Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Area Resources for Community & Human Services

To improve the lives of greater st.

$28M
Granted FY2025still arriving
47
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$6.8M
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 47% of AREA RESOURCES FOR COMMUNITY & HUMAN SERVICES’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $147k
  • $50k–250k22 grants · $3.1M
  • $250k+15 grants · $25M
$161,306
Median grant
1
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOSTER AND ADOPTIVE CARE COALITION OF EASTERN MISSOURI$6,782,892
URBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS$3,081,302
ANNIE MALONE CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES$3,031,302
UNITED 4 CHILDREN$2,815,688
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF EASTERN MISSOURI$1,767,196
BETTER FAMILY LIFE INC$1,582,639
FATHERS AND FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER$1,197,031
GENERATE HEALTH STL$886,058
EMPLOYMENT CONNECTION$823,983
BRIDGING FAMILIES TO COMMUNITIES AND BEYOND$702,458
THE VILLAGE$453,013
MOKAN CCAC$443,161
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$436,500
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER ST LOUIS$399,246
GENE SLAY'S GIRLS AND BOYS CLUB OF ST LOUIS INC$268,030
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $31.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NORTHEAST MISSOURI CARING COMMUNITIES: $123k → 15%THE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $244k → 16%THE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $200k → 16%THE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $154k → 16%ANNIE MALONE CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES: $3.0M → 21%ANNIE MALONE CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES: $3.0M → 21%ANNIE MALONE CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES: $213k → 21%ANNIE MALONE CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES: $204k → 21%ANNIE MALONE CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES: $200k → 21%ANNIE MALONE CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES: $199k → 21%ANNIE MALONE CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES: $175k → 21%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $590k → 11%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $293k → 11%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $150k → 11%SOUTH SIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $227k → 21%UNITED 4 CHILDREN: $2.8M → 21%SOUTH SIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER: $224k → 21%UNITED 4 CHILDREN: $2.3M → 21%UNITED 4 CHILDREN: $385k → 21%MARK TWAIN COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $125k → 21%MARK TWAIN COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $125k → 21%MARK TWAIN COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $125k → 21%MARK TWAIN COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $125k → 21%MARK TWAIN COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $123k → 21%MARK TWAIN COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $123k → 21%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSES: $849k → 21%UNLEASING POTENTIAL: $779k → 21%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSES: $760k → 21%UNITED 4 CHILDREN: $742k → 21%MERS GOODWILL: $595k → 21%MERS GOODWILL: $595k → 21%UNLEASING POTENTIAL: $478k → 21%UNLEASING POTENTIAL: $376k → 21%UNLEASING POTENTIAL: $344k → 21%ST LOUIS AGENCY ON TRAINING AND EMPLOYMENT: $134k → 21%ST LOUIS AGENCY ON TRAINING AND EMPLOYMENT: $126k → 21%FATHERS SUPPORT CENTER ST LOUIS: $1.3M → 21%FATHERS AND FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $1.2M → 21%FATHERS SUPPORT CENTER ST LOUIS: $1.2M → 21%MOKAN CCAC: $798k → 21%FATHERS SUPPORT CENTER ST LOUIS: $687k → 21%MOKAN CCAC: $443k → 21%FATHERS SUPPORT CENTER ST LOUIS: $395k → 21%FATHERS SUPPORT CENTER ST LOUIS: $387k → 21%FATHERS SUPPORT CENTER ST LOUIS: $375k → 21%FATHERS SUPPORT CENTER ST LOUIS: $313k → 21%MOKAN CCAC: $302k → 21%FATHERS SUPPORT CENTER ST LOUIS: $276k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$126M · 62 repeat orgs$2.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +13% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

62 repeat relationships — 40 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

62
18

Total granted

$126M
$863k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+6%

Still filing today

82%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    FOSTER CARE COALITION OF GREATER ST LOUIS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $28M · revenue +300% · 54% of their budget
  • UL
    URBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS
    8× · 2017–2025 · $13M · revenue +184%
  • BF
    BETTER FAMILY LIFE INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $12M · revenue +3% · 27% of their budget

Funded once

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2022 · $221k
  • 4W
    4 WALLS AND BEYOND
    one grant, 2024 · $193k
  • WR
    WE RISE UP 4 KIDS
    one grant, 2021 · $134k · 96% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Advocacy and Community Training Inc

Enhance the opportunities and quality of life for children and youth with disabilities. the organization achieves this objective through parent training, emotional support, direct advocacy, community education, self-advocacy and navigation…

2
St Louis Association of Community Organizations

Community Development and Community Center and social services

3
Community Builders Network of Metro St Louis

The Community Builders Network of Metro St. Louis (CBN) is a coalition of community building organizations, including both place-based nonprofits and supporting partners. Our mission is to gather community leaders of all backgrounds to…

Community Improvement
4
Elevate St Louis

Teaching and mentoring

5
Behavioral Health Network of Greater St

Behavioral Health Network is a collaborative effort of providers working together to improve our community by leading behavioral health planning and coordination.

Health
6
St Louis Workers Education Society

The St. Louis Workers Education Society (WES) educates and trains St. Louis residents, especially people of color, women and youth, to become community leaders. Our focus is on the intersection of workers rights, racial justice, sexual and…

Human Services
7
Edhub Stl

The Education Equity Center of St. Louis advances a regional approach to achieving full racial equity in education by building anti-racist capacity towards systems level practices and policy changes.

Education
8
Delta Economic Development Corportation

DEDC was created to assist in the development of programs & projects that address specific needs and contribute to improving East St. Louis.

Human Services
9
Forward Through Ferguson

Embracing the ferguson commission's mandate, forward through ferguson centers impacted communities and mobilizes accountable bodies to advance racially equitable systems and policies that ensure all people in the st. louis region can…

Civil Rights
10
United Inner City Services Inc

Earlystart carries out its mission "building bridges. inspiring minds. impacting futures." through the earlystart child and family development centers. highly-trained faculty utilize a project-based curriculum in an arts-infused…

Human Services
11
Kids Win Missouri

Kids Win Missouri furthers child well-being by advancing the health, education, safety and development of Missouri children and their families, especially those who are at-risk because of poverty, abuse, neglect, racial inequities or other…

Human Services
12
Recovery St Louis
Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Better Family Life Inc and the most unlike its peers is Health Literacy Media. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%3%<5yr13%12%5–10yr16%30%10–20yr16%16%20–35yr17%20%35–55yr19%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr13%2%5–10yr16%10%10–20yr16%11%20–35yr17%49%35–55yr19%29%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 5% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
5%
4/73
the rest of the field
14%
1,450/10,084

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

61 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 61 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

20
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
60/61
Grantees still filing
38/61
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FOSTER CARE COALITION OF GREATER ST LOUIS — $27,951,505 · OtherFOSTER CARE COALITION OF GREATER ST LOUISURBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS — $13,115,260 · OtherURBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUISBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF EASTERN MISSOURI — $7,744,797 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF EASTERN MISSOURIEMPLOYMENT CONNECTION — $3,351,684 · OtherEMPLOYMENT CONNECTION+43 more — $8,649,094 · Other+43 moreAnnie Malone Children and Family Service — $7,257,801 · Human ServicesAnnie Malone Children and Fa…CHILD DAY CARE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS D/B/A UNITED 4 CHILDREN — $6,577,815 · Human ServicesCHILD DAY CARE ASSOCIATION O…FATHERS SUPPORT CENTER ST LOUIS — $6,077,352 · Human ServicesFATHERS SUPPORT CENTER ST LO…UNLEASHING POTENTIAL — $3,587,044 · Human ServicesUNLEASHING POTENTIALMO KAN CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION ASSISTANCE CENTER — $1,542,832 · Human ServicesMERSMISSOURI GOODWILL INDUSTRIES — $1,279,922 · Human ServicesNURSES FOR NEWBORNS — $1,096,877 · Human Services+10 more — $5,176,477 · Human Services+10 moreBETTER FAMILY LIFE INC — $11,832,956 · Community ImprovementBETTER FAMILY…MISSION ST LOUIS — $2,663,780 · Community ImprovementMISSION ST LO…Village — $543,013 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP OF THE OZARKS INC — $536,389 · Community ImprovementProvident Inc — $4,041,121 · HealthHEALTH LITERACY MEDIA — $1,198,222 · HealthGENERATE HEALTH STL — $886,058 · HealthNETWORK FOR STRONG COMMUNITIES — $300,000 · Health+2 more — $228,981 · HealthBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC — $1,797,800 · Youth DevelopmentMIDTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD OPPORTUNITIES CORP — $1,332,249 · Youth DevelopmentGENE SLAY'S BOYS' CLUB OF ST LOUIS INC — $1,270,695 · Youth DevelopmentExclusive Kids Zone — $292,274 · Youth DevelopmentSPROG INC — $174,250 · Youth Development+2 more — $115,674 · Youth DevelopmentBridging Families to Communities and Beyond — $2,717,449 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY - ST LOUIS — $875,425 · Housing & ShelterRIVERVIEW WEST FLORISSANT HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $564,991 · Housing & ShelterLiving With Purpose Inc — $529,840 · Housing & ShelterENTEAM ORGANIZATION — $170,457 · Housing & ShelterSTRAY DOG THEATRE — $2,752,663 · Arts & Culture
Other$60,812,340Human Services$32,596,120Community Improvement$15,576,138Health$6,654,382Youth Development$4,982,942Housing & Shelter$4,858,162Arts & Culture$2,752,663

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFOSTER CARE COALITION OF GREATER ST LOUIS — $27,951,505 over 9y, 54% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS — $13,115,260 over 8y, 5.1% of budgetBETTER FAMILY LIFE INC — $11,832,956 over 8y, 27% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF EASTERN MISSOURI — $7,744,797 over 9y, 19% of budgetAnnie Malone Children and Family Service — $7,257,801 over 9y, 66% of budgetCHILD DAY CARE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS D/B/A UNITED 4 CHILDREN — $6,577,815 over 9y, 27% of budgetFATHERS SUPPORT CENTER ST LOUIS — $6,077,352 over 9y, 27% of budgetProvident Inc — $4,041,121 over 7y, 13% of budgetUNLEASHING POTENTIAL — $3,587,044 over 6y, 22% of budgetEMPLOYMENT CONNECTION — $3,351,684 over 7y, 15% of budgetSTRAY DOG THEATRE — $2,752,663 over 8y, 65% of budgetBridging Families to Communities and Beyond — $2,717,449 over 6y, 61% of budgetMISSION ST LOUIS — $2,663,780 over 7y, 8.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC — $1,797,800 over 9y, 4.8% of budgetAMANDA LUCKETT MURPHY HOPEWELL CENTER INC — $1,576,075 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetMO KAN CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION ASSISTANCE CENTER — $1,542,832 over 3y, 40% of budgetMIDTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD OPPORTUNITIES CORP — $1,332,249 over 7y, 40% of budgetMERSMISSOURI GOODWILL INDUSTRIES — $1,279,922 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetGENE SLAY'S BOYS' CLUB OF ST LOUIS INC — $1,270,695 over 9y, 15% of budgetHEALTH LITERACY MEDIA — $1,198,222 over 9y, 13% of budgetNURSES FOR NEWBORNS — $1,096,877 over 4y, 13% of budgetMARK TWAIN COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER — $1,067,045 over 9y, 100% of budgetST LOUIS ARC INC — $926,609 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY - ST LOUIS — $875,425 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetNEW MADRID CO HUMAN RESOURCES COUNCIL COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP — $742,715 over 4y, 15% of budgetHOUSING OPTIONS PROVIDED FOR THE ELDERLY INCORPORATED — $674,304 over 3y, 28% of budgetGATEWAY ALLIANCE AGAINST HUMAN TRAFFICKING — $668,470 over 3y, 47% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP — $660,918 over 4y, 17% of budgetNORTHSIDE YOUTH AND SENIOR SERVICE CENTER INC — $627,191 over 9y, 7.4% of budgetTHE YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER — $585,250 over 5y, 13% of budgetRIVERVIEW WEST FLORISSANT HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $564,991 over 4y, 35% of budgetVillage — $543,013 over 2y, 29% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP OF THE OZARKS INC — $536,389 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetLiving With Purpose Inc — $529,840 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetSOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER — $451,644 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetCRIME VICTIM ADVOCACY CENTER OF ST LOUIS — $392,970 over 5y, 8.4% of budgetNORTHEAST MISSOURI CARING COMMUNITIESINC — $304,707 over 4y, 32% of budgetNETWORK FOR STRONG COMMUNITIES — $300,000 over 3y, 20% of budgetCommunity of Hope — $279,125 over 3y, 80% of budgetALIVE AND WELL COMMUNITIES — $269,500 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetGREAT CIRCLE — $231,375 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBETTY JEAN KERR PEOPLE'S HEALTH CENTERS — $215,981 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSPROG INC — $174,250 over 5y, 20% of budgetENTEAM ORGANIZATION — $170,457 over 5y, 72% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FIRST — $142,708 over 3y, 9.5% of budgetWE RISE UP 4 KIDS — $134,344 over 1y, 96% of budgetThe Sophia Project Inc — $134,179 over 4y, 20% of budgetST LOUIS METRO GATEWAY NSBE JR MIDWEST INSTITUTE FOR ST — $106,074 over 1y, 73% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FOSTER CARE COALITION OF GREATER ST LOUIS
  • Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS
  • Who funds BETTER FAMILY LIFE INC
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF EASTERN MISSOURI
  • Who funds Annie Malone Children and Family Service
  • Who funds CHILD DAY CARE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS D/B/A UNITED 4 CHILDREN
  • Who funds FATHERS SUPPORT CENTER ST LOUIS
  • Who funds Provident Inc
  • Who funds UNLEASHING POTENTIAL
  • Who funds EMPLOYMENT CONNECTION
  • Who funds STRAY DOG THEATRE
  • Who funds Bridging Families to Communities and Beyond
  • Who funds MISSION ST LOUIS
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC
  • Who funds AMANDA LUCKETT MURPHY HOPEWELL CENTER INC
  • Who funds MO KAN CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION ASSISTANCE CENTER
  • Who funds MIDTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD OPPORTUNITIES CORP
  • Who funds MERSMISSOURI GOODWILL INDUSTRIES
  • Who funds GENE SLAY'S BOYS' CLUB OF ST LOUIS INC
  • Who funds HEALTH LITERACY MEDIA
  • Who funds NURSES FOR NEWBORNS
  • Who funds MARK TWAIN COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER
  • Who funds ST LOUIS ARC INC
  • Who funds GENERATE HEALTH STL
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - ST LOUIS
  • Who funds NEW MADRID CO HUMAN RESOURCES COUNCIL COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP
  • Who funds HOUSING OPTIONS PROVIDED FOR THE ELDERLY INCORPORATED
  • Who funds GATEWAY ALLIANCE AGAINST HUMAN TRAFFICKING
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP
  • Who funds NORTHSIDE YOUTH AND SENIOR SERVICE CENTER INC
  • Who funds THE YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER
  • Who funds RIVERVIEW WEST FLORISSANT HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
  • Who funds Village
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP OF THE OZARKS INC
  • Who funds Living With Purpose Inc
  • Who funds SOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER
  • Who funds CRIME VICTIM ADVOCACY CENTER OF ST LOUIS

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO59× affinity31 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Norman J Stupp Foundation · St Louis Philanthropic Organization · St Louis Community Foundation · Youthbridge Community Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation · Pott Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · Generate Health Stl

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Area Resources for Community & Human Services funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 87 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph