· Private foundation
Apex Foundation Dba Inbylt Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k6 grants · $6k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $52k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BOLD HOPE INC | $52,000 |
| PRESTIGE GLOBAL MEETING SOURCE | $14,281 |
| ANOKA COMMUNITY MISSION | $3,000 |
| MN VALLEY YOUNG LIFE | $1,000 |
| AGAPE INTERNATIONAL MISSIONS | $588 |
| NORTHERN EDGE BLUE LINE CLUB | $500 |
| WORLD WIDE VILLAGE | $500 |
| SHAKOPEE LIONS FOUNDATION | $125 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BHBOLD HOPE INC4× · 2021–2025 · $87k · revenue +46%
- WWWORLD WIDE VILLAGE INCORPORATED7× · 2017–2025 · $50k · revenue -26%
- ACANOKA COMMUNITY MISSION INC7× · 2017–2025 · $24k · revenue -65%
Funded once
- J1JUST 1 GLOBALone grant, 2024 · $34k
- CCCRESCENT COVEgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $9k · revenue +102%
- ODOPEN DOOR PANTRYone grant, 2019 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to enhance the quality of life of children who have experienced abuse or neglect, strengthen families and prevent childhood maltreatment, by providing timely crucial support that meets the basic needs of local families and…
Team evangelism and discipleship
Our mission is to provide safe, temporary shelter for individuals and families experiencing housing insecurities, and connect them to community resources.
To achieve a world where everyone has nurturing, permanent, and supportive familial relationships by providing a full breadth of inclusive, ethical programming in: adoption, foster care, pregnancy support, youth services, cultural support…
Answering the physical and spiritual needs of the most vulnerable, through care and advocacy, to make disciples of the gospel of Jesus Christ.
Family Pathways works alongside people to enhance lives through a continuum of essential services and, together with community, champions positive social change.
Assisting families in shelters to gain more confidence in building future goals that will lead to success of the entire family.
Cornerstone disrupts violence through advocacy, support, and prevention. We partner with individuals, families, and organizations to build communities free of harm.
Hope coalition provides comprehensive, ongoing support to people impacted by domestic violence, sexual assault, child abuse and economic hardship. through advocacy, education and prevention, we build safety, security and stability in our…
Family Promise in Anoka County (FPAC) empowers families experiencing housing insecurity to build a foundation of lasting independence.
To be a community in which all youth, without regard to their living situation, have an equal opportunity to pursue and achieve their goals and dreams. the agency does this by supporting, resourcing, and empowering young people on their…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Reel Hope Project and the most unlike its peers is Shakopee Lions Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 16 years old; the field is 20. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BOLD HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD WIDE VILLAGE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds ANOKA COMMUNITY MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds IGNITE LEADERS INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE 4 Youth ↗
- Who funds CRESCENT COVE ↗
- Who funds GOOD GROCER ↗
- Who funds The Dwelling Place ↗
- Who funds REACHING UP MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds ALEXANDRA HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds LITERACY FOR FREEDOM ↗
- Who funds Warriors Ascent ↗
- Who funds CROSS (CHRISTIANS REACHING OUT IN SOCIAL SERVICES) ↗
- Who funds SHOT FOR HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds Agape International Missions ↗
- Who funds KINSHIP OF RICE LAKE INC ↗
- Who funds South Central Minnesota Youth for Christ Inc ↗
- Who funds THE REEL HOPE PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Open Doors For Youth ↗
- Who funds AVIVO ↗
- Who funds CENTER AGAINST SEXUAL AND DOMESTIC ABUSE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Graco Foundation · Edina Realty Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · The Minneapolis Foundation · Bame Foundation · The K Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Apex Foundation Dba Inbylt Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Apex Foundation Dba Inbylt Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Apex Foundation Dba Inbylt Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.