Skip to content
Amoskeag Health at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Amoskeag Health

The mission of Amoskeag Health is to improve the health and well-being of our patients and the communities we serve by providing exceptional care and services that are accessible to all.

$482k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$93k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$974kHealth$510kRecreation & Sports$84kYouth Development$81kPhilanthropy$9k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $472,082, the rows itemized in this filing. The $482,387 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $10,305 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $213k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $239k
$31,920
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Granite YMCA$93,180
YWCA New Hampshire$75,553
Makin It Happen Coalition for Resilient Youth Inc$70,224
Seacoast Youth Services$35,216
Granite United Way$35,159
The Upper Room$32,963
UpReach Therapeutic Equestrian Center Inc$31,920
TLC Family Resource Center$30,874
United Way of Greater Nashua Inc$23,997
Waypoint$22,920
Hinsdale Police Department$7,988
Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Manchester$6,205
Milford Thrives$5,883
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $608k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 8% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%YWCA: $9k → 14%Easter Seals: $115k → 7%TLC Family Resource Center: $31k → 10%YWCA: $9k → 14%Easter Seals: $102k → 7%Seacoast Youth Services: $35k → 5%Southern New Hampshire Services: $59k → 7%Southern New Hampshire Services: $28k → 7%Organization for Refugee and Immigrant Success: $12k → 7%Child and Family Services of New Hampshire: $108k → 7%Child and Family Services of New Hampshire: $100k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 22% of Amoskeag Health’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in NH; by stated purpose, 79%.

Amoskeag Healthlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 21% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 13 repeat orgs$573k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +9% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
7

Total granted

$1.1M
$375k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
0%

Still filing today

77%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $198k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’24’25
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • W
    WAYPOINT
    4× · 2017–2025 · $247k · revenue +92%
  • ES
    Easter Seals New Hampshire Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $217k · revenue +76%
  • SN
    SOUTHERN NEW HAMPSHIRE SERVICES INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $87k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • LH
    Lamprey Health Care Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $125k · revenue 0%
  • GS
    Greater Seacoast Community Health
    one grant, 2024 · $125k · revenue 0%
  • AC
    Ammonoosuc Community Health Services Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $95k · revenue +9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Hampshire Children's Health Foundation
Health
2
Southern New Hampshire Health System Inc

Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.

Health
3
Health Strategies of New Hampshire Inc
Health
4
Families First of the Greater Seacoast

To contribute to the health and wellbeing of the Seacoast Community by providing a broad range of health and family services to all regardless of ability to pay. The fiscal year 2017 total charity care is $4,891,510, which includes…

—
5
Upper Valley Comm Health Services Inc

UVCHS in a not for profit organization that provides medical dental behavioral heath and pharmacy services. Our goal is to make quality care available to everyone regardless of demographic or economic status. We accept all major insurances…

Health
6
Addiction Recovery Coalition of New Hampshire

ARCNH community recovery center is a Peer-to-Peer recovery coaching program that is designed to provide those on the path to recovery with individualized care and support from those with personal experiences with SUDS

Health
7
Merrimack Valley Day Care Service

Daycare services

—
8
Bank of New Hampshire Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Harbor Homes Inc

Harbor Care's mission is to provide vital services, including housing and healthcare to all in our communities needing assistance. Our vision is one where everyone gets to live safe, stable, and healthy lives, filled with purpose, respect…

Housing & Shelter
10
New Hampshire Public Health Association

Nhpha is a member driven organization that champions public health policy and practice, enriches the workforce and inspires leaders to improve the publics health.

—
11
MaineGeneral Health

To enhance, every day, the health of our patients, our families and our communities. We do that through a range of health care services for people of all ages, in a variety of care settings.

Health
12
The Well Ne

The Well's mission is to deliver real solutions in behavioral health through compassion, innovation, and collaboration. By building an inclusive community, we offer comprehensive treatment and resources to empower individuals of diverse…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southern New Hampshire Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Easter Seals New Hampshire Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
10/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WAYPOINT: $246,536 · Human ServicesWAYPOINTEaster Seals New Hampshire Inc: $216,976 · Human ServicesEaster Seals New Hampshire IncSOUTHERN NEW HAMPSHIRE SERVICES INC: $87,245 · Human ServicesSOUTHERN NEW HAMPSHIRE SERVICES INCSeacoast Youth Services: $35,216 · Human ServicesSeacoast Youth ServicesTLC FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $30,874 · Human Services+2 more: $29,825 · Human ServicesYWCA NEW HAMPSHIRE: $108,607 · OtherYWCA NEW HAMPSHIREThe Granite Young Men's Christian Association: $93,180 · OtherThe Granite Young Men's Christ…Manchester Health Department: $50,000 · OtherManchester Health DepartmentGRANITE UNITED WAY: $44,645 · OtherGRANITE UNITED WAYMPD: $44,105 · OtherMPDMilford Thrives: $40,000 · OtherMilford ThrivesTHE UPPER ROOM A FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $32,963 · OtherTHE UPPER ROOM A FAMILY RESOUR…Town of Lancaster NH: $17,259 · Other+3 more: $17,571 · OtherLamprey Health Care Inc: $125,000 · HealthLamprey Health Care IncGreater Seacoast Community Health: $125,000 · HealthGreater Seacoast Commun…Ammonoosuc Community Health Services Inc: $95,000 · HealthAmmonoosuc Community He…MAKIN IT HAPPEN COALITION FOR RESILIENT YOUTH INC: $85,459 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER MANCHESTER: $6,205 · Youth DevelopmentUPREACH THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC: $83,545 · Recreation & SportsUNITED WAY OF GREATER NASHUA INC: $43,619 · Philanthropy
Human Services$646,672Other$448,330Health$345,000Youth Development$91,664Recreation & Sports$83,545Philanthropy$43,619

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWAYPOINT: $246,536 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetEaster Seals New Hampshire Inc: $216,976 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLamprey Health Care Inc: $125,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGreater Seacoast Community Health: $125,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetYWCA NEW HAMPSHIRE: $108,607 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetAmmonoosuc Community Health Services Inc: $95,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetThe Granite Young Men's Christian Association: $93,180 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTHERN NEW HAMPSHIRE SERVICES INC: $87,245 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMAKIN IT HAPPEN COALITION FOR RESILIENT YOUTH INC: $85,459 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetUPREACH THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC: $83,545 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetGRANITE UNITED WAY: $44,645 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER NASHUA INC: $43,619 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetMilford Thrives: $40,000 over 2y, 32% of budgetTHE UPPER ROOM A FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $32,963 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetTLC FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $30,874 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetYWCA USA INC: $17,755 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetORGANIZATION FOR REFUGEE AND: $12,070 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Mental Health Center of Greater Manchester Inc: $6,879 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER MANCHESTER: $6,205 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER DERRY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $5,684 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS NEW HAMPSHIRE: $5,008 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charita…Granite United WayArthur Jr Dobles & Ol…Endowment For Health …Eastern Bank Foundati…Mary Hitchcock Memori…Cogswell Benevolent T…United Way Of Massach…Eversource Energy Fou…Td Charitable Foundat…Fidelity FoundationPoint32health Foundat…
New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH44.1× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Granite United Way · Arthur Jr Dobles & Olive G Dobles Crut · Endowment For Health Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Mary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · Td Charitable Foundation · Fidelity Foundation · Point32health Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Amoskeag Health funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Amoskeag Health. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Amoskeag Health’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home