Skip to content
Archstone Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Archstone Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
68
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$242k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$4.6MEducation$3.3MHuman Services$3.1MSocial Science$662kFood & Nutrition$313kYouth Development$295kPhilanthropy$238kHousing & Shelter$233kOther$0
02FY2025 · 68 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k26 grants · $51k
  • $10k–50k24 grants · $476k
  • $50k–250k18 grants · $1.8M
$15,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$123M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION$242,072
RAND CORPORATION$169,803
THE SCAN FOUNDATION$150,000
JUSTICE IN AGING$142,500
GRANTMAKERS IN AGING INC$125,000
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON$124,400
THE UCLA FOUNDATION$100,000
CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$100,000
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO$100,000
PURCHASER BUSINESS GROUP ON HEALTH$75,926
PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE$75,000
ALZHEIMER'S GREATER LOS ANGELES$67,500
AMERICAN SOCIETY ON AGING$58,500
NATIONAL ASIAN PACIFIC CENTER ON AGING (NAPCA)$50,000
THE GERONTOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $2.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MEALS ON WHEELS DIABLO REGION: $25k → 9%THE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $10k → 9%INSTITUTE ON AGING: $25k → 10%ELDERHELP OF SAN DIEGO: $25k → 11%EL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $49k → 14%GRANTMAKERS IN AGING INC: $125k → 9%BENJAMIN ROSE INSTITUTE ON AGING: $36k → 17%GRANTMAKERS IN AGING INC: $113k → 7%MEALS ON WHEELS DIABLO REGION: $25k → 9%EL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $19k → 14%GRANTMAKERS IN AGING INC: $113k → 9%BENJAMIN ROSE INSTITUTE ON AGING: $23k → 17%GRANTMAKERS IN AGING INC: $113k → 7%EL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $8k → 14%GRANTMAKERS IN AGING INC: $95k → 9%BENJAMIN ROSE INSTITUTE ON AGING: $12k → 17%GRANTMAKERS IN AGING INC: $13k → 7%GRANTMAKERS IN AGING INC: $50k → 9%BENJAMIN ROSE INSTITUTE ON AGING: $4k → 17%GRANTMAKERS IN AGING INC: $48k → 9%GRANTMAKERS IN AGING INC: $38k → 9%CENTER FOR EMPOWERING REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS (CERI): $45k → 10%GRANTMAKERS IN AGING INC: $30k → 9%AMERICAN SOCIETY ON AGING: $45k → 10%GRANTMAKERS IN AGING INC: $25k → 9%CENTER FOR EMPOWERING REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS (CERI): $5k → 10%GRANTMAKERS IN AGING INC: $25k → 9%AMERICAN SOCIETY ON AGING: $45k → 10%GRANTMAKERS IN AGING INC: $13k → 9%GRANTMAKERS IN AGING INC: $13k → 9%GRANTMAKERS IN AGING INC: $11k → 9%WATTS LABOR COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE: $25k → 14%WATTS LABOR COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE: $20k → 14%WATTS LABOR COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE: $5k → 14%SAAHAS FOR CAUSE: $45k → 14%SAAHAS FOR CAUSE: $5k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC: $23k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC: $5k → 14%THE SCAN FOUNDATION: $150k → 14%THE SCAN FOUNDATION: $150k → 14%THE SCAN FOUNDATION: $150k → 14%THE SCAN FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%THE SCAN FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%THE SCAN FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%THE SCAN FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%THE SCAN FOUNDATION: $14k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMENS CENTER: $45k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMENS CENTER: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
OH
CA
VA
MD
DE
DC
LA
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 11% of Archstone Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 66% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 69%.

Archstone Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$11M · 83 repeat orgs$963k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

83 repeat relationships: 36 still active in FY2025, 47 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

83
59

Total granted

$11M
$565k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+8%

Still filing today

72%
49%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $398k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GI
    GRANTMAKERS IN AGING INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $821k · revenue +48%
  • PI
    PARTNERS IN CARE FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $510k · revenue +138%
  • Public Health Institute
    4× · 2022–2025 · $510k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • CH
    CALIFORNIA HEALTH POLICY STRATEGIES LLC
    one grant, 2024 · $235k
  • LA
    L A NET COMMUNITY HEALTH RESOURCE NETWORKgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +141% · 28% of their budget
  • MP
    MANATT PHELPS & PHILLIPS LLP
    one grant, 2023 · $75k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
2
Council on Aging Services for Seniors

To enhance the quality of life for our aging community by providing services that promote wellbeing and maintain independence.

—
3
Health Projects Center

Health Projects Center supports people as they age to live safely at home by delivering high quality services and programs in the Monterey Bay Region.

Crime & Legal
4
Asian Health Services

Asian Health Services (AHS) provides a continuum of medical care, mental health care, dental care and other healthcare services for all, including health education; perinatal services; behavioral health; family and youth services;…

Health
5
Community Clinic Association of Los Angeles County

Ccalac empowers community health centers to remain at the forefront of health care transformation. we forge partnerships, foster innovation, promote health equity, and advocate for the communities they serve.

Health
6
Agewell Pace

To promote community health and otherwise support the charitable purposes of its members, lifelong medical care and santa rosa community health centers, california nonprofit public benefit corporations, by providing a program of…

Health
7
Laguna Beach Community Clinic

The mission of laguna beach community clinic (lbcc) is to provide excellent medical care regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
8
Scan Health Plan

Scan's mission is to keep seniors healthy and independent.

Health
9
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
10
South Central Family Health Center

To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.

Health
11
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
12
The California Channel

To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Seniorserv Inc; the most unlike its peers is K9 Kismet Dog Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

114 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 114 of the 167 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
18
Early backer (in before they grew)
112/114
Grantees still filing
70/114
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $1,729,149 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION: $570,472 · OtherALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATIONTHE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $558,153 · OtherTHE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANC…CATCHAFIRE: $412,500 · OtherCATCHAFIRESERVICES AND ADVOCACY FOR GAY LESBIAN BISEXUAL AND TRANSGENDER ELDERS INC: $350,000 · OtherSERVICES AND ADVOCACY FOR GAY LESBIAN BISEXUAL AND TR…GERONTOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA: $238,429 · OtherCALIFORNIA HEALTH POLICY STRATEGIES LLC: $235,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $231,867 · OtherJUSTICE IN AGING: $210,500 · Other+87 more: $1,584,803 · Other+87 moreGRANTMAKERS IN AGING INC: $820,500 · Human ServicesGRANTMAKERS IN AGIN…THE SCAN FOUNDATION: $739,100 · Human ServicesTHE SCAN FOUNDATIONAMERICAN SOCIETY ON AGING: $212,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN SOCIETY ON…EL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $80,000 · Human Services+17 more: $426,016 · Human Services+17 morePARTNERS IN CARE FOUNDATION: $510,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN CARE F…Public Health Institute: $510,000 · HealthPublic Health Inst…ALZHEIMERS GREATER LOS ANGELES: $205,606 · HealthALZHEIMERS GREATER…COALITION FOR COMPASSIONATE CARE OF CALIFORNIA: $136,494 · HealthCOALITION FOR COMP…VIA CARE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $100,000 · HealthL A NET COMMUNITY HEALTH RESOURCE NETWORK: $100,000 · HealthKAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS: $89,903 · HealthPURCHASER BUSINESS GROUP ON HEALTH: $75,926 · Health+17 more: $390,823 · Health+17 moreUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $514,198 · EducationUNIVERSITY …UCLA FOUNDATION: $460,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDA…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $100,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY …CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LOS ANGELES AUXILIARY SERVICES INC: $57,174 · EducationVISION Y COMPROMISO: $50,000 · EducationCommunity Tech Network: $50,000 · EducationSOMANG SOCIETY: $50,000 · Education+7 more: $28,120 · EducationThe Rand Corporation: $661,903 · Public BenefitCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $100,000 · PhilanthropyGRANTMAKERS IN HEALTH: $85,769 · PhilanthropyTHE CENTER FOR EFFECTIVE PHILANTHROPY INC: $45,000 · PhilanthropySADDLEBACK MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $44,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $8,800 · PhilanthropyLEADINGAGE CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION: $125,000 · Housing & ShelterCORPORATION FOR SUPPORTIVE HOUSING: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterLTSC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $50,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $2,500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$6,120,873Human Services$2,277,616Health$2,118,752Education$1,309,492Public Benefit$661,903Philanthropy$283,569Housing & Shelter$227,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGRANTMAKERS IN AGING INC: $820,500 over 5y, 14% of budgetTHE SCAN FOUNDATION: $739,100 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetThe Rand Corporation: $661,903 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $514,198 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN CARE FOUNDATION: $510,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetPublic Health Institute: $510,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $460,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSERVICES AND ADVOCACY FOR GAY LESBIAN BISEXUAL AND TRANSGENDER ELDERS INC: $350,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetGERONTOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA: $238,429 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY ON AGING: $212,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetJUSTICE IN AGING: $210,500 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetALZHEIMERS GREATER LOS ANGELES: $205,606 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetProject Open Hand: $140,112 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCOALITION FOR COMPASSIONATE CARE OF CALIFORNIA: $136,494 over 4y, 5.4% of budgetNational Asian Pacific Center on Aging: $125,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLEADINGAGE CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION: $125,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetVIA CARE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $100,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetL A NET COMMUNITY HEALTH RESOURCE NETWORK: $100,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTHCARE: $90,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS: $89,903 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGRANTMAKERS IN HEALTH: $85,769 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetEL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $80,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBENJAMIN ROSE INSTITUTE: $75,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetONEGENERATION: $64,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetALZHEIMER'S ORANGE COUNTY: $60,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LOS ANGELES AUXILIARY SERVICES INC: $57,174 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $50,100 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSAAHAS FOR CAUSE: $50,100 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT ANGEL FOOD: $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCalifornia Aquatic Therapy & Wellness Center Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetCHOICE IN AGING: $50,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetVISION Y COMPROMISO: $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCORPORATION FOR SUPPORTIVE HOUSING: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLTSC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH INITIATIVE OF OC: $50,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetNATIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Tech Network: $50,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCENTER FOR EMPOWERING REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS: $50,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetHumboldt Senior Resource Center: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSOMANG SOCIETY: $50,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS DIABLO REGION: $50,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWATTS LABOR COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR EFFECTIVE PHILANTHROPY INC: $45,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSADDLEBACK MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $44,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetST BARNABAS SENIOR CENTER OF LOS ANGELES: $34,540 over 2y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GRANTMAKERS IN AGING INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SCAN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Rand Corporation ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN CARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Public Health Institute ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SERVICES AND ADVOCACY FOR GAY LESBIAN BISEXUAL AND TRANSGENDER ELDERS INC ↗
  • Who funds GERONTOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds JUSTICE IN AGING ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMERS GREATER LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds Project Open Hand ↗
  • Who funds COALITION FOR COMPASSIONATE CARE OF CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds National Asian Pacific Center on Aging ↗
  • Who funds LEADINGAGE CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VIA CARE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds L A NET COMMUNITY HEALTH RESOURCE NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTHCARE ↗
  • Who funds KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ↗
  • Who funds GRANTMAKERS IN HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds EL SOL NEIGHBORHOOD EDUCATIONAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PURCHASER BUSINESS GROUP ON HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds BENJAMIN ROSE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds ONEGENERATION ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S ORANGE COUNTY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Scan Health PlanCalifornia Healthcare…Kaiser Foundation Hos…California Community …The California Wellne…The Ralph M Parsons F…Weingart FoundationThe Scan FoundationThe California Endowm…Farmers & Merchants B…California Physicians…Earl B & Loraine H Mi…
Scan Health PlanCA48.1× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Scan Health Plan · California Healthcare Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · California Community Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Weingart Foundation · The Scan Foundation · The California Endowment · Farmers & Merchants Bank Foundation · California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · Earl B & Loraine H Miller Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Archstone Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Archstone Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Southern Oregon Center for Community Partnerships: 15% of income from government
  • The Strathmore Hall Foundation Inc: 7% of income from government
  • The Center for Effective Philanthropy Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
41report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Archstone Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Archstone Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 167 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Archstone’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home