Skip to content

Arizona · Nonprofit

GLEN CANYON CONSERVANCY

GLEN CANYON CONSERVANCY (Arizona) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $742,601 to it, the largest being NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ($704,735). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$974k
Funders on record
5
Grants received
$743k
Net assets
$462k
4/5 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 10%
01What it does

What Glen Canyon Conservancy does

Mission

As the official nonprofit partner of glen canyon national recreation area and rainbow bridge national monument and a partner of bureau of land management in southern utah and southwestern colorado, Glen Canyon Conservancy is dedicated to enriching connections between visitors and area residents to this unique landscape. Through the promotion of interpretive sales, diverse recreational opportunities and educational initiatives, we foster stewardship of the history, culture and natural beauty of glen canyon for current and future generations. Gccs retail outlets are located at carl hayden visitor center in page, navajo bridge interpretive center in marble canyon and at our headquarters in page. Gcc also operates the powell museum & archives. In addition, gcc operated retail outlets at escalante interagency visitor center, kanab visitor center, cannonville visitor center and paria contact station in utah until september 30, 2024. Gcc also operated a retail outlet at canyons of the ancient

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Program

  1. Gcc raises funds through sales of interpretive materials through its physical and digital store presence as well as grant awards and donations to support the educational mission of its government partners.

    $1,303,736 spentof which $118,684 as grants
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2022 Form 990. Program spending in total: $1,303,736.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.3M) Expenses 100 ($1.2M) Net assets 100 ($1.2M)2019 Revenue 170 ($2.2M) Expenses 168 ($2.0M) Net assets 151 ($1.8M)2020 Revenue 76 ($970k) Expenses 99 ($1.2M) Net assets 133 ($1.6M)2021 Revenue 121 ($1.5M) Expenses 101 ($1.2M) Net assets 187 ($2.2M)2022 Revenue 124 ($1.6M) Expenses 141 ($1.7M) Net assets 147 ($1.8M)2023 Revenue 119 ($1.5M) Expenses 185 ($2.2M) Net assets 89 ($1.1M)2024 Revenue 76 ($974k) Expenses 132 ($1.6M) Net assets 39 ($462k)
2017201920202021202220232024
Revenue (76)Expenses (132)Net assets (39)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $2.2M to $3.5M (+56%).

$1.2M
$2.3M
$2.2M
$3.5M
$4.5M
$3.6M
$2.8M
2017201920202021202220232024
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 30% · 2019 24% · 2020 43% · 2021 74% · 2022 52% · 2023 26% · 2024 16%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.

$84k
’17
$161k
’19
−$218k
’20
$333k
’21
−$102k
’22
−$695k
’23
−$604k
’24
4.3
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

2017201920202021202220232024
Listed9101314999
Joined··+3+1+2+6+2
No longer listed··00762
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 3 funders, grant income fell $68k → $63k.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
'25*
total
$705k
River Networkunclassified
$7k
funders
2
2
2
5
4
3
3
2
1

1 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 0% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of GLEN CANYON CONSERVANCY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

GLEN CANYON CONSERVANCY leans on a few funders — its largest provides 95% of grant income and the top three 99%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

99% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund GLEN CANYON CONSERVANCY.

95%
largest funder
99%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 99% · 2018 98% · 2019 97% · 2020 81% · 2021 80% · 2022 98% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

GLEN CANYON CONSERVANCY draws 96% of its grant income from funders outside Arizona, across 3 states in all.

CO
AZ
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Arizona out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $346 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Government funding GLEN CANYON CONSERVANCY receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $2.9M on record.

Federal$2.9M
grants $1.8Mcontracts $1.1M
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Top agencies
  • Department of the Interior$2.9M
  • Department of Agriculture$15k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like GLEN CANYON CONSERVANCY

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Arizona

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

69% of spending goes to programs.

Program 69%Management 31%Fundraising 0%

Governance

8
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

99%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for GLEN CANYON CONSERVANCY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds GLEN CANYON CONSERVANCY?
GLEN CANYON CONSERVANCY (Arizona) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $742,601 to it, the largest being NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ($704,735). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does GLEN CANYON CONSERVANCY have?
IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $742,601 in grants to GLEN CANYON CONSERVANCY, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of GLEN CANYON CONSERVANCY?
NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $704,735 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like GLEN CANYON CONSERVANCY find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Arizona. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 5 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing