Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Amoskeag Health

The mission of Amoskeag Health is to improve the health and well-being of our patients and the communities we serve by providing exceptional care and services that are accessible to all.

$482k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$93k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$974kHealth$510kRecreation & Sports$84kYouth Development$81kPhilanthropy$9k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 13 grants below total $472,082 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $482,387 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $10,305 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $213k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $239k
$31,920
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Granite YMCA$93,180
YWCA New Hampshire$75,553
Makin It Happen Coalition for Resilient Youth Inc$70,224
Seacoast Youth Services$35,216
Granite United Way$35,159
The Upper Room$32,963
UpReach Therapeutic Equestrian Center Inc$31,920
TLC Family Resource Center$30,874
United Way of Greater Nashua Inc$23,997
Waypoint$22,920
Hinsdale Police Department$7,988
Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Manchester$6,205
Milford Thrives$5,883
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $608k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 8% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%YWCA: $9k → 14%Easter Seals: $115k → 7%TLC Family Resource Center: $31k → 10%YWCA: $9k → 14%Easter Seals: $102k → 7%Seacoast Youth Services: $35k → 5%Southern New Hampshire Services: $59k → 7%Southern New Hampshire Services: $28k → 7%Organization for Refugee and Immigrant Success: $12k → 7%Child and Family Services of New Hampshire: $108k → 7%Child and Family Services of New Hampshire: $100k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 22% of Amoskeag Health’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in NH; read by stated purpose it is 79% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Amoskeag Healthlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 21% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 13 repeat orgs$573k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +9% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
7

Total granted

$1.1M
$375k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
0%

Still filing today

77%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $198k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’24’25
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • W
    WAYPOINT
    4× · 2017–2025 · $247k · revenue +92%
  • ES
    Easter Seals New Hampshire Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $217k · revenue +76%
  • SN
    SOUTHERN NEW HAMPSHIRE SERVICES INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $87k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • LH
    Lamprey Health Care Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $125k · revenue 0%
  • GS
    Greater Seacoast Community Health
    one grant, 2024 · $125k · revenue 0%
  • AC
    Ammonoosuc Community Health Services Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $95k · revenue +9%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Hampshire Children's Health Foundation
Health
2
Southern New Hampshire Health System Inc

Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.

Health
3
Health Strategies of New Hampshire Inc
Health
4
Families First of the Greater Seacoast

To contribute to the health and wellbeing of the Seacoast Community by providing a broad range of health and family services to all regardless of ability to pay. The fiscal year 2017 total charity care is $4,891,510, which includes…

5
Addiction Recovery Coalition of New Hampshire

ARCNH community recovery center is a Peer-to-Peer recovery coaching program that is designed to provide those on the path to recovery with individualized care and support from those with personal experiences with SUDS

Health
6
Upper Valley Comm Health Services Inc

UVCHS in a not for profit organization that provides medical dental behavioral heath and pharmacy services. Our goal is to make quality care available to everyone regardless of demographic or economic status. We accept all major insurances…

Health
7
Merrimack Valley Day Care Service

Daycare services

8
Bank of New Hampshire Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Harbor Homes Inc

Harbor Care's mission is to provide vital services, including housing and healthcare to all in our communities needing assistance. Our vision is one where everyone gets to live safe, stable, and healthy lives, filled with purpose, respect…

Housing & Shelter
10
New Hampshire Public Health Association

Nhpha is a member driven organization that champions public health policy and practice, enriches the workforce and inspires leaders to improve the publics health.

11
The Well Ne

The Well's mission is to deliver real solutions in behavioral health through compassion, innovation, and collaboration. By building an inclusive community, we offer comprehensive treatment and resources to empower individuals of diverse…

Health
12
New Hampshire Outright

To create a safe space for youth to explore topics of gender and sexuality in a welcoming and understanding environment.

Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southern New Hampshire Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Easter Seals New Hampshire Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 53 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr18%24%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr17%38%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr20%21%10–20yr18%17%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr17%42%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/23
the rest of the field
9%
416/4,430

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
10/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WAYPOINT — $246,536 · Human ServicesWAYPOINTEaster Seals New Hampshire Inc — $216,976 · Human ServicesEaster Seals New Hampshire IncSOUTHERN NEW HAMPSHIRE SERVICES INC — $87,245 · Human ServicesSOUTHERN NEW HAMPSHIRE SERVICES INCSeacoast Youth Services — $35,216 · Human ServicesSeacoast Youth ServicesTLC FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER — $30,874 · Human Services+2 more — $29,825 · Human ServicesYWCA NEW HAMPSHIRE — $108,607 · OtherYWCA NEW HAMPSHIREThe Granite Young Men's Christian Association — $93,180 · OtherThe Granite Young Men's Christ…Manchester Health Department — $50,000 · OtherManchester Health DepartmentGRANITE UNITED WAY — $44,645 · OtherGRANITE UNITED WAYMPD — $44,105 · OtherMPDMilford Thrives — $40,000 · OtherMilford ThrivesTHE UPPER ROOM A FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER — $32,963 · OtherTHE UPPER ROOM A FAMILY RESOUR…Town of Lancaster NH — $17,259 · Other+3 more — $17,571 · OtherLamprey Health Care Inc — $125,000 · HealthLamprey Health Care IncGreater Seacoast Community Health — $125,000 · HealthGreater Seacoast Commun…Ammonoosuc Community Health Services Inc — $95,000 · HealthAmmonoosuc Community He…MAKIN IT HAPPEN COALITION FOR RESILIENT YOUTH INC — $85,459 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER MANCHESTER — $6,205 · Youth DevelopmentUPREACH THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC — $83,545 · Recreation & SportsUNITED WAY OF GREATER NASHUA INC — $43,619 · Philanthropy
Human Services$646,672Other$448,330Health$345,000Youth Development$91,664Recreation & Sports$83,545Philanthropy$43,619

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWAYPOINT — $246,536 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetEaster Seals New Hampshire Inc — $216,976 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLamprey Health Care Inc — $125,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGreater Seacoast Community Health — $125,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetYWCA NEW HAMPSHIRE — $108,607 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetAmmonoosuc Community Health Services Inc — $95,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetThe Granite Young Men's Christian Association — $93,180 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTHERN NEW HAMPSHIRE SERVICES INC — $87,245 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMAKIN IT HAPPEN COALITION FOR RESILIENT YOUTH INC — $85,459 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetUPREACH THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC — $83,545 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetGRANITE UNITED WAY — $44,645 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER NASHUA INC — $43,619 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetMilford Thrives — $40,000 over 2y, 32% of budgetTHE UPPER ROOM A FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER — $32,963 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetTLC FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER — $30,874 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetYWCA USA INC — $17,755 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetORGANIZATION FOR REFUGEE AND — $12,070 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Mental Health Center of Greater Manchester Inc — $6,879 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER MANCHESTER — $6,205 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER DERRY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES INC — $5,684 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS NEW HAMPSHIRE — $5,008 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH44.1× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Granite United Way · Arthur Jr Dobles & Olive G Dobles Crut · Endowment For Health Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Mary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · Td Charitable Foundation · Fidelity Foundation · Point32health Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Amoskeag Health funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph