Loading…
· Public charity
ANIMA CHRISTI RETREATS INC
Anima christis mission is, as christ has commanded, to "go and make disciples" (mt.
$25k
Granted FY2023
2
Grants
2
Communities
$9k
Largest
01What you fund
0170% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2023.
International$159kHuman Services$68kHealth$10kOther$104k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2020
volunteersmscmustard seed
2022
adults
2023
adoption
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2023 · 2 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$9,050
Median grant
2
States reached
$58k
Total assets
Largest grants
- ADOPTIONS FROM THE HEART$9,050
- WORLD VILLAGES FOR CHILDREN$7,250
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY18–20, $68k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8% — the area typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Catholic Charities Hawaii
Helping people in need to help themselves, regardless of their faith.
Human Services
2
Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of
Dedicated to serving those most in need and advocating for justice in the community
Human Services
3
Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of
Catholic charities serves those in need through transformative, empowering and dignity-affirming social service programs, guided by catholic teaching.
—
4
Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of
Provides transformative services that empower families to overcome barriers and achieve self-sufficiency.
Human Services
5
Catholic Charities of the Diocese
To proclaim christs gospel of life and promote human dignity by alleviating poverty and strenghting individuals and families
Human Services
6
Missionary Daughters of the Eternal Father
As Charismatic women of the Catholic church, seek to let our light shine through taken care of the sick, the aged, the disabled, and individuals with different kinds of disabilitiues.
Religion
7
Home of Peace Charity Fund
Support of Home of Peace Catholic orphanages
Human Services
8
Catherines Childrens Home
Help transform the lives of abandoned special needs and medically fragile children in Baja California, Mexico
Human Services
9
Catholic Charities of California
To promote the social welfare of california, with particular regard for the poor and marginalized through the twelve diocesan charities agencies.
—
10
St Therese of the Little Flower
The organization serves as a mission board for the christian missionary endeavors of the religious order - sisters of st. therese of the child jesus bukoba diocese tanzania africa (an order of catholic missionary nuns of the mwanza…
International
11
For His Children
The organization is a christ-centered ministry providing personalized care to vulnerable and orphaned children in ecuador who have experienced abandonment, abuse, or neglect.
Unclassified
12
Catholic Charities of the Texas
Catholic charities of the texas panhandle supports the value and dignity of human life by working to promote self-worth and independence, and strives to meet the ever-changing needs of the community.
Human Services
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Adoptions From the Heart Inc and the most unlike its peers is Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
International$159,390Other$104,050Human Services$67,800Health$10,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WORLD VILLAGES FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES FAMILY CENTER ↗
- Who funds MUSTARD SEED COMMUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds LIFE-GIVING WOUNDS CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ADOPTIONS FROM THE HEART ↗
- Who funds ST LUKE FOUNDATION FOR HAITI ↗
- Who funds CHINA LITTLE FLOWER ↗
- Who funds CENTRO TEPEYAC INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
The Blackbaud Giving FundSC10.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation ANIMA CHRISTI RETREATS INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: LIFE-GIVING WOUNDS CORPORATION.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~9 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 5 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
5 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 7.8× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 850749460 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on LIFE-GIVING WOUNDS CORPORATION, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 9 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 5% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Anima Christi Retreats Inc?
Find your warmest path to Anima Christi Retreats Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines