Skip to content

· Private foundation

Anita B and Howard S Richmond Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
80
Grants FY2025still arriving
15
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$903kPublic Safety & Disaster$769kHealth$567kHuman Services$536kArts & Culture$468kInternational$404kRecreation & Sports$150kPhilanthropy$107kOther$0
02FY2025 · 80 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k65 grants · $132k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $267k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $225k
  • $250k+1 grant · $500k
$1,500
Median grant
15
States reached
$8.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIREAID$500,000
LOOMIS CHAFEE SCHOOL ANNUAL FUND$175,000
MA CENTER$50,000
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF THE ARTS$45,000
CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY MUSEUM$30,000
MENLO SCHOOL$25,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$25,000
HUDSON RIVER SLOOP CLEARWATER$25,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$25,000
SMU WOMEN'S GOLF EXCELLENCE FUND$25,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM SPRINGS & DESERT AREA$15,000
SAN MIGUEL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$15,000
WILLISTON NORTHAMPTON SCHOOL$15,000
CENTRO INFANTIL DE LOS ANGELES$12,000
BAYLOR WOMEN'S GOLF EXCELLENCE FUND$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ANGEL VIEW CRIPPLED CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $7k → 11%ANGEL VIEW CRIPPLED CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%ANGEL VIEW CRIPPLED CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%ANGEL VIEW CRIPPLED CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $4k → 11%BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC: $2k → 14%ANGEL VIEW CRIPPLED CHILDREN'S FOUN: $4k → 11%BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC: $2k → 14%ANGEL VIEW CRIPPLED CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $4k → 11%ANGEL VIEW CRIPPLED CHILDREN'S FOUN: $4k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
MD
AZ
TN
DC
HI
OK
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.1M · 92 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against -2% for those funded once.

92 repeat relationships: 71 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

92
19

Total granted

$3.1M
$455k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
-2%

Still filing today

50%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $555k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalAnimalsEducationEnvironmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF THE ARTS
    6× · 2017–2025 · $195k · revenue +30%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $155k · revenue +39%
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $150k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • SB
    SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2023 · $300k · revenue -2%
  • KF
    KAUAI FOOD BANK INC
    one grant, 2020 · $27k · revenue -38%
  • CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF FOOD BANKS
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Doheny Eye Institute

To further the conservation, improvement and restoration of human eyesight" (mrs. doheny - 1947).

—
2
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
3
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
4
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
5
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
6
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
7
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
8
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
9
Climate Institute

The climate institute is organized for the purpose of educating the general public and policy makers as to the gravity of potential climate change, exploring the policy implications of the latest scientific findings on climate modelling…

Environment
10
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
11
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
12
Earth & Space Research

Increase societal understanding of the earth system through scientific research and education.

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arthritis Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Ed Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

63 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 63 of the 120 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
60/63
Grantees still filing
44/63
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRE AID: $500,000 · OtherFIRE AIDMATA AMRITANANDAMAYI CENTER: $450,000 · OtherMATA AMRITANANDAMAYI CENTERLOOMIS CHAFEE SCHOOL ANNUAL FUND: $445,000 · OtherLOOMIS CHAFEE SCHOOL ANNUAL FUNDTHE LOOMIS CHAFEE SCHOOL: $250,000 · OtherTHE LOOMIS CHAFEE SCHOOLCHILDREN'S DISCOVERY MUSEUM: $210,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S DISCOVERY MUSEUMAMERICAN RED CROSS: $119,000 · Other+76 more: $896,550 · Other+76 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $155,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS …WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $150,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL …DIRECT RELIEF: $85,000 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEFAMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID: $60,000 · InternationalAMERICAN NEAR …The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $55,000 · InternationalThe American J…+4 more: $32,000 · International+4 moreSANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE: $300,000 · HealthSANFORD BU…Eisenhower Medical Center: $23,000 · HealthEisenhower…AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $14,000 · Health+9 more: $72,000 · Health+9 moreCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF THE ARTS: $195,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF AMERICAN SONG ARCHIVES INC: $12,500 · Arts & CultureINTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $10,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureBIGHORN INSTITUTE: $45,000 · AnimalsCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC: $9,000 · AnimalsWildlife Conservation Society: $9,000 · AnimalsAnimal Samaritans: $6,500 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $4,500 · AnimalsTHE WILLISTON NORTHAMPTON SCHOOL: $35,000 · EducationUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $9,000 · EducationCollege of the Desert Foundation: $9,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF THE PALM SPRINGS LIBRARY: $8,000 · EducationOPERATION RESPECT INC: $4,500 · EducationAngel View Inc: $31,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY YMCA OF THE DESERT: $25,000 · Human ServicesBRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC: $3,000 · Human Services
Other$2,870,550International$537,000Health$409,000Arts & Culture$218,500Animals$74,000Education$65,500Human Services$59,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE: $300,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF THE ARTS: $195,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $155,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $150,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM SPRINGS AND DESERT AREA: $90,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $85,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMENLO SCHOOL: $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $55,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIGHORN INSTITUTE: $45,000 over 7y, 3.7% of budgetTHE WILLISTON NORTHAMPTON SCHOOL: $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAngel View Inc: $31,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetKAUAI FOOD BANK INC: $27,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF FOOD BANKS: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY YMCA OF THE DESERT: $25,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetEisenhower Medical Center: $23,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSPECTRUM DESIGNS FOUNDATION LTD: $21,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetLegal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNICHOLAS CENTER LTD: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $14,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWilcox Health Foundation: $13,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ED FOUNDATION: $13,000 over 6y, 15% of budgetFRIENDS OF AMERICAN SONG ARCHIVES INC: $12,500 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetLIVING DESERT THE: $10,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetINTERLOCHEN CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC: $9,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDESERT CANCER FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetDAP Health Inc: $9,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $9,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGREENPEACE INC: $9,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society: $9,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $9,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $9,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSHELTER FROM THE STORM INC: $9,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $9,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $9,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $9,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEASTER SEALS INC: $9,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $9,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $9,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCollege of the Desert Foundation: $9,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $9,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE PALM SPRINGS LIBRARY: $8,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIONAL CENTER FOR MISSING AND EXPLOITED CHILDREN: $7,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLANDMARK COLLEGE INC: $6,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAnimal Samaritans: $6,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM SPRINGS AND DESERT AREA ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds MENLO SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID ↗
  • Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
  • Who funds BIGHORN INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE WILLISTON NORTHAMPTON SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Angel View Inc ↗
  • Who funds KAUAI FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF FOOD BANKS ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY YMCA OF THE DESERT ↗
  • Who funds HUDSON RIVER SLOOP CLEARWATER INC ↗
  • Who funds Eisenhower Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds SPECTRUM DESIGNS FOUNDATION LTD ↗
  • Who funds Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds NICHOLAS CENTER LTD ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Wilcox Health Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE ED FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF AMERICAN SONG ARCHIVES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bighorn Golf Club Charities IncCA24× affinity9 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bighorn Golf Club Charities Inc · Inland Empire Community Foundation · The Champions Volunteer Foundation · HN and Frances C Berger Foundation · The Grace Helen Spearman Foundation · Houston Family Foundation · The Coeta and Donald Barker Foundation · Anderson Childrens Foundation · Peter & Jeri Dejana Foundation · Coachella Valley Wellness Foundation · The Galen Family Foundation · The Auen Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Anita B and Howard S Richmond Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Anita B and Howard S Richmond Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Epilepsy Foundation of America: 22% of income from government
  • Landmark College Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Anita B and Howard S Richmond Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Anita B and Howard S Richmond Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 120 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Anita B and Howard S Richmond’s filings →

More from the funding graph