· Private foundation
Andrew P Caneza Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k10 grants · $38k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $114k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $230k
- $250k+3 grants · $1.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BISHOP MOORE CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL | $500,000 |
| CRISTO REY - ORLANDO HIGH SCHOOL | $250,000 |
| DIOCESE OF SAVANNAH - HARVEST OF HOPE | $250,000 |
| MORNING STAR CATHOLIC SCHOOL | $180,000 |
| CHOICE WOMEN'S CLINIC | $50,000 |
| HADDIS MINISTRIES | $47,000 |
| THE RUSSELL HOME | $15,000 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF WEST ALABAMA | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $12,000 |
| ANNUNCIATION CATHOLIC CHURCH | $10,000 |
| BULLY UP RESCUE | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| NEW HOPE FOR KIDS | $5,000 |
| FIRST BAPTIST OF SWEETWATER - WEKIVA FOSTER CLOSET | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $536k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 13% of Andrew P Caneza Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 54% of the giving stays in FL; read by stated purpose it is 50% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
36 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $267k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CWCHOICES WOMEN'S CLINIC INC8× · 2017–2025 · $405k · revenue +205%
- HMHADDIS MINISTRIES5× · 2021–2025 · $322k · revenue +217% · 34% of their budget
- OHOrlando Health Foundation Inc2× · 2022–2024 · $235k · revenue +37%
Funded once
- DODIOCESE OF SAVANNAH - OUR LADY OF LOURDESone grant, 2021 · $200k
- JLJMJ LIFE CENTER INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $75k · revenue +42%
- DRDISASTER RELIEF FUND - DIOCESE OF SAINT PETERSBURGone grant, 2024 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Animal welfare we are a Boxer Rescue that our purpose is to get all surrendered boxers rehabbed and vetted all shots training and other services they need before adopting them to their forever home
Rescue pointer dogs and treat back to health and f
To assist in the medical care, misc care and rehoming of animals that do not have a home
beagle rescue
We are a small group of like-minded individuals who strongly believe that rescue should be all about the dogs. We are committed to making sure that all proceeds are spent on rescuing and caring for the Brittanys and Brittany mixes that we…
The Organization's mission is to rescue dogs from high-kill animal shelters and place them in loving forever homes. All dogs rescued are given necessary medical care prior to adoption, including required vaccinations. Dogs are placed in…
Animal rescue and adoption facilitator to permanent homes.
A 'no kill shelter', pet rescue by judy, inc. is an organization, primarily dedicated to the mission of "rescuing, rehabilitating, resocializing, and rehoming of companion animals." we provide spay/neuter surgeries, vaccines,…
To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.
Dog rescue and care nurturing finding a home
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Hope for Kids Inc and the most unlike its peers is Furever Bully Love Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 29% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 18% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHOICES WOMEN'S CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds HADDIS MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds Orlando Health Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR FOSTER CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds NEW HOPE FOR KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds JMJ LIFE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM RIDE INC ↗
- Who funds The Catholic Foundation of Central Florida Inc ↗
- Who funds CHANCE 2 DANCE INC ↗
- Who funds Orlando Health Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMISSION 127 INC ↗
- Who funds NIGHTLIGHT CHRISTIAN ADOPTIONS ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF WEST AL ↗
- Who funds CHI CHI'S RESCUE RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds THE LIFEBOAT PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds SERVANTS OF THE PIERCED HEARTS OF JESUS AND MARY INC ↗
- Who funds MONTESSORI AT ROSEBOROUGH INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Central Florida Foundation · Adventist Health SystemSunbelt Inc · Magruder Chesley G Fdn Im · Universal Orlando Foundation Inc · The Chatlos Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · The Earl and Bettie Fields Automotive Group Foundation Inc · The Dr P Phillips Foundation · Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Andrew P Caneza Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Meals On Wheels Etc Inc — 18% of income from government
- Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc — 0% of income from government
- Orlando Health Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Andrew P Caneza Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Andrew P Caneza Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.