Skip to content
Anna May Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Anna May Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$120k
Granted FY2025still arriving
32
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$164kHealth$67kPublic Safety & Disaster$63kYouth Development$53kPhilanthropy$51kEducation$48kArts & Culture$40kAnimals$37kOther$0
02FY2025 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k30 grants · $100k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEDFORD SCHOOL DISTRICT 549C$10,000
UNITED WAY OF JACKSON COUNTY$10,000
JACKSON COUNTY SEXUAL ASSAULT RESPONSE TEAM$6,000
COMMUNITY WORKS INC$6,000
SMART READING$5,000
ROGUE COMMUNITY HEALTH$5,000
ROGUE VALLEY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENT$5,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY$5,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB$4,000
CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING$4,000
ROGUE VALLEY FAMILY YMCA$4,000
COLLEGE DREAMS INC DBA PROJECT YOUTH$4,000
COMPASS HOUSE INC$4,000
ONTRACK INC$3,500
GIRLS BUILD$3,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $88k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JACKSONVILLE COMMUNITY CENTER: $2k → 13%OASIS CENTER OF THE ROGUE VALLEY: $5k → 13%OASIS CENTER OF THE ROGUE VALLEY: $3k → 13%OASIS CENTER OF THE ROGUE VALLEY: $2k → 13%COMPASS HOUSE INC: $8k → 13%COMPASS HOUSE INC: $8k → 13%COMPASS HOUSE INC: $6k → 13%ROGUE VALLEY FAMILY YMCA: $5k → 13%HEARTS WITH A MISSION: $5k → 13%COMPASS HOUSE INC: $4k → 13%ROGUE VALLEY FAMILY YMCA: $4k → 13%COMPASS HOUSE INC: $4k → 13%COMMUNITY VOLUNTEER NETWORK: $4k → 13%COMMUNITY VOLUNTEER NETWORK: $4k → 13%COMMUNITY VOLUNTEER NETWORK: $4k → 13%COMPASS HOUSE INC: $4k → 13%COMMUNITY VOLUNTEER NETWORK: $4k → 13%COMMUNITY VOLUNTEER NETWORK: $3k → 13%COMMUNITY VOLUNTEER NETWORK: $3k → 13%HEARTS WITH A MISSION: $3k → 13%ARC OF JACKSON COUNTY: $3k → 13%ROGUE VALLEY FAMILY YMCA: $3k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$704k · 49 repeat orgs$64k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

49 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

49
19

Total granted

$704k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+9%

Still filing today

59%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthYouth DevelopmentEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF JACKSON COUNTY INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $57k · revenue +36%
  • CH
    COMPASS HOUSE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $34k · revenue +3%
  • CV
    COMMUNITY VOLUNTEER NETWORK
    6× · 2020–2025 · $20k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • UR
    UNITED ROTARY CLUBS OF SOUTHERN OREGON
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -43%
  • MA
    MT ASHLAND ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue -21%
  • KU
    KIDS UNLIMITED OREGON
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Young Roots Oregon

The mission of young roots oregon is to creatively help young families build healthy foundations. our multi-generational vision is to give pregnant and parenting adolescents through age 24 and their children equitable opportunities for…

—
2
Ashland Works

Local Innovation Works supports recovery and resilience in Southern Oregon by supporting and training emerging leaders in values-aligned community organizations. It also hosts public conversations on topics related to the long term…

Community Improvement
3
Oregon Justice Network

Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…

Human Services
4
Rogue Action Center

Our mission is to grow organizing power and leaders for a more just and thriving Southern Oregon.

Community Improvement
5
Rimrock Trails Treatment Services

To improve the lives of those struggling with mental health and/or substance use by providing timely access to compassionate and effective behavioral healthcare.

Health
6
The Arc Oregon

The arc of oregon, together with its network of members and affiliated chapters, advocates for the rights and full community participation of all children and adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

—
7
Priority Oregon

To support public policies that will help oregon's economy and create new family supporting jobs in oregon.

—
8
Trillium Family Services

Building brighter futures with children and families.

Housing & Shelter
9
Eastern Oregon Health and Wellness Inc

Eastern oregon health & wellness provides recovery housing and outpatient services that support individuals and families impacted by substance use disorder through safe housing, trauma-informed care, and community-based support.

Health
10
Southern Oregon Aspire

Our mission is to inspire unlimited opportunities for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities to live the life they choose by providing person-centered supports tailored to the unique needs of each individual.

Employment
11
Morrison Child and Family Services

Helping kids be kids, and supporting families when they need us most. morrison serves over 8,000 youth and families annually through ten distinct programs designed to meet the needs of our clients.

Health
12
Our Children Oregon

Our children oregon's mission is to be a voice and force for the common good for all oregon children, ensuring all children have the resources and opportunities they need to reach their full potential. we elevate data and the voices of…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Works Inc; the most unlike its peers is Jacksonville Community Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
45/46
Grantees still filing
29/46
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MEDFORD SCHOOL DISTRICT 549C: $60,000 · OtherMEDFORD SCHOOL DISTRICT 549CJACKSON COUNTY SEXUAL ASSAULT RESPONSE TEAM: $36,000 · OtherJACKSON COUNTY SEXUAL ASSAULT RESPONSE TEAMST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY: $30,000 · OtherST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETYROGUE VALLEY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENT: $29,500 · OtherROGUE VALLEY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTCONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING: $26,000 · OtherCONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELINGIndividual grant recipient: $25,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $21,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $21,000 · Other+32 more: $221,267 · Other+32 moreCOMPASS HOUSE INC: $33,500 · Human ServicesCOMPASS HOUSE …COMMUNITY VOLUNTEER NETWORK: $20,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY VOLU…YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC MEDFORD dba RV FAMILY YMCA: $11,500 · Human ServicesYOUNG MENS CHR…OASIS CENTER OF THE ROGUE VALLEY: $10,000 · Human ServicesOASIS CENTER O…HEARTS WITH A MISSION: $8,000 · Human ServicesHEARTS WITH A …KINDRED MATTERS: $5,500 · Human ServicesKINDRED MATTER…+3 more: $6,500 · Human Services+3 moreUNITED WAY OF JACKSON COUNTY INC: $57,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WA…JOSEPHINE COUNTY FOUNDATION: $4,000 · PhilanthropyJOSEPHINE…ROGUE COMMUNITY HEALTH: $15,000 · HealthALS Northwest: $12,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY WORKS INC: $10,000 · HealthROGUE RETREAT: $3,000 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OREGON: $1,500 · HealthNEUROTHERAPEUTIC PEDIATRIC THERAPIES INC: $1,500 · HealthROGUE VALLEY MENTORING: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentUNITED ROTARY CLUBS OF SOUTHERN OREGON: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentKIDS UNLIMITED OF OREGON: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentMT ASHLAND ASSOCIATION: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS BUILD: $3,500 · Youth DevelopmentSCIENCEWORKS HANDS-ON MUSEUM: $6,000 · Arts & CultureTALENT MAKER CITY: $6,000 · Arts & CultureOregon Conservatory of Perfoming Arts: $5,000 · Arts & CultureOREGON CENTER FOR CREATIVE LEARNING DBA KID TIME: $4,500 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL INVENTORS HALL OF FAME INC: $4,000 · Arts & CultureROGUE VALLEY SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $3,000 · Arts & CultureSOUTHERN OREGON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $2,500 · Arts & CultureMusic Workshop: $2,500 · Arts & CultureTHE FAMILY NURTURING CENTER ROGUE VALLEY CHILDREN'S RELIEF NURSERY: $19,000 · EducationRiding Beyond: $7,000 · EducationSMART READING: $5,000 · Education
Other$471,017Human Services$95,000Philanthropy$61,000Health$43,000Youth Development$33,500Arts & Culture$33,500Education$31,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF JACKSON COUNTY INC: $57,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetCOMPASS HOUSE INC: $33,500 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY VOLUNTEER NETWORK: $20,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetTHE FAMILY NURTURING CENTER ROGUE VALLEY CHILDREN'S RELIEF NURSERY: $19,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetROGUE COMMUNITY HEALTH: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetROGUE VALLEY MENTORING: $15,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSANCTUARY ONE: $14,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetCASA OF JACKSON COUNTY INC: $13,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetACCESS: $13,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALS Northwest: $12,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC MEDFORD dba RV FAMILY YMCA: $11,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY WORKS INC: $10,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOASIS CENTER OF THE ROGUE VALLEY: $10,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetReclaiming Lives: $8,616 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetHEARTS WITH A MISSION: $8,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetONTRACK INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe CREST: $7,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetOPPORTUNITIES FOR HOUSING RESOURCES AND: $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRiding Beyond: $7,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetROOTS AND WINGS CHILD DEVELOPMENT: $7,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetSCIENCEWORKS HANDS-ON MUSEUM: $6,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTALENT MAKER CITY: $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetKINDRED MATTERS: $5,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetUNITED ROTARY CLUBS OF SOUTHERN OREGON: $5,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetSMART READING: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOregon Conservatory of Perfoming Arts: $5,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetKIDS UNLIMITED OF OREGON: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMT ASHLAND ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOREGON CENTER FOR CREATIVE LEARNING DBA KID TIME: $4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetASHLAND EMERGENCY FOOD BANK: $4,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetJOSEPHINE COUNTY FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL INVENTORS HALL OF FAME INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROGUE WORLD MUSIC: $3,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetROGUE VALLEY SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHIV ALLIANCE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROGUE RETREAT: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ARC JACKSON COUNTY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTHERN OREGON HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMusic Workshop: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJACKSONVILLE COMMUNITY CENTER: $2,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetFREEDOM FARMS: $2,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetPROJECT LEMONADE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUSTA-PACIFIC NORTHWEST SECTION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OREGON: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEUROTHERAPEUTIC PEDIATRIC THERAPIES INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF JACKSON COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds COMPASS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY VOLUNTEER NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds THE FAMILY NURTURING CENTER ROGUE VALLEY CHILDREN'S RELIEF NURSERY ↗
  • Who funds ROGUE COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds ROGUE VALLEY MENTORING ↗
  • Who funds SANCTUARY ONE ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF JACKSON COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS ↗
  • Who funds ALS Northwest ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC MEDFORD dba RV FAMILY YMCA ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY WORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds OASIS CENTER OF THE ROGUE VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds Reclaiming Lives ↗
  • Who funds HEARTS WITH A MISSION ↗
  • Who funds ONTRACK INC ↗
  • Who funds The CREST ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITIES FOR HOUSING RESOURCES AND ↗
  • Who funds Riding Beyond ↗
  • Who funds ROOTS AND WINGS CHILD DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds SCIENCEWORKS HANDS-ON MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds TALENT MAKER CITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Carpenter Foundat…Carrico Family Founda…The Oregon Community …The Roundhouse Founda…The Ford Family Found…United Way of Jackson…The Collins FoundationJoe & Frances Naumes …The Autzen FoundationMarie Lamfrom Charita…Careoregon IncRobert and Frances Ch…
The Carpenter FoundationOR61.4× affinity27 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Carpenter Foundation · Carrico Family Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · The Roundhouse Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · United Way of Jackson County Inc · The Collins Foundation · Joe & Frances Naumes Family Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Careoregon Inc · Robert and Frances Chaney Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Anna May Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Anna May Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 15%
  • Kindred Matters: 100% of income from government
  • The Arc Jackson County: 87% of income from government
  • Access: 65% of income from government
  • Community Volunteer Network: 59% of income from government
  • Community Works Inc: 59% of income from government
  • Hiv Alliance: 54% of income from government
  • Hearts With a Mission: 51% of income from government
  • Reclaiming Lives: 47% of income from government
  • Rogue Valley Mentoring: 42% of income from government
  • Oregon Center for Creative Learning Dba Kid Time: 42% of income from government
  • The Family Nurturing Center Rogue Valley Children's Relief Nursery: 38% of income from government
  • Project Lemonade Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Rogue Community Health: 13% of income from government
  • Rogue Retreat: 12% of income from government
  • United Way of Jackson County Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Music Workshop: 10% of income from government
  • Compass House Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Ontrack Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Neurotherapeutic Pediatric Therapies Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Young Mens Christian Assoc Medford dba Rv Family Ymca: 1% of income from government
  • Rogue Valley Symphony Association: 1% of income from government
  • Scienceworks Hands-On Museum: 0% of income from government
  • Casa of Jackson County Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
7rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Anna May Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Anna May Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Anna May Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home