· Public charity
Pikeville Medical Center Inc
The center's mission is to advance the health and well-being of our region through comprehensive care in a christian environment.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 6 grants below total $183,462 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $384,536 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $201,074 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k5 grants · $83k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SHAPING OUR APPALACHIAN REGION INC | $100,000 |
| CITY OF PIKEVILLE | $25,000 |
| SOUTHEAST KENTUCKY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE | $16,250 |
| CEDAR INC | $15,545 |
| PIKEVILLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS | $14,167 |
| KENTUCKY CHAMBER FOUNDATION | $12,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 29%, against an area that typically sits at 19%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SOSHAPING OUR APPALACHIAN REGION INC2× · 2022–2024 · $107k · revenue +249%
- PCPIKE COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE4× · 2017–2024 · $55k · revenue +79%
- KCKentucky Chamber Foundation Inc3× · 2021–2024 · $28k · revenue +27%
Funded once
- COCOMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKYone grant, 2021 · $75k
- CACHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $11k · revenue +34%
- FAFIVCO AREA DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTone grant, 2023 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Development and educational opportunities to promote industrial and economic development in kentucky.
Our purpose is to educate, advocate and connect with our members on issues that are important to the economic development in the commonwealth of kentucky.
None
To facilitate the economic growth and development of the southern kentucky region.
To actively search for new companies and industries to locate in the mayfield, ky and graves county, ky area for economic development.
Economic Development and Tourism Promotion in Eastern Kentucky
Our mission is to promote and support the development of strong businesses and a vibrant economy in the northern kentucky region, through leadership and advocacy, resulting in a better quality of life for all.
To create an environment which supports existing business expansion and retention and to recruit new businesses and industry.
The Campbell County Chamber of Commerce seeks to unite all the industrial, commercial, and civic interests in Campbell County; to coordinate the efforts of commerce, industrial, and civic interest in maintaining and strengthening a sound…
To advocate programs providing assistance to persons in low income environments to have adequate food, shelter, healthcare, education, water, waste and a sustainable home.
Embracing our past, empowering our people, and unlocking our future by developing a tourism industry cluster, and revitalizing our communities in the coalfields of eastern kentucky
The Southern Kentucky Chamber of Commerce primary mission is to keep their members informed of current events and law changes that effect their businesses. They also support an educational effort to high school students to make them better…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kentucky Chamber Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cowan Community Action Group Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SHAPING OUR APPALACHIAN REGION INC ↗
- Who funds ONE EAST KENTUCKY CORPORATION ONE EAST KENTUCKY ↗
- Who funds PIKE COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds CEDAR INC ↗
- Who funds Kentucky Chamber Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds CHALLENGER LEARNING CENTER OF KENTUCKY INC ↗
- Who funds COWAN COMMUNITY ACTION GROUP INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Steele-Reese Foundation Xxxxx1004 · Foundation for Appalachian Kentucky Inc · Appalachian Regional Healthcare · Charities Aid Foundation America
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Pikeville Medical Center Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.