Skip to content

· Private foundation

Arent Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$109k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$200kHealth$98kEducation$96kReligion$20kCivil Rights$16kInternational$15kPhilanthropy$10kCommunity Improvement$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $86k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARTS ARENA OF THE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF PARIS$25,000
NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH$11,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
MC CALLUM THEATER$10,000
UC BERKELY FOUNDATION$10,000
AMERICAN HOSPITAL OF PARIS$10,000
UNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM- RELIGIOUS ACTION CENTER OF REFORM JUDAISM$10,000
WORLD MONUMENTS FUND$5,000
EISENHOWER MEDICAL CENTER$5,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$4,000
OCCIDENTIAL COLLEGE$2,500
COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONRLQCC$2,000
SAMBHALI US$1,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LES ARTS FLORRISANTS$1,000
VAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 67% of grant dollars ($311k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 33% that went abroad ($150k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SHANNON FDN: $200 → 12%SHANNON FDN: $200 → 12%SHANNON FDN: $200 → 12%SHANNON FDN: $200 → 12%SHANNON FDN: $200 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 33% of all-years giving ($150k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
France$150k · 7 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$439k · 22 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
7

Total granted

$439k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+29%

Still filing today

50%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CultureInternationalHuman ServicesCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EM
    Eisenhower Medical Center
    5× · 2021–2025 · $25k · revenue +48%
  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $16k · revenue +28%
  • OC
    OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $13k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • AU
    ALIMA USA
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • BA
    BRIDGES ACADEMY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $500 · revenue 0%
  • VB
    VALLEY BETH SHALOM
    one grant, 2022 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
4
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
5
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
6
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
7
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
8
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
9
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
10
Observer Research Foundation America

Organization mission the observer research foundation america orf america is an independent, non-partisan, and nonprofit organization in washington dc dedicated to addressing policy challenges facing the united states, india, and their…

International
11
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
12
Armand Hammer Museum of Art and Cultural Center Inc

The hammer museum at ucla believes in the promise of art and ideas to illuminate our lives and build a more just world.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is De Toledo High School; the most unlike its peers is The Shannon Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ARTS ARENA OF THE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF PARIS: $130,000 · OtherARTS ARENA OF THE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF PARISMC CALLUM THEATER: $50,000 · OtherMC CALLUM THEATERBERKELEY LAW SCHOOL: $30,000 · OtherBERKELEY LAW SCHOOLUC BERKELY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherUC BERKELY FOUNDATIONAMERICAN HOSPITAL OF PARIS: $20,000 · OtherAMERICAN HOSPITAL OF PARISIndividual grant recipient: $16,000 · OtherUNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM- RELIGIOUS ACTION CENTER OF REFORM JUDAISM: $15,000 · Other+10 more: $31,550 · Other+10 moreNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $52,500 · HealthNATIONAL JEWISH HEA…Eisenhower Medical Center: $25,200 · HealthEisenhower Medical …+1 more: $250 · HealthWORLD MONUMENTS FUND INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LES ARTS FLORISSANTS INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureBYRD HOFFMAN WATER MILL FOUNDATION: $4,500 · Arts & CultureANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $16,000 · Civil RightsOCCIDENTAL COLLEGE: $12,500 · EducationDE TOLEDO HIGH SCHOOL: $2,000 · Education+2 more: $750 · EducationU S-UKRAINE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · InternationalSAMBHALI US INC: $5,000 · InternationalVAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Community Improvement
Other$312,550Health$77,950Arts & Culture$19,500Civil Rights$16,000Education$15,250International$15,000Community Improvement$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $52,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEisenhower Medical Center: $25,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $16,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOCCIDENTAL COLLEGE: $12,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetU S-UKRAINE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetWORLD MONUMENTS FUND INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LES ARTS FLORISSANTS INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetVAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAMBHALI US INC: $5,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetBYRD HOFFMAN WATER MILL FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDE TOLEDO HIGH SCHOOL: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Shannon Foundation: $1,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBRIDGES ACADEMY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVote Solar: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROSTITUTION RESEARCH AND EDUCATION: $250 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds Eisenhower Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds U S-UKRAINE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WORLD MONUMENTS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LES ARTS FLORISSANTS INC ↗
  • Who funds VAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAMBHALI US INC ↗
  • Who funds BYRD HOFFMAN WATER MILL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DE TOLEDO HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds The Shannon Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGES ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds Vote Solar ↗
  • Who funds PROSTITUTION RESEARCH AND EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY13.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Arent Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Arent Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Arent’s filings →

    More from the funding graph