· Public charity
Arizona Humanities Council Inc
Our mission is to build a just and civil society by creating opportunities for the public to explore our shared human experiences through discussion, learning and reflection.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 16 grants below total $150,573 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $226,490 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $75,917 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $41k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $110k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FLAGSTAFF ARTS COUNCIL | $10,000 |
| MONSOON YOUTH EDUCATION PROJECT - S | $10,000 |
| FLAGSTAFF ARTS COUNCIL | $10,000 |
| CHILDREN'S MUSEUM TUCSON | $10,000 |
| NACO HERITAGE ALLIANCE | $10,000 |
| MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART | $10,000 |
| NORTHERN ARIZONA BOOK FESTIVAL | $10,000 |
| LATINX KIDLIT BOOK FESTIVAL | $10,000 |
| THE HOPI FOUNDATION - HOPI LEADERSH | $10,000 |
| NATURAL HISTORY INSTITUTE | $10,000 |
| VETERANS HERITAGE PROJECT | $10,000 |
| PUEBLO GRANDE MUSEUM AUXILIARY | $9,662 |
| CULTURAL COALITION INC | $9,000 |
| THE BLACK THEATRE TROUPE INC | $7,500 |
| SHARLOT HALL MUSEUM | $7,211 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
46 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 34 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IOIMPRINTS OF HONOR6× · 2017–2024 · $70k · revenue +114%
- SVSEDAV VAAKI MUSEUM FOUNDATION4× · 2018–2024 · $53k · revenue +7% · 56% of their budget
- FAFLAGSTAFF ARTS COUNCIL INC4× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue +64%
Funded once
- ALAmerican Literary Translators Associationgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $23k · revenue +71%
- TFTigerMountain Foundation Incone grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -28%
- RGREVEILLE GAY MENS CHORUSone grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -12%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Mesa historical society is a public museum dedicated to preserving mesas rich culture and history through collections and exhibits
Acquisition preservation and Restoration of Railroad Artifacts Showing the History of Arizona
Our focus is to work with groups and individuals who are in the arts, humanities, education and historic preservation with goals designed to enhance Bisbees unique place in the history of the Southwest, the contribution made to Bisbees…
preserve and celebrate tucson culture
The objectives of the Arizona Archaeological and Historical Society (AAHS) are: to encourage scholarly pursuits into the history and anthropology of the southwest United States and northwest Mexico; (see Schedule O for full mission…
The Arts Foundation mission is to advance artistic expression, civic participation, and equitable economic growth of our diverse community by supporting, promoting, and advocating for arts and culture in our region.
The mohave county historical society maintains a museum in kingman, arizona to collect and display historical objects and to increase and distribute knowledge and appreciation of the history of the area.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arizona Museum of Natural History Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Pinal County Historical Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
94 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 94 of the 108 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds IMPRINTS OF HONOR ↗
- Who funds Museum of Northern Arizona Inc ↗
- Who funds RISING YOUTH THEATRE ↗
- Who funds SEDAV VAAKI MUSEUM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FLAGSTAFF ARTS COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds BORDERLANDS THEATER TEATRO FRONTERIZO INC ↗
- Who funds BLACK THEATRE TROUPE INC ↗
- Who funds Phonetic Spit ↗
- Who funds TUCSON CHINESE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds BORDER YOUTH TENNIS EXCHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN ARIZONA BOOKFESTIVAL INC ↗
- Who funds Vail Preservation Society ↗
- Who funds GEORGE WASHINGTON CARVER MUSEUM AND CULTURAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE HOPI FOUNDATION LOMASUMI'NANGWTUKWSIWMANI ↗
- Who funds EMERSON THEATER COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds BALLET FOLKLORICO QUETZALLI-AZ ↗
- Who funds AGUILA YOUTH LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds Heritage Square Foundation ↗
- Who funds Xico Inc ↗
- Who funds NACO HERITAGE ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds THE LANGUAGE CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds Fountain Hills & Lower Verde River Valley Museum & Historical Society ↗
- Who funds TUCSON HISTORIC PRESERVATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Amerind Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Kore Press Inc ↗
- Who funds PINAL COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds CULTURAL COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds Willcox Theater and Arts Inc ↗
- Who funds American Literary Translators Association ↗
- Who funds SHARLOT HALL HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF AZ ↗
- Who funds WEST VALLEY ARTS COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds GILBERT HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds SEDONA ARTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds LAKE HAVASU CITY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · Southwest Foundation for Education & Historical Preservation · Arts Foundation for Tucson and Southern Arizona · Burton Family Foundation · Thunderbirds Charities · The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement · Western States Arts Federation · Ellis Center for Educational Excellence · Helios Education Foundation · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Arizona Humanities Council Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.