Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Anderson Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3k
Granted FY2023
2
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Education$3.3MHealth$660kRecreation & Sports$120kReligion$113kYouth Development$20kArts & Culture$6kHousing & Shelter$1kInternational$200
02FY2023 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROCK CHALK ROUNDBALL CLASSIC$2,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREATER LOS ANGELES$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FAITHWORKS OF THE INNER CITY INC: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
NJ
CT
CA
NE
MO
DE
KS
OK
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.7M · 9 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
33

Total granted

$2.7M
$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-10%
+93%

Still filing today

44%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Youth DevelopmentHealthEducationRecreation & SportsArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KE
    KU ENDOWMENT
    3× · 2020–2022 · $2.5M
  • CC
    CORPUS CHRISTI PARISH
    2× · 2020–2021 · $78k
  • CC
    CRESPI CARMELITE HIGH SCHOOL
    2× · 2019–2021 · $30k

Funded once

  • LH
    LMH HEALTH FOUNDATION - STOCK DONATION
    one grant, 2019 · $626k
  • KU
    KANSAS UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENT ASSOCIATION - STOCK DONATION
    one grant, 2017 · $382k
  • TK
    The Kansas University Endowment Associationgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $300k · revenue +93%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Faith Baptist Bible College

Post secondary and graduate educational institution The mission of Faith Baptist Bible College and Theological Seminary is to equip vocational Christian workers and other servant leaders while inspiring them to take the Word to the world.

Education
2
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
3
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
4
Franklin University

Since 1902, Franklin University has been a pioneer in meeting the needs of adult students who have the ambition to continue their education in combination with other responsibilities, receiving its status as a tax exempt organization in…

5
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

6
Kansas Wesleyan University

Kansas wesleyan university is a liberal arts college that promotes and integrates academic excellence, spiritual development, personal well-being, and social responsibility.

Education
7
Faith Baptist Bible College Inc

Educate children in a christian environment

Education
8
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
9
Family Service and Guidance Center of Topeka Inc

Family service and guidance center provides quality behavioral healthcare to children and families. vision: family service and guidance center shall be the premier, outcomes-focused children and family behavioral healthcare center that…

Health
10
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
11
Wallin Education Partners

To ensure college and career success for high-potential students from low-income backgrounds, and through our efforts help build diverse, equitable, and vibrant communities. we do this through a comprehensive model of financial aid and…

Education
12
Bethel University

We educate and equip students to lead lives of impact through transformative academics in a christ-centered community.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise Inc and the most unlike its peers is Shine in Darkness Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
8/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

KU ENDOWMENT — $2,526,000 · OtherKU ENDOWMENTLMH HEALTH FOUNDATION - STOCK DONATION — $626,334 · OtherLMH HEALTH FOUNDATION - STOCK DONATIONKANSAS UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENT ASSOCIATION - STOCK DONATION — $381,920 · OtherKANSAS UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENT ASSOCIATION - STOCK DONATION+25 more — $215,950 · Other+25 moreThe Kansas University Endowment Association — $300,000 · Education+2 more — $6,100 · EducationTeam First Foundation — $100,000 · Recreation & SportsHEARTLAND MEDICAL CLINIC INC — $30,000 · HealthROCK CHALK ROUNDBALL CLASSIC — $2,000 · Health+1 more — $500 · HealthHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentSHINE IN DARKNESS FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREATER LOS ANGELES — $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LAWRENCE INC — $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentFISHTANK THEATRE INC — $1,000 · Arts & CultureFAMILY PROMISE INC — $1,000 · Housing & ShelterFaithworks of the Inner City Inc — $500 · Human Services
Other$3,750,204Education$306,100Recreation & Sports$100,000Health$32,500Youth Development$22,000Arts & Culture$1,000Housing & Shelter$1,000Human Services$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Kansas University Endowment Association — $300,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTeam First Foundation — $100,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetHEARTLAND MEDICAL CLINIC INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAM WOODS UNIVERSITY — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHINE IN DARKNESS FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROCK CHALK ROUNDBALL CLASSIC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREATER LOS ANGELES — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LAWRENCE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFISHTANK THEATRE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFaithworks of the Inner City Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BERT NASH COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Kansas University Endowment Association
  • Who funds Team First Foundation
  • Who funds HEARTLAND MEDICAL CLINIC INC
  • Who funds HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES
  • Who funds WILLIAM WOODS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds SHINE IN DARKNESS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
  • Who funds ROCK CHALK ROUNDBALL CLASSIC
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREATER LOS ANGELES
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LAWRENCE INC
  • Who funds FISHTANK THEATRE INC
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE INC
  • Who funds Faithworks of the Inner City Inc
  • Who funds THE BERT NASH COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Douglas County Community FoundationKS13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Douglas County Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Anderson Family Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Family Promise Inc2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph