Skip to content
Apla Health & Wellness at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Apla Health & Wellness

Apla health restores dignity and trust within underserved communities by providing world-class lgbtq+ empowering healthcare, hiv specialty care, food, housing and other essential support services.

$6.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$63k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$689kCrime & Legal$37kEducation$18kCivil Rights$15k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $110,999, the rows itemized in this filing. The $6,310,856 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $6,199,857 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $42k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $63k
$13,257
Median grant
2
States reached
$83M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AIDS UNITED$63,287
BEING ALIVEPEOPLE WITH AIDS ACTION COALITION INC$19,190
PROJECT ANGEL FOOD$13,257
SAN FRANCISCO AIDS FOUNDATION$10,000
SABAN COMMUNITY CLINIC$5,265
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE LIFE GROUP LA INC: $6k → 10%SAN FRANCISCO AIDS FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%BEING ALIVE PEOPLE LIVING WHIVAIDS ACTION COALIT: $24k → 14%AIDS UNITED: $89k → 14%NAESM INC: $7k → 13%BEING ALIVE: $13k → 14%AIDS UNITED: $55k → 14%BEING ALIVE PEOPLE LIVING WHIVAIDS ACTION COALIT: $6k → 14%AIDS UNITED: $35k → 14%THE LIFE GROUP LA: $6k → 14%AIDS UNITED: $18k → 14%PROJECT ANGEL FOOD: $19k → 14%AIDS UNITED: $18k → 14%PROJECT ANGEL FOOD: $17k → 14%AIDS UNITED: $69k → 14%PROJECT ANGEL FOOD: $17k → 14%HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN: $15k → 14%PROJECT ANGEL FOOD: $16k → 14%AIDS UNITED: $63k → 14%PROJECT ANGEL FOOD: $13k → 14%PROJECT ANGEL FOOD: $13k → 14%PROJECT ANGEL FOOD: $10k → 14%SABAN COMMUNITY CLINIC: $5k → 14%ELIZABETH TAYLOR AIDS FOUNDATION: $42k → 14%ELIZABETH TAYLOR AIDS FOUNDATION: $23k → 14%OUTFEST: $30k → 14%OUTFEST: $10k → 14%LACBA AIDS LEGAL SERVICES PROJECTS: $11k → 14%LACBA AIDS LEGAL SERVICES PROJECTS: $7k → 14%LACBA AIDS LEGAL SERVICES PROJECTS: $6k → 14%LACBA AIDS LEGAL SERVICES PROJECTS: $6k → 14%LACBA AIDS LEGAL SERVICES PROJECTS: $6k → 14%BEING ALIVEPEOPLE WITH AIDS ACTION COALITION INC: $27k → 14%BEING ALIVEPEOPLE WITH AIDS ACTION COALITION INC: $19k → 14%THE THRIVE TRIBE FOUNDATION: $13k → 14%BEING ALIVE: $12k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$707k · 7 repeat orgs$51k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
3

Total granted

$707k
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-11%
+0%

Still filing today

86%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationPhilanthropyEnvironmentCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PA
    PROJECT ANGEL FOOD
    7× · 2019–2025 · $105k · revenue +273%
  • BA
    BEING ALIVE PEOPLE WITH AIDS ACTION COAL
    6× · 2019–2025 · $102k · revenue +183%
  • CF
    Counsel for Justice
    5× · 2019–2023 · $37k · revenue +113%

Funded once

  • HR
    HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +0%
  • TT
    THRIVE TRIBE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $13k · revenue -100%
  • NI
    NAESM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $7k · revenue +26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Aids Project of the East Bay

Aids project of the east bay (apeb) is focused on the prevention of the spread of hiv and supports individuals living with the virus through programs targeted at some of the most vulnerable and marginalized individuals. apeb seeks to…

Health
2
Southern Arizona Aids Foundation

To promote health, well-being, and social justice for those living with HIV, LGBTQ+ individuals, and communities marginalized by society.

Health
3
National Aids Foundation
Health
4
Tag Treatment Action Group Inc

Treatment action group (tag) is an independent, activist, and community-based research and policy think tank committed to racial, gender, and lgbtq+ equity; social justice; and liberation, fighting to end hiv, tuberculosis (tb), and…

Unclassified
5
Hiv Alliance

Supporting individuals living with hiv/aids and preventing new hiv infections.

—
6
Aids Project Los Angeles

Our mission is to achieve health care equity and promote well-being for the lgbt and other underserved communities and people living with and affected by hiv.

—
7
Tpa Network Incorporated

Vision: vivent health envisions an end to the hiv/aids epidemic.mission: to end hiv/aids by providing integratred, personalzied, judgment-free healthcare, social services, and effective prevention strategies.

—
8
Aid for Aids International Inc

Aid for aids international, inc. (afa)is committed to improve the quality of life of people living with hiv/aids (plwhas)in developing countries and who are immigrants to the united states of america. we work to empower plwhas, their…

Civil Rights
9
Legacy Community Health Services Inc

The mission of legacy community health services is, "driving healthy change in our communities." our vision is, "connecting our communities to health every day, in every way."

Health
10
Apla Health & Wellness

Apla health restores dignity and trust within underserved communities by providing world-class lgbtq+ empowering healthcare, hiv specialty care, food, housing and other essential support services.

Health
11
Alianza of New Mexico

Alianza's mission is to empower hard-to-reach, vulnerable, and underserved populations through education and supportive services aimed at working with everyone we serve to achieve better outcomes and higher quality of life.

Human Services
12
Aids Legal Referral Panel of the San Francisco Bay Area

Our mission is to advance and protect the rights, dignity, and health of people living with hiv/aids in the bay area. continued on schedule owe accomplish this through direct legal representation by one of our staff attorneys, by careful…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Francisco Aids Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Thrive Tribe Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/12
Grantees still filing
5/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AIDS UNITED: $346,287 · EducationAIDS UNITEDBEING ALIVE PEOPLE WITH AIDS ACTION COAL: $101,609 · OtherBEING ALIVE PEOPLE WITH AIDS…OUTFEST: $40,000 · OtherOUTFESTCounsel for Justice: $37,055 · OtherCounsel for JusticeSAN FRANCISCO AIDS FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherPROJECT ANGEL FOOD: $104,775 · HealthPROJECT ANGEL FOODTHE LIFE GROUP LA INC: $11,992 · HealthTHE LIFE GROUP LA I…NAESM INC: $7,000 · HealthNAESM INCTHE LOS ANGELES FREE CLINIC: $5,265 · HealthTHE ELIZABETH TAYLOR AIDS FOUNDATION: $65,699 · PhilanthropyTHE ELIZA…HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC: $15,000 · Civil RightsTHRIVE TRIBE FOUNDATION: $13,480 · Environment
Education$346,287Other$188,664Health$129,032Philanthropy$65,699Civil Rights$15,000Environment$13,480

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAIDS UNITED: $346,287 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetPROJECT ANGEL FOOD: $104,775 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetBEING ALIVE PEOPLE WITH AIDS ACTION COAL: $101,609 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetTHE ELIZABETH TAYLOR AIDS FOUNDATION: $65,699 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetOUTFEST: $40,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetCounsel for Justice: $37,055 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHRIVE TRIBE FOUNDATION: $13,480 over 1y, 13% of budgetTHE LIFE GROUP LA INC: $11,992 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO AIDS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAESM INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE LOS ANGELES FREE CLINIC: $5,265 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AIDS Project Los Ange…The Elizabeth Taylor …California Community …The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
AIDS Project Los AngelesCA15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AIDS Project Los Angeles · The Elizabeth Taylor AIDS Foundation · California Community Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Apla Health & Wellness funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Apla Health & Wellness. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Apla Health & Wellness’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home