· Public charity
Andrew Wommack Ministries Inc
Andrew Wommack Ministries is committed to teaching the truth of the Gospel through TV, radio, printed material, audio and video media, and the internet.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2020.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 43 grants below total $15,508,022 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $15,863,026 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $355,004 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2020
- Under $10k2 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k36 grants · $652k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $372k
- $250k+2 grants · $14M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| New Life Holding Corporation | $14,109,195 |
| Kenneth Copeland Ministries | $360,000 |
| Charis Enterprises Inc | $191,502 |
| Life Network | $120,000 |
| Watersprings Ranch | $60,000 |
| Joyful Word Ministries | $40,576 |
| Christ In Action | $40,000 |
| World Mission Outreach Church Inc | $36,000 |
| Duane Sheriff Ministries | $35,000 |
| Springs Rescue Mission | $34,000 |
| Tell My People Inc | $30,000 |
| Students for Life of America Inc | $28,400 |
| Tioga Christian Church | $24,050 |
| Heart of God Fellowship | $24,000 |
| Woodland Park Pregnancy Ctr Choices | $22,165 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–20, $140k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 18% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
36 repeat relationships — 33 still active in FY2020, 3 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2020, 7% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LNLife Network3× · 2018–2020 · $276k · revenue +259%
- WRWATERSPRINGS RANCH INC3× · 2018–2020 · $175k · revenue +55%
- TSTHE SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION3× · 2018–2020 · $115k · revenue +7%
Funded once
- CDCreflo Dollar Enterprises LLCone grant, 2018 · $70k
- LMLOGOS MINISTRIES INTERNATIONALone grant, 2018 · $30k · revenue -94%
- GMGOTELL MINISTRIES INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $23k · revenue +144%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ
Religious Purposes
Teach the word of god
Reconciliaton Ministries Intl. is a Christian evangelical organization preaching and teaching the Word of God in over 60 countries. The ministry equips and encourages Christians everywhere to be saved, healed, and delivered according to…
Preaching the Gospel in Crusades
As Christs followers, we have the Holy Spirit residing within us, which means we have His power to fulfill this command. We cant save anyone, but its our responsibility to tell people about the God who can. How will they believe unless…
To spread the Gospel of Jesus the Christ
To preach the gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ to the Nations
To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades
The mission is to train and equip leaders. To help all believers reach their full potential and divine destiny, that they may become all that God has called them to be.
Spread the Christianity
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Equip Ministries International and the most unlike its peers is Joyful Word Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 84% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds New Life Holding Corporation ↗
- Who funds Life Network ↗
- Who funds WATERSPRINGS RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds THE SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds BOB CROW WORLD MISSIONS OUTREACH CHURCH INC ↗
- Who funds Joyful Word Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds TELL MY PEOPLE INC ↗
- Who funds Christ In Action Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds WOODLAND PARK PREGNANCY CENTER ↗
- Who funds BILL KAISER MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Greg Fritz Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds REDEEMING LOVE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds Crossroads Ministries USA Inc ↗
- Who funds THE INSTITUTE OF MINISTRY MANAGEMENT & LEADERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds Kingdom Life Ministries International ↗
- Who funds Jerry Garcia Ministries International ↗
- Who funds Gospel Homes For Women ↗
- Who funds HOPE FOR TOMORROW ↗
- Who funds LOGOS MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds ASIA VISION INC ↗
- Who funds Students for Life of America Inc ↗
- Who funds Heart of the Father Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Andrew Wommack Ministries Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Abe Brown Ministries Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Andrew Wommack Ministries Inc?
Find your warmest path to Andrew Wommack Ministries Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.