· Private foundation
Anita B and Howard S Richmond Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 65% of ANITA B AND HOWARD S RICHMOND FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k65 grants · $132k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $267k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $225k
- $250k+1 grant · $500k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FIREAID | $500,000 |
| LOOMIS CHAFEE SCHOOL ANNUAL FUND | $175,000 |
| MA CENTER | $50,000 |
| CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF THE ARTS | $45,000 |
| CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY MUSEUM | $30,000 |
| MENLO SCHOOL | $25,000 |
| SMU WOMEN'S GOLF EXCELLENCE FUND | $25,000 |
| HUDSON RIVER SLOOP CLEARWATER | $25,000 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS | $25,000 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN | $25,000 |
| WILLISTON NORTHAMPTON SCHOOL | $15,000 |
| JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM SPRINGS & DESERT AREA | $15,000 |
| SAN MIGUEL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| CENTRO INFANTIL DE LOS ANGELES | $12,000 |
| BAYLOR WOMEN'S GOLF EXCELLENCE FUND | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against -2% for the ones you funded once.
92 repeat relationships — 71 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $555k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CICALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF THE ARTS6× · 2017–2025 · $195k · revenue +30%
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC4× · 2020–2025 · $155k · revenue +39%
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC3× · 2023–2025 · $150k · revenue +36%
Funded once
- SBSANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTEone grant, 2023 · $300k · revenue -2%
- KFKAUAI FOOD BANK INCone grant, 2020 · $27k · revenue -38%
- URUN REFUGEE AGENCY USA FOR UNHCRone grant, 2024 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To further the conservation, improvement and restoration of human eyesight" (mrs. doheny - 1947).
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.
Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.
Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)
The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…
The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…
Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…
The climate institute is organized for the purpose of educating the general public and policy makers as to the gravity of potential climate change, exploring the policy implications of the latest scientific findings on climate modelling…
Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.
Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…
Increase societal understanding of the earth system through scientific research and education.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arthritis Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Ed Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 51 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 20% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
63 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 63 of the 120 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM SPRINGS AND DESERT AREA ↗
- Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
- Who funds MENLO SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID ↗
- Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
- Who funds BIGHORN INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds THE WILLISTON NORTHAMPTON SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Angel View Inc ↗
- Who funds KAUAI FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY YMCA OF THE DESERT ↗
- Who funds HUDSON RIVER SLOOP CLEARWATER INC ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF FOOD BANKS ↗
- Who funds Eisenhower Medical Center ↗
- Who funds SPECTRUM DESIGNS FOUNDATION LTD ↗
- Who funds Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds NICHOLAS CENTER LTD ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Wilcox Health Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE ED FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF AMERICAN SONG ARCHIVES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Bighorn Golf Club Charities Inc · Inland Empire Community Foundation · The Champions Volunteer Foundation · HN and Frances C Berger Foundation · The Grace Helen Spearman Foundation · Houston Family Foundation · The Coeta and Donald Barker Foundation · Anderson Childrens Foundation · Peter & Jeri Dejana Foundation · Coachella Valley Wellness Foundation · The Galen Family Foundation · The Auen Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Anita B and Howard S Richmond Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Epilepsy Foundation of America — 22% of income from government
- Landmark College Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Anita B and Howard S Richmond Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Anita B and Howard S Richmond Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.