Skip to content
Apex Foundation Dba Inbylt Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Apex Foundation Dba Inbylt Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$72k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$52k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$186kYouth Development$35kFood & Nutrition$31kHuman Services$18kHousing & Shelter$12kReligion$6kRecreation & Sports$6kCommunity Improvement$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $52k
$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$421k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOLD HOPE INC$52,000
PRESTIGE GLOBAL MEETING SOURCE$14,281
ANOKA COMMUNITY MISSION$3,000
MN VALLEY YOUNG LIFE$1,000
AGAPE INTERNATIONAL MISSIONS$588
NORTHERN EDGE BLUE LINE CLUB$500
WORLD WIDE VILLAGE$500
SHAKOPEE LIONS FOUNDATION$125
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%SHOT FOR HOPE: $1k → 5%CAP AGENCY: $100 → 5%ANNA MARIE'S ALLIANCE: $500 → 11%ALEXANDRA HOUSE: $3k → 7%THE DWELLING PLACE: $3k → 7%CRESCENT COVE: $9k → 11%AVIVO: $500 → 11%ANOKA COMMUNITY MISSION: $8k → 7%ANOKA COMMUNITY MISSION: $4k → 7%ANOKA COMMUNITY MISSION: $3k → 7%ANOKA COMMUNITY MISSION: $3k → 7%ANOKA COMMUNITY MISSION: $3k → 7%ANOKA COMMUNITY MISSION: $3k → 7%ANOKA COMMUNITY MISSION: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$207k · 9 repeat orgs$94k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
34

Total granted

$207k
$79k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-26%
+36%

Still filing today

56%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentInternationalCommunity ImprovementEducationReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BH
    BOLD HOPE INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $87k · revenue +46%
  • WW
    WORLD WIDE VILLAGE INCORPORATED
    7× · 2017–2025 · $50k · revenue -26%
  • AC
    ANOKA COMMUNITY MISSION INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $24k · revenue -65%

Funded once

  • J1
    JUST 1 GLOBAL
    one grant, 2024 · $34k
  • CC
    CRESCENT COVEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $9k · revenue +102%
  • OD
    OPEN DOOR PANTRY
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mercy House Minneapolis
Human Services
2
Care in Action Minnesota

Our mission is to enhance the quality of life of children who have experienced abuse or neglect, strengthen families and prevent childhood maltreatment, by providing timely crucial support that meets the basic needs of local families and…

Human Services
3
West Central Minnesota Youth for Christ

Team evangelism and discipleship

Religion
4
Oasis Central Minnesota Inc

Our mission is to provide safe, temporary shelter for individuals and families experiencing housing insecurities, and connect them to community resources.

Human Services
5
Evolve Adoption & Family Services

To achieve a world where everyone has nurturing, permanent, and supportive familial relationships by providing a full breadth of inclusive, ethical programming in: adoption, foster care, pregnancy support, youth services, cultural support…

Human Services
6
Royal Promise

Answering the physical and spiritual needs of the most vulnerable, through care and advocacy, to make disciples of the gospel of Jesus Christ.

Philanthropy
7
Family Pathways

Family Pathways works alongside people to enhance lives through a continuum of essential services and, together with community, champions positive social change.

Human Services
8
The Family Place

Assisting families in shelters to gain more confidence in building future goals that will lead to success of the entire family.

—
9
Cornerstone Advocacy Service

Cornerstone disrupts violence through advocacy, support, and prevention. We partner with individuals, families, and organizations to build communities free of harm.

Human Services
10
Hope Coalition

Hope coalition provides comprehensive, ongoing support to people impacted by domestic violence, sexual assault, child abuse and economic hardship. through advocacy, education and prevention, we build safety, security and stability in our…

Housing & Shelter
11
Family Promise in Anoka County

Family Promise in Anoka County (FPAC) empowers families experiencing housing insecurity to build a foundation of lasting independence.

Human Services
12
Youthlink

To be a community in which all youth, without regard to their living situation, have an equal opportunity to pursue and achieve their goals and dreams. the agency does this by supporting, resourcing, and empowering young people on their…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Reel Hope Project; the most unlike its peers is Shakopee Lions Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
18/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOLD HOPE INC: $87,250 · InternationalBOLD HOPE INCWORLD WIDE VILLAGE INCORPORATED: $49,920 · InternationalWORLD WIDE VILLAGE INCORPORATEDJUST 1 GLOBAL: $33,900 · OtherJUST 1 GLOBALIGNITE LEADERS INC: $22,292 · OtherIGNITE LEADERS INCPRESTIGE GLOBAL MEETING SOURCE: $14,281 · OtherPRESTIGE GLOBAL MEETING SOURCETREEHOUSE YOUTH OUTREACH: $5,500 · Other+24 more: $29,338 · Other+24 moreANOKA COMMUNITY MISSION INC: $23,636 · Human ServicesANOKA COMMUNITY…CRESCENT COVE: $9,000 · Human ServicesCRESCENT COVEThe Dwelling Place: $3,000 · Human ServicesThe Dwelling Pl…ALEXANDRA HOUSE INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesALEXANDRA HOUSE…+4 more: $2,100 · Human ServicesHOPE 4 Youth: $9,450 · Youth DevelopmentTHE REEL HOPE PROJECT: $500 · Youth DevelopmentOpen Doors For Youth: $500 · Youth DevelopmentSouth Central Minnesota Youth for Christ Inc: $500 · Youth DevelopmentGOOD GROCER: $3,000 · Food & NutritionREACHING UP MINISTRIES: $2,500 · Community ImprovementSHAKOPEE LIONS FOUNDATION: $125 · Community ImprovementLITERACY FOR FREEDOM: $1,000 · EducationFridley Schools Foundation: $500 · Education
International$137,170Other$105,311Human Services$40,236Youth Development$10,950Food & Nutrition$3,000Community Improvement$2,625Education$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOLD HOPE INC: $87,250 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetWORLD WIDE VILLAGE INCORPORATED: $49,920 over 7y, 3.5% of budgetANOKA COMMUNITY MISSION INC: $23,636 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetIGNITE LEADERS INC: $22,292 over 3y, 13% of budgetHOPE 4 Youth: $9,450 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCRESCENT COVE: $9,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetThe Dwelling Place: $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGOOD GROCER: $3,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetREACHING UP MINISTRIES: $2,500 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetALEXANDRA HOUSE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCROSS (CHRISTIANS REACHING OUT IN SOCIAL SERVICES): $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWarriors Ascent: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSHOT FOR HOPE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetLITERACY FOR FREEDOM: $1,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetAVIVO: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE REEL HOPE PROJECT: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOpen Doors For Youth: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOASIS FOR YOUTH: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER AGAINST SEXUAL AND DOMESTIC ABUSE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANNA MARIE'S ALLIANCE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSouth Central Minnesota Youth for Christ Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFridley Schools Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHAKOPEE LIONS FOUNDATION: $125 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSCOTT CARVER DAKOTA CAP AGENCY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOLD HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WIDE VILLAGE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds ANOKA COMMUNITY MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds IGNITE LEADERS INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE 4 Youth ↗
  • Who funds CRESCENT COVE ↗
  • Who funds The Dwelling Place ↗
  • Who funds GOOD GROCER ↗
  • Who funds REACHING UP MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds ALEXANDRA HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds CROSS (CHRISTIANS REACHING OUT IN SOCIAL SERVICES) ↗
  • Who funds Warriors Ascent ↗
  • Who funds SHOT FOR HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds LITERACY FOR FREEDOM ↗
  • Who funds Agape International Missions ↗
  • Who funds AVIVO ↗
  • Who funds THE REEL HOPE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Open Doors For Youth ↗
  • Who funds OASIS FOR YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds CENTER AGAINST SEXUAL AND DOMESTIC ABUSE ↗
  • Who funds KINSHIP OF RICE LAKE INC ↗
  • Who funds ANNA MARIE'S ALLIANCE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Graco FoundationEdina Realty Foundati…Otto Bremer TrustMightycause Charitabl…Thrivent Charitable I…The Minneapolis Found…Bame FoundationThe K FoundationThe Richard M Schulze…Saint Paul & Minnesot…Xcel Energy FoundationCh Robinson Worldwide…
The Graco FoundationMN27.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Graco Foundation · Edina Realty Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · The Minneapolis Foundation · Bame Foundation · The K Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Apex Foundation Dba Inbylt Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Apex Foundation Dba Inbylt Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Apex Foundation Dba Inbylt Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Apex Foundation Dba Inbylt Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Apex Foundation Dba Inbylt’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home