUNDATION: $30,098 · Philanthropy+4 more: $11,200 · PhilanthropyANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $238,950 · Civil Rights+2 more: $9,000 · Civil RightsA Better Chicago: $65,200 · Human ServicesRESPOND NOW: $30,500 · Human ServicesAUNT MARTHA'S HEALTH AND WELLNESS INC: $27,930 · Human ServicesSHALVA INC: $23,645 · Human ServicesCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $21,000 · Human ServicesTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $19,930 · Human ServicesInspiration Corporation: $7,500 · Human Services+7 more: $14,800 · Human ServicesVocel Viewing our Children as Emerging Leaders: $51,000 · Youth DevelopmentB'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB FOUNDATION: $12,500 · Youth Development+2 more: $1,000 · Youth Development
Employment$4,868,181Other$935,512Education$380,202Philanthropy$278,191Civil Rights$247,950Human Services$210,505Youth Development$79,500

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHHPLIFT: $4,818,271 over 8y, 72% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $238,950 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $196,893 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBELOIT COLLEGE: $142,287 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $125,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetA Better Chicago: $65,200 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetLawrence Hall: $51,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetVocel Viewing our Children as Emerging Leaders: $51,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetHIGHSIGHT: $45,000 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetBERNARD ZELL ANSHE EMET DAY SCHOOL: $40,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetENCHANTED BACKPACK: $40,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetRESPOND NOW: $30,500 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetAMY KROUSE ROSENTHAL FOUNDATION: $30,098 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetAUNT MARTHA'S HEALTH AND WELLNESS INC: $27,930 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNOURISHING HOPE: $27,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetThe Cara Program: $25,810 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetJewish Council on Urban Affairs: $24,400 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetSHALVA INC: $23,645 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $21,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDIGESTIVE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $20,800 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetFrancis W Parker School: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $19,930 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGROWING HOME INC: $19,100 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPlanned Parenthood of Illinois: $17,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHIGH JUMP: $17,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetB'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $15,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $13,310 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB FOUNDATION: $12,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND: $12,400 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMERCADO GLOBAL INC: $11,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION: $11,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $11,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE TO END HOMELESSNESS IN SUBURBAN COOK COUNTY: $10,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMAOT CHITIM OF GREATER CHICAGO INC: $9,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetLatinos Progresando: $8,700 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetEPIC Academy: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetInspiration Corporation: $7,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $7,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $7,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM AMERICA ACTION FUND INC: $6,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetWOLCOTT SCHOOL: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetIMPACT 100 CHICAGO NFP: $5,500 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetCHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS: $5,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH LEADERSHIP INITIATIVE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HADASSAH FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetANEW BUILDING BEYOND VIOLENCE AND ABUSE: $5,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $4,850 over 5y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HHPLIFT ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds BELOIT COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
  • Who funds A Better Chicago ↗
  • Who funds Lawrence Hall ↗
  • Who funds Vocel Viewing our Children as Emerging Leaders ↗
  • Who funds HIGHSIGHT ↗
  • Who funds BERNARD ZELL ANSHE EMET DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ENCHANTED BACKPACK ↗
  • Who funds RESPOND NOW ↗
  • Who funds AMY KROUSE ROSENTHAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AUNT MARTHA'S HEALTH AND WELLNESS INC ↗
  • Who funds NOURISHING HOPE ↗
  • Who funds The Cara Program ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Council on Urban Affairs ↗
  • Who funds SHALVA INC ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY ↗
  • Who funds DIGESTIVE HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Francis W Parker School ↗
  • Who funds THE NIGHT MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds GROWING HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds Planned Parenthood of Illinois ↗
  • Who funds HIGH JUMP ↗
  • Who funds B'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
  • Who funds MERCADO GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE TO END HOMELESSNESS IN SUBURBAN COOK COUNTY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of Metropolitan ChicagoIL55.5× affinity30 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · The Chicago Community Trust · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · Circle of Service Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Robert R McCormick Foundation · Fifth Third Chicagoland Foundation · Kovler Family Foundation · Dr Scholl Foundation · AbbVie Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Arkes Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Arkes Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
40report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Arkes Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Arkes Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 268 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Arkes Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph