· Private foundation
Anne C & Joseph a Slicker Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k16 grants · $58k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $82k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CATTLE BARON'S BALL | $15,500 |
| WIPE OUT KIDS CANCER | $13,500 |
| ST MICHAEL ALL ANGELS EPISCOPAL | $13,000 |
| PARKINSON'S RECOVERY PROJECT | $10,000 |
| TIBETAN CENTER COMPASSION & WISDOM | $10,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $10,000 |
| THE AWARE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| NEVERTHIRST | $5,000 |
| ANANDA LOS ANGELES | $5,000 |
| OPERATION KINDNESS | $5,000 |
| WHISPERING WILLOWS SENIOR DOG | $5,000 |
| NINE GATES PROGRAM | $5,000 |
| SELF ENQUIRY LIFE FELLOWSHIP | $5,000 |
| CENTER FOR ECOZOIC STUDIES | $5,000 |
| ALLEY CAT RESCUE | $5,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.
35 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- SESlicker Enterprise Foundation2× · 2020–2021 · $2.0M · revenue +405% · 100% of their budget
- TETHE EPISCOPAL SCHOOL OF DALLAS INC8× · 2017–2025 · $100k · revenue +20%
- WOWIPE OUT KIDS' CANCER INC6× · 2019–2025 · $76k · revenue +378%
Funded once
- EFEDUCATIONAL FIRST STEPSone grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue -46%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN ROGEL CANCERone grant, 2023 · $10k
- TCTIBETAN CENTER FOR COMPASSION AND WISDOMgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +65% · 26% of their budget
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.
The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…
The mission of take paws rescue is to meet the moral obligation to protect and save the lives of pets in need of rescue in louisiana. take paws rescue enacts this mission by pulling pets from rural and high kill shelters and preparing them…
Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)
A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.
Pet animal welfare society of ct (paws), established in 1962, is a no-kill animal rescue shelter dedicated to the rescue and adoption of our community's homeless and abused dogs and cats. paws efforts are focused on three critical needs:…
World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…
One tail at a time west texas otat wtx serves the rural communities of west texas by supporting animal shelter operations rescuing and sheltering homeless unwanted companion animals dogs and cats primarily arranging their veterinary care…
The pollination project foundation (tpp) provides catalytic seed funding to expert volunteers driving grassroots, community-led change around the world. grounded in heartivism - the practice of pairing compassion with action - tpp funds…
The organization is a no-kill animal rescue. paws saves lives and prevents suffering by implementing the no-kill philosophy through aggressive spay/neuter programs for owned and unowned animals. this is accomplished by rescuing, fostering,…
HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…
How this is measured
44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Slicker Enterprise Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds THE EPISCOPAL SCHOOL OF DALLAS INC ↗
- Who funds WIPE OUT KIDS' CANCER INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD ↗
- Who funds SELF ENQUIRY LIFE FELLOWSHIP ↗
- Who funds PRESTON HOLLOW PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH FDN ↗
- Who funds ROOM TO READ ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds APPLE FARM COMMUNITY INC ↗
- Who funds SYNCHRONICITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds EDUCATIONAL FIRST STEPS ↗
- Who funds UT SOUTHWESTERN HEALTH SYSTEMS ↗
- Who funds Malibu Gives ↗
- Who funds THE GIVE TO GIVE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEVERTHIRST INC ↗
- Who funds TIBETAN CENTER FOR COMPASSION AND WISDOM ↗
- Who funds CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PARKINSON VOICE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds OPERATION KINDNESS ↗
- Who funds Mosaic Multicultural Foundation ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · The Dallas Foundation · Horace C Cabe Foundation · The Perot Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Edward Jones Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Anne C & Joseph a Slicker Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Anne C & Joseph a Slicker Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- Newburyport Art Association Inc: 1% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Anne C & Joseph a Slicker Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Anne C & Joseph a Slicker Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Anne C & Joseph a Slicker’s filings →