Skip to content

· Public charity

Area Resources for Community & Human Services

To improve the lives of greater st.

$28M
Granted FY2025still arriving
47
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$6.8M
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$51MEmployment$27MYouth Development$22MHealth$8.0MCommunity Improvement$6.8MCrime & Legal$6.5MArts & Culture$2.8MHousing & Shelter$2.8MOther$0
02FY2025 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $147k
  • $50k–250k22 grants · $3.1M
  • $250k+15 grants · $25M
$161,306
Median grant
1
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOSTER AND ADOPTIVE CARE COALITION OF EASTERN MISSOURI$6,782,892
URBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS$3,081,302
ANNIE MALONE CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES$3,031,302
UNITED 4 CHILDREN$2,815,688
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF EASTERN MISSOURI$1,767,196
BETTER FAMILY LIFE INC$1,582,639
FATHERS AND FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER$1,197,031
GENERATE HEALTH STL$886,058
EMPLOYMENT CONNECTION$823,983
BRIDGING FAMILIES TO COMMUNITIES AND BEYOND$702,458
THE VILLAGE$453,013
MOKAN CCAC$443,161
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$436,500
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER ST LOUIS$399,246
GENE SLAY'S GIRLS AND BOYS CLUB OF ST LOUIS INC$268,030
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $31.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NORTHEAST MISSOURI CARING COMMUNITIES: $123k → 15%THE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $244k → 16%THE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $200k → 16%THE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $154k → 16%ANNIE MALONE CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES: $3.0M → 21%ANNIE MALONE CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES: $3.0M → 21%ANNIE MALONE CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES: $213k → 21%ANNIE MALONE CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES: $204k → 21%ANNIE MALONE CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES: $200k → 21%ANNIE MALONE CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES: $199k → 21%ANNIE MALONE CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES: $175k → 21%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $590k → 11%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $293k → 11%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $150k → 11%SOUTH SIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $227k → 21%UNITED 4 CHILDREN: $2.8M → 21%SOUTH SIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $224k → 21%UNITED 4 CHILDREN: $2.3M → 21%UNITED 4 CHILDREN: $385k → 21%MARK TWAIN COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $125k → 21%MARK TWAIN COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $125k → 21%MARK TWAIN COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $125k → 21%MARK TWAIN COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $125k → 21%MARK TWAIN COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $123k → 21%MARK TWAIN COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $123k → 21%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSES: $849k → 21%UNLEASING POTENTIAL: $779k → 21%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSES: $760k → 21%UNITED 4 CHILDREN: $742k → 21%MERS GOODWILL: $595k → 21%MERS GOODWILL: $595k → 21%UNLEASING POTENTIAL: $478k → 21%UNLEASING POTENTIAL: $376k → 21%UNLEASING POTENTIAL: $344k → 21%ST LOUIS AGENCY ON TRAINING AND EMPLOYMENT: $134k → 21%ST LOUIS AGENCY ON TRAINING AND EMPLOYMENT: $126k → 21%FATHERS SUPPORT CENTER ST LOUIS: $1.3M → 21%FATHERS AND FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $1.2M → 21%FATHERS SUPPORT CENTER ST LOUIS: $1.2M → 21%MOKAN CCAC: $798k → 21%FATHERS SUPPORT CENTER ST LOUIS: $687k → 21%MOKAN CCAC: $443k → 21%FATHERS SUPPORT CENTER ST LOUIS: $395k → 21%FATHERS SUPPORT CENTER ST LOUIS: $387k → 21%FATHERS SUPPORT CENTER ST LOUIS: $375k → 21%FATHERS SUPPORT CENTER ST LOUIS: $313k → 21%MOKAN CCAC: $302k → 21%FATHERS SUPPORT CENTER ST LOUIS: $276k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$126M · 62 repeat orgs$2.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

62 repeat relationships: 40 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

62
18

Total granted

$126M
$863k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+6%

Still filing today

82%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    FOSTER CARE COALITION OF GREATER ST LOUIS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $28M · revenue +300% · 54% of their budget
  • UL
    URBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS
    8× · 2017–2025 · $13M · revenue +184%
  • BF
    BETTER FAMILY LIFE INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $12M · revenue +3% · 27% of their budget

Funded once

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2022 · $221k
  • 4W
    4 WALLS AND BEYOND
    one grant, 2024 · $193k
  • WR
    WE RISE UP 4 KIDS
    one grant, 2021 · $134k · 96% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Advocacy and Community Training Inc

Enhance the opportunities and quality of life for children and youth with disabilities. the organization achieves this objective through parent training, emotional support, direct advocacy, community education, self-advocacy and navigation…

—
2
St Louis Association of Community Organizations

Community Development and Community Center and social services

—
3
Elevate St Louis

Teaching and mentoring

—
4
Community Builders Network of Metro St Louis

The Community Builders Network of Metro St. Louis (CBN) is a coalition of community building organizations, including both place-based nonprofits and supporting partners. Our mission is to gather community leaders of all backgrounds to…

Community Improvement
5
Behavioral Health Network of Greater St

Behavioral Health Network is a collaborative effort of providers working together to improve our community by leading behavioral health planning and coordination.

Health
6
St Louis Workers Education Society

The St. Louis Workers Education Society (WES) educates and trains St. Louis residents, especially people of color, women and youth, to become community leaders. Our focus is on the intersection of workers rights, racial justice, sexual and…

Human Services
7
Delta Economic Development Corportation

DEDC was created to assist in the development of programs & projects that address specific needs and contribute to improving East St. Louis.

Human Services
8
Edhub Stl

The Education Equity Center of St. Louis advances a regional approach to achieving full racial equity in education by building anti-racist capacity towards systems level practices and policy changes.

Education
9
United Inner City Services Inc

Earlystart carries out its mission "building bridges. inspiring minds. impacting futures." through the earlystart child and family development centers. highly-trained faculty utilize a project-based curriculum in an arts-infused…

Human Services
10
Kids Win Missouri

Kids Win Missouri furthers child well-being by advancing the health, education, safety and development of Missouri children and their families, especially those who are at-risk because of poverty, abuse, neglect, racial inequities or other…

Human Services
11
Forward Through Ferguson

Embracing the ferguson commission's mandate, forward through ferguson centers impacted communities and mobilizes accountable bodies to advance racially equitable systems and policies that ensure all people in the st. louis region can…

Civil Rights
12
Recovery St Louis
Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Better Family Life Inc; the most unlike its peers is Health Literacy Media. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

61 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 61 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

21
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
60/61
Grantees still filing
36/61
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FOSTER CARE COALITION OF GREATER ST LOUIS: $27,951,505 · OtherFOSTER CARE COALITION OF GREATER ST LOUISURBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS: $13,115,260 · OtherURBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUISBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF EASTERN MISSOURI: $7,744,797 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF EASTERN MISSOURIEMPLOYMENT CONNECTION: $3,351,684 · OtherEMPLOYMENT CONNECTION+43 more: $8,649,094 · Other+43 moreAnnie Malone Children and Family Service: $7,257,801 · Human ServicesAnnie Malone Children and Fa…CHILD DAY CARE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS D/B/A UNITED 4 CHILDREN: $6,577,815 · Human ServicesCHILD DAY CARE ASSOCIATION O…FATHERS SUPPORT CENTER ST LOUIS: $6,077,352 · Human ServicesFATHERS SUPPORT CENTER ST LO…UNLEASHING POTENTIAL: $3,587,044 · Human ServicesUNLEASHING POTENTIALMO KAN CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION ASSISTANCE CENTER: $1,542,832 · Human ServicesMERSMISSOURI GOODWILL INDUSTRIES: $1,279,922 · Human ServicesNURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $1,096,877 · Human Services+10 more: $5,176,477 · Human Services+10 moreBETTER FAMILY LIFE INC: $11,832,956 · Community ImprovementBETTER FAMILY…MISSION ST LOUIS: $2,663,780 · Community ImprovementMISSION ST LO…Village: $543,013 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP OF THE OZARKS INC: $536,389 · Community ImprovementProvident Inc: $4,041,121 · HealthHEALTH LITERACY MEDIA: $1,198,222 · HealthGENERATE HEALTH STL: $886,058 · HealthNETWORK FOR STRONG COMMUNITIES: $300,000 · Health+2 more: $228,981 · HealthBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $1,797,800 · Youth DevelopmentMIDTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD OPPORTUNITIES CORP: $1,332,249 · Youth DevelopmentGENE SLAY'S BOYS' CLUB OF ST LOUIS INC: $1,270,695 · Youth DevelopmentExclusive Kids Zone: $292,274 · Youth DevelopmentSPROG INC: $174,250 · Youth Development+2 more: $115,674 · Youth DevelopmentBridging Families to Communities and Beyond: $2,717,449 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY - ST LOUIS: $875,425 · Housing & ShelterRIVERVIEW WEST FLORISSANT HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $564,991 · Housing & ShelterLiving With Purpose Inc: $529,840 · Housing & ShelterENTEAM ORGANIZATION: $170,457 · Housing & ShelterSTRAY DOG THEATRE: $2,752,663 · Arts & Culture
Other$60,812,340Human Services$32,596,120Community Improvement$15,576,138Health$6,654,382Youth Development$4,982,942Housing & Shelter$4,858,162Arts & Culture$2,752,663

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOSTER CARE COALITION OF GREATER ST LOUIS: $27,951,505 over 9y, 54% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS: $13,115,260 over 8y, 5.1% of budgetBETTER FAMILY LIFE INC: $11,832,956 over 8y, 27% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF EASTERN MISSOURI: $7,744,797 over 9y, 24% of budgetAnnie Malone Children and Family Service: $7,257,801 over 9y, 66% of budgetCHILD DAY CARE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS D/B/A UNITED 4 CHILDREN: $6,577,815 over 9y, 45% of budgetFATHERS SUPPORT CENTER ST LOUIS: $6,077,352 over 9y, 27% of budgetProvident Inc: $4,041,121 over 7y, 13% of budgetUNLEASHING POTENTIAL: $3,587,044 over 6y, 22% of budgetEMPLOYMENT CONNECTION: $3,351,684 over 7y, 15% of budgetSTRAY DOG THEATRE: $2,752,663 over 8y, 65% of budgetBridging Families to Communities and Beyond: $2,717,449 over 6y, 61% of budgetMISSION ST LOUIS: $2,663,780 over 7y, 8.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $1,797,800 over 9y, 4.8% of budgetAMANDA LUCKETT MURPHY HOPEWELL CENTER INC: $1,576,075 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetMO KAN CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION ASSISTANCE CENTER: $1,542,832 over 3y, 40% of budgetMIDTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD OPPORTUNITIES CORP: $1,332,249 over 7y, 40% of budgetMERSMISSOURI GOODWILL INDUSTRIES: $1,279,922 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetGENE SLAY'S BOYS' CLUB OF ST LOUIS INC: $1,270,695 over 9y, 15% of budgetHEALTH LITERACY MEDIA: $1,198,222 over 9y, 13% of budgetNURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $1,096,877 over 4y, 13% of budgetMARK TWAIN COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $1,067,045 over 9y, 100% of budgetST LOUIS ARC INC: $926,609 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetGENERATE HEALTH STL: $886,058 over 1y, 45% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY - ST LOUIS: $875,425 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetNEW MADRID CO HUMAN RESOURCES COUNCIL COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $742,715 over 4y, 15% of budgetHOUSING OPTIONS PROVIDED FOR THE ELDERLY INCORPORATED: $674,304 over 3y, 28% of budgetGATEWAY ALLIANCE AGAINST HUMAN TRAFFICKING: $668,470 over 3y, 47% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $660,918 over 4y, 17% of budgetNORTHSIDE YOUTH AND SENIOR SERVICE CENTER INC: $627,191 over 9y, 7.4% of budgetTHE YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER: $585,250 over 5y, 13% of budgetRIVERVIEW WEST FLORISSANT HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $564,991 over 4y, 35% of budgetVillage: $543,013 over 2y, 29% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP OF THE OZARKS INC: $536,389 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetLiving With Purpose Inc: $529,840 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetSOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $451,644 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetCRIME VICTIM ADVOCACY CENTER OF ST LOUIS: $392,970 over 5y, 8.4% of budgetNORTHEAST MISSOURI CARING COMMUNITIESINC: $304,707 over 4y, 32% of budgetNETWORK FOR STRONG COMMUNITIES: $300,000 over 3y, 20% of budgetCommunity of Hope: $279,125 over 3y, 80% of budgetALIVE AND WELL COMMUNITIES: $269,500 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetGREAT CIRCLE: $231,375 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBETTY JEAN KERR PEOPLE'S HEALTH CENTERS: $215,981 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSPROG INC: $174,250 over 5y, 20% of budgetENTEAM ORGANIZATION: $170,457 over 5y, 72% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FIRST: $142,708 over 3y, 9.5% of budgetWE RISE UP 4 KIDS: $134,344 over 1y, 96% of budgetThe Sophia Project Inc: $134,179 over 4y, 20% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOSTER CARE COALITION OF GREATER ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds BETTER FAMILY LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF EASTERN MISSOURI ↗
  • Who funds Annie Malone Children and Family Service ↗
  • Who funds CHILD DAY CARE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS D/B/A UNITED 4 CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds FATHERS SUPPORT CENTER ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds Provident Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNLEASHING POTENTIAL ↗
  • Who funds EMPLOYMENT CONNECTION ↗
  • Who funds STRAY DOG THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds Bridging Families to Communities and Beyond ↗
  • Who funds MISSION ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMANDA LUCKETT MURPHY HOPEWELL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MO KAN CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION ASSISTANCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MIDTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD OPPORTUNITIES CORP ↗
  • Who funds MERSMISSOURI GOODWILL INDUSTRIES ↗
  • Who funds GENE SLAY'S BOYS' CLUB OF ST LOUIS INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH LITERACY MEDIA ↗
  • Who funds NURSES FOR NEWBORNS ↗
  • Who funds MARK TWAIN COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS ARC INC ↗
  • Who funds GENERATE HEALTH STL ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds NEW MADRID CO HUMAN RESOURCES COUNCIL COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING OPTIONS PROVIDED FOR THE ELDERLY INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds GATEWAY ALLIANCE AGAINST HUMAN TRAFFICKING ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds NORTHSIDE YOUTH AND SENIOR SERVICE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds RIVERVIEW WEST FLORISSANT HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Village ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP OF THE OZARKS INC ↗
  • Who funds Living With Purpose Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CRIME VICTIM ADVOCACY CENTER OF ST LOUIS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO59× affinity31 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Norman J Stupp Foundation · St Louis Philanthropic Organization · St Louis Community Foundation · Youthbridge Community Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation · Pott Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · Generate Health Stl

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Area Resources for Community & Human Services funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Area Resources for Community & Human Services. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 87 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Area Resources for Community & Human Services’ filings →

    More from the funding graph