Skip to content
Anima Christi Retreats Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Anima Christi Retreats Inc

Anima christis mission is, as christ has commanded, to "go and make disciples" (mt.

$18k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Human Services$148kInternational$108kReligion$95kFood & Nutrition$3k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $6,650, the rows itemized in this filing. The $18,300 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $11,650 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$6,650
Median grant
1
States reached
$112k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WORLD VILLAGES FOR CHILDREN$6,650
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–20, $68k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%CATHOLIC CHARITIES FAMILY CENTER: $67k → 8%CENTRO TEPEYAC INC: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Holy Family Services Adoption and Foster Care

Holy family services adoption and foster care, ("the agency"), is a california non-profit public benefit corporation organized to provide adoption and counseling services in los angeles county, orange county, ventura county, and riverside…

Human Services
2
Little Sisters of the Poor Chicago St Mary's Home

The little sisters of the poor operate st. mary's home, which provides nursing and residential care for the needy elderly. the home is part of the international congregation of the little sisters of the poor, which was founded in france in…

—
3
Catholic Charities of Northwest Florida

Catholic charities carries out the social mission of the catholic church in northwest florida to serve, empower, and advocate for vulnerable families and individuals of any race, religion, or national origin.

—
4
Childrens House International

Children's house international provides ethical adoption services, child focused recruitment, and family support. we support disadvantaged children with humanitarian aid in countries worldwide.

—
5
Light From Light Inc

Light from light partners with local leaders to provide healthcare and nutrition for the most vulnerable communities in haiti. our vision is that no child ever dies from malnutrition. our three program focus areas are: 1) nutrition…

International
6
Help the Helpless

Help the helpless is dedicated to improving the lives of abandoned, handicapped, deaf, and poor children in the countries of india and ecuador. we also help poor families and the elderly who are in need. the non-profit is chaired by father…

International
7
Catholic Charities Counseling & Adoption Services of the Diocese of Erie Inc

Provide adoption, counseling services, and refugee assistance

—
8
Leah's Kids Inc

To help orphans, widows and the less fortunate in guatemala and beyond by providing housing, clothes, food, and education.

Human Services
9
Home for the Aged of Little Sisters of the Poor

Exclusively charitable, religious and benevolent. The Home is a part of the international Congregation of the Little Sisters of the Poor, which was founded in France in 1839 and serves the elderly in 32 countries.

Religion
10
Misioneros Del Camino Inc

Care for orphaned, abandoned, malnourished and developmentally disabled children in guatemala, c.a.

International
11
Little Sisters of the Poor Palatine St Josephs Home for the Elderly

The little sisters of the poor operate st. joseph's home, which provides nursing and residential care for the needy elderly. the home is part of the international congregation of the little sisters of the poor, which was founded in france…

Human Services
12
Child Hope International

We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ- centered care, training and social work.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sister of Mary Boystown and Girlstown Inc; the most unlike its peers is Centro Tepeyac Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SISTER OF MARY BOYSTOWN AND GIRLSTOWN INC: $96,379 · InternationalSISTER OF MARY BOYSTOWN AND GIRLSTOWN INCMUSTARD SEED COMMUNITIES INC: $64,640 · InternationalMUSTARD SEED COMMUNITIES INCTHE ST LUKE FOUNDATION FOR HAITI: $7,000 · International+1 more: $4,600 · InternationalOUR LADY OF SORROWS CHURCH: $67,000 · OtherOUR LADY OF SORROWS CHURCHST ANDREW APOSTLE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $27,000 · OtherST ANDREW APOSTLE CATHOLIC CHURCHADOPTIONS FROM THE HEART INC: $9,050 · OtherADOPTIONS FROM THE HEART INC+1 more: $1,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON: $66,800 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF…+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesLife-Giving Wounds Corporation: $10,000 · Health
International$172,619Other$104,050Human Services$67,800Health$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSISTER OF MARY BOYSTOWN AND GIRLSTOWN INC: $96,379 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF WASHINGTON: $66,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMUSTARD SEED COMMUNITIES INC: $64,640 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetLife-Giving Wounds Corporation: $10,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetADOPTIONS FROM THE HEART INC: $9,050 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ST LUKE FOUNDATION FOR HAITI: $7,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHINA LITTLE FLOWER INC: $4,600 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCENTRO TEPEYAC INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tom & Glory Sullivan …The Blackbaud Giving …Natl Christian Charit…Vanguard Charitable E…Paypal Charitable Giv…Network for GoodDonor Advised Charita…National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Tom & Glory Sullivan FoundationFL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tom & Glory Sullivan Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Anima Christi Retreats Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Anima Christi Retreats Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Anima Christi Retreats Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Anima Christi Retreats Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Anima Christi Retreats’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home