Skip to content
Anschutz Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Anschutz Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
314
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$3.2MEducation$1.5MHousing & Shelter$1.4MFood & Nutrition$1.3MYouth Development$1.1MCrime & Legal$898kHealth$897kArts & Culture$377kOther$0
02FY2025 · 314 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k210 grants · $1.6M
  • $10k–50k104 grants · $1.1M
$8,500
Median grant
10
States reached
$47M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Escuela de Guadalupe$20,000
CASA of Pueblo$15,000
Community Resource Center Inc$15,000
Mountain Family Center$15,000
Craig Hospital Foundation$15,000
Rocky Mountain PBS$15,000
Manna Soup Kitchen$15,000
Boys & Girls Clubs of Pueblo County$15,000
Brothers Redevelopment Inc$12,500
Catholic Charities of Southern Colorado$12,000
BeyondHome$12,000
Pueblo Cooperative Care Center$12,000
Family & Intercultural Resource Center (FIRC)$12,000
Adams County Food Bank$10,000
Safe Passage$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $3.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LINK Inc: $10k → 14%Wellspring Community: $10k → 3%Community Services of Broomfield Inc: $10k → 5%Teller Senior Coalition: $10k → 8%A Woman's Place Inc: $10k → 9%Grand Valley Catholic Outreach Inc: $30k → 11%Custer County Community Sharing Center Inc: $10k → 11%The Family Center - La Familia: $10k → 11%Holyoke Community Childcare Initiative: $10k → 11%Seniors Resource Center: $10k → 12%Jackson County Council on Aging: $13k → 14%Kit Carson Rural Development: $10k → 14%The Family Resource Center: $10k → 15%Kindred Kids Child Advocacy Center Inc: $11k → 17%Tri-County Family Care Center Inc: $10k → 23%Wellspring Community: $10k → 3%Broomfield FISH: $10k → 5%Teller Senior Coalition: $10k → 8%Northern Colorado Veterans Resource Center: $10k → 9%Mesa County Partners: $10k → 11%Prairie Family Center Inc: $10k → 11%Seniors Resource Center: $10k → 12%Kit Carson Rural Development: $10k → 14%The Family Resource Center: $10k → 15%Loaves and Fishes Ministries of Fremont County: $10k → 17%Tri-County Family Care Center Inc: $10k → 23%Park County Senior Coalition: $10k → 8%Prairie Family Center: $10k → 11%Colorado East Community Action Agency: $10k → 16%Loaves and Fishes Ministries of Fremont County: $10k → 17%Tri-County Family Care Center Inc: $10k → 23%Lift-Up of Routt County: $10k → 6%Family & Intercultural Resource Center (FIRC): $12k → 9%Mesa County Partners: $10k → 11%Prairie Family Center: $10k → 11%Morgan County Family Center: $10k → 12%Colorado East Community Action Agency: $10k → 16%Loaves and Fishes Ministries of Fremont County: $10k → 17%Las Animas Helping Hands: $10k → 27%A Precious Child Inc: $10k → 5%Family & Intercultural Resource Center (FIRC): $10k → 9%Yuma Children's Academy: $10k → 13%Colorado East Community Action Agency: $10k → 16%Pueblo Cooperative Care Center: $12k → 15%Pueblo Cooperative Care Center: $12k → 15%Pueblo Cooperative Care Center: $12k → 15%Pueblo Cooperative Care Center: $12k → 15%Warren Village Inc: $25k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
IN
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
KS
AR
NC
DC
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of Anschutz Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 96% of the giving stays in CO; by stated purpose, 84%.

Anschutz Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.0% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13M · 520 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

520 repeat relationships: 256 still active in FY2025, 264 since wound down; 51 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

520
156

Total granted

$13M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+6%

Still filing today

88%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $413k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    SALISBURY SCHOOL INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $133k · revenue +81%
  • RM
    ROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $115k · revenue +25%
  • LP
    LA PUENTE HOME INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $110k · revenue +331%

Funded once

  • GV
    GRAND VALLEY CATHOLIC OUTREACH INC
    one grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue -10%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +3%
  • MILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue -23%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Food Cluster Inc

Provide opportunities for all to thrive by offering free food resources to communities.

Food & Nutrition
2
Colorado Thrives

Colorado Thrives exists to support Coloradans to achieve economic mobility through access to good jobs.

Community Improvement
3
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
4
Sunshine Home Share Colorado

Sunshine home share colorado ensures quality of life for older adults and strengthens communities through a safe home-sharing model, supportive economic empowerment, and connections to resources and services.

Housing & Shelter
5
Denver Community Ventures

To empower low-income families and individuals towards self-sufficiency and independent living.

Housing & Shelter
6
Urban Outreach Denver

Urban Outreach Denver exists to connect people to God and to a community of support by caring for both short-term and long-term needs in the areas of food, clothing, shlter, medical care, education and job preparation.

Human Services
7
Colorado Casa Inc

Colorado CASA is a nonprofit organization that works to strengthen local CASA organizations and advocate for children in the child welfare system.

Civil Rights
8
Colorado Springs Independence Center

We work with people with disabilities, their families and the community to create independence so that all may thrive.

Human Services
9
Colorado Jobs With Justice Inc

Advance workers rights & social justice through building sustained relationships and taking direct action to create concrete change in the lives of working families

Employment
10
Arc of West Central Colorado

The Arc of West Central Colorado is organized exclusively for charitable, religious, educational and scientific purposes, including, for such purposes, the making of distributions to organizations that qualify as exempt organizations…

Human Services
11
Summitstone Health Partners

SummitStone provides comprehensive behavioral health services across all care levels: 24/7 crisis services, inpatient and outpatient treatment, housing, residential care, and peer support. We partner with law enforcement, schools, and…

Health
12
Focus Reentry

To promote successful second chances, reduce recidivism, and enhance the well-being and safety of our community.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mile High United Way Inc; the most unlike its peers is Jackson County Council On Aging. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

606 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 606 of the 731 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
198
Early backer (in before they grew)
601/606
Grantees still filing
431/606
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

+59 more: $2,024,907 · Human Services+59 moreESCUELA DE GUADALUPE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $165,000 · OtherESCUELA DE GUADALUPE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLLA PUENTE HOME INC: $110,000 · OtherROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $115,000 · Other+76 more: $2,598,892 · Other+76 moreADAMS COUNTY EMERGENCY FOOD BANK: $48,500 · Food & NutritionWELD FOOD BANK: $43,500 · Food & NutritionMOUNTAIN ROOTS FOOD PROJECT: $42,500 · Food & NutritionWEDONTWASTE INC: $40,000 · Food & NutritionSAN LUIS VALLEY LOCAL FOODS COALITION: $40,000 · Food & NutritionColorado Farm to Table Inc: $34,000 · Food & NutritionEARTH MOUNTAIN EDUCATION FARM: $32,220 · Food & NutritionSPROUT CITY FARMS: $32,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC: $32,000 · Food & NutritionCOAL CREEK MEALS ON WHEELS: $31,000 · Food & NutritionCapitol Hill Community Services: $31,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD FOR HOPE: $30,500 · Food & NutritionDENVER FOOD RESCUE: $30,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS OF LOVELAND AND BERTHOUD INC: $30,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD TO POWER (FKA COLORADO SPRINGS FOOD RESCUE): $30,000 · Food & NutritionSALISBURY SCHOOL INC: $133,000 · EducationRIVERSIDE EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $37,500 · EducationPARTNERS IN ROUTT COUNTY: $36,000 · EducationYOUTHENTITY: $36,000 · EducationHBA FOUNDATION DBA HOME BUILDERS FOUNDATION: $35,000 · EducationNorthwest Colorado Center for Independence Inc: $33,000 · EducationBOOK TRAILS INC: $32,000 · EducationEnglish in Action: $32,000 · EducationTINY TIM CENTER INC DBA TLC LEARNING CENTER: $31,000 · EducationHAVERN CENTER INC: $30,000 · EducationEMILY GRIFFITH FOUNDATION: $30,000 · EducationDENVER KIDS INC: $30,000 · EducationCANON LITERACY CENTER INC: $29,500 · EducationPOSADA: $55,000 · Housing & ShelterBROTHERS REDEVELOPMENT INC: $47,500 · Housing & ShelterSAN LUIS VALLEY HOUSING COALITION INC: $42,500 · Housing & ShelterCHAFFEE HOUSING TRUST: $40,000 · Housing & ShelterRising Up: $38,500 · Housing & ShelterHOPE COMMUNITIES INC: $36,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE DELORES PROJECT: $34,500 · Housing & ShelterTHE BRIDGE EMERGENCY SHELTER: $33,500 · Housing & ShelterTHE INN BETWEEN OF LONGMONT INC: $32,500 · Housing & ShelterCOLORADO HOMELESS FAMILIES INC: $32,000 · Housing & ShelterHomeward Pikes Peak: $31,500 · Housing & ShelterARCHWAY HOUSING & SERVICES: $30,000 · Housing & ShelterENERGY RESOURCE CENTER: $30,000 · Housing & ShelterPartners in Housing Inc: $30,000 · Housing & ShelterBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE SAN LUIS VALLEY INC: $90,000 · Youth DevelopmentROCKY MOUNTAIN YOUTH CORPS: $40,285 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LA PLATA COUNTY INC: $38,500 · Youth DevelopmentBoys and Girls Club of South Park: $37,000 · Youth DevelopmentTEENS INC: $33,000 · Youth DevelopmentelevateHER: $31,337 · Youth DevelopmentBLACK CANYON BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC: $31,000 · Youth DevelopmentFOUR CORNERS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $31,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHAFFEE COUNTY: $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF FREMONT COUNTY INC: $28,500 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHWEST COLO: $28,500 · Youth DevelopmentCASA OF PUEBLO INC: $55,000 · Crime & LegalSAN LUIS VALLEY IMMIGRANT RESOURCE: $40,000 · Crime & LegalCHILD AND FAMILY ADVOCACY PROGRAM: $40,000 · Crime & LegalPORCHLIGHT A FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER: $34,000 · Crime & LegalTHE CRAWFORD CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $33,000 · Crime & LegalCHILDSAFE COLORADO INC: $32,000 · Crime & LegalPROJECT SAFEGUARD: $32,000 · Crime & LegalFAMILY VISITOR PROGRAM OF GARFIELD COUNTY INC: $31,000 · Crime & LegalTHE CONFLICT CENTER: $30,000 · Crime & Legal
Human Services$2,024,907Other$2,988,892Food & Nutrition$527,220Education$525,000Housing & Shelter$513,500Youth Development$419,122Crime & Legal$327,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSALISBURY SCHOOL INC: $133,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $115,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLA PUENTE HOME INC: $110,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE SAN LUIS VALLEY INC: $90,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetCASA OF PUEBLO INC: $55,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetPOSADA: $55,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetPARARESCUE FOUNDATION: $53,500 over 5y, 5.4% of budgetNORTHWEST COLORADO VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION: $50,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Pueblo County: $49,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetADAMS COUNTY EMERGENCY FOOD BANK: $48,500 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetPueblo Cooperative Care Center: $48,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetBROTHERS REDEVELOPMENT INC: $47,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWARREN VILLAGE INC: $45,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMANNA - THE DURANGO SOUP KITCHEN: $45,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetWELD FOOD BANK: $43,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAN LUIS VALLEY HOUSING COALITION INC: $42,500 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetMOUNTAIN ROOTS FOOD PROJECT: $42,500 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetHOMEWARD ALLIANCE INC: $42,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN YOUTH CORPS: $40,285 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCHAFFEE HOUSING TRUST: $40,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetCHILD ADVOCATES - DENVER CASA: $40,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetSAN LUIS VALLEY IMMIGRANT RESOURCE: $40,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetCHILD AND FAMILY ADVOCACY PROGRAM: $40,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetSparkHope Automotive: $40,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetFULL CIRCLE OF LAKE COUNTY INC: $40,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetFOCUS POINTS FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $40,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCommunity Coalition for Families and Children: $40,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetSAFEHOUSE DENVER INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetAlternative Horizons Corporation: $40,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetMariposa Center for Safety: $40,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetWEDONTWASTE INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCROSSROADS SAFEHOUSE INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTEACHING TREE EARLY CHILDHOOD LEARNING CENTER: $40,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetDENVER URBAN GARDENS: $40,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetDenver Inner City Parish Inc: $40,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSAN LUIS VALLEY LOCAL FOODS COALITION: $40,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $39,750 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetRising Up: $38,500 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetA Sanctuary for Military Families Inc DBA Project Sanctuary: $38,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetSUN VALLEY YOUTH CENTER INC: $38,500 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetA WOMAN'S PLACE INCORPORATED: $38,500 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LA PLATA COUNTY INC: $38,500 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetALIGHT ALLIANCE TO LEAD IMPACT IN GLOBAL: $38,500 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetSIX POINTS EVALUATION AND TRAINING INC: $37,500 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetTeller Senior Coalition Inc: $37,500 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetRIVERSIDE EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $37,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetDELTA MONTROSE YOUTH SERVICES INC: $37,500 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetSt Anne's Episcopal School Inc: $37,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Av Hunter Trust Incor…El Pomar FoundationThe Colorado Health F…Colorado Gives Founda…Trailhead InstituteCaring for Colorado F…The Colorado TrustRocky Mountain Health…Temple Hoyne Buell Fo…The Edmund T & Eleano…Gates Family Foundati…Nextfifty Initiative
Av Hunter Trust IncorporatedCO234.7× affinity132 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Av Hunter Trust Incorporated · El Pomar Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Trailhead Institute · Caring for Colorado Foundation · The Colorado Trust · Rocky Mountain Health Foundation · Temple Hoyne Buell Foundation · The Edmund T & Eleanor Quick Foundation · Gates Family Foundation · Nextfifty Initiative

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Anschutz Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Anschutz Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    145report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Anschutz Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Anschutz Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 731 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Anschutz Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home