Skip to content

· Private foundation

American Water Charitable Foundationinc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$5.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
374
Grants FY2025still arriving
20
States reached
$615k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$3.8MPhilanthropy$3.2MRecreation & Sports$2.9MCommunity Improvement$2.2MEducation$1.9MHuman Services$1.3MYouth Development$1.1MArts & Culture$1.1MOther$0
02FY2025 · 374 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k227 grants · $773k
  • $10k–50k131 grants · $2.4M
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $855k
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.4M
$5,000
Median grant
20
States reached
$82M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION$614,954
UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE$300,000
DREAM MACHINE INNOVATION LAB$285,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$250,000
SHIRLEY HEINZE LAND TR INC$150,000
WATERWAYS$100,000
WABASH RIVER ENHANCEMENT CORP$92,300
FOUR MILE RUN CONSERVATORY FOUNDATION$77,000
HISTORIC HOPEWELL FOUNDATION INC$70,000
Individual grant recipient$62,500
FRIENDS OF THE PARKS IN FAYETTE COUNTY INC$53,025
THE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC$50,000
TENNESSEE AQUARIUM$50,000
GREATER WILKES-BARRE CHAMBER OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRY$50,000
GIRL SCOUTS OF BLACK DIAMOND COUNCIL$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $2.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SHENANGO VALLEY URBAN LEAGUE INC: $10k → 13%INDIANACOUNTY COMMUNITYACTIONPROGRAM: $10k → 14%NAT'L URBAN LEAGUE INC: $260k → 17%FORT FREEDOM INC: $13k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $15k → 14%YOUTH IN NEED: $10k → 5%GOLDEN GIRLS INC: $25k → 18%MIDWEST FOOD BANK NFP: $10k → 11%ALIVE INC: $10k → 9%HARFORD COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $15k → 7%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $15k → 10%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $10k → 17%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $250k → 14%TRICITY FAMILY SERVICES: $13k → 8%CHRISTIAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS: $10k → 16%HARFORD COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $10k → 7%IMPERIAL BEACH NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $15k → 11%AMERICAN CORPORATE PARTNERS: $25k → 17%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $250k → 14%URBAN LEAGUE OF NORTHWEST INDIANA INC: $10k → 15%NATURE WORX INC: $27k → 7%OUTREACH - CENTER FOR COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $10k → 13%GATHERING FOR WOMEN - MONTEREY: $10k → 12%AMERICAN CORPORATE PARTNERS: $25k → 17%YMIC FOUNDATION INC: $25k → 6%EXTENDED CHILD CARE COALITION OF SONOMA COUNTY: $15k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $45k → 14%WAYFINDER FAMILY SERVICES: $30k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 14%URBAN LEAGUE OF ESSEX COUNTY: $10k → 16%GREATER SACRAMENTO URBAN LEAGUE: $10k → 12%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $15k → 14%EXETER COMMUNITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $16k → 11%HOPE OF THE VALLEY RESCUE MISSION: $25k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $15k → 14%HISPANIC FAMILY CENTER SOUTHERN NJ INC: $25k → 12%NATUREWORX INC: $14k → 7%ROOTS & WINGS FOUNDATION A NEW JERSEY NON PROFIT CORPORATION: $10k → 4%HISPANIC FAMILY CENTER SOUTHERN NJ INC: $25k → 12%ACLAMO FAMILY CENTERS: $25k → 7%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS PAYMENT: $13k → 14%GREATER PEORIA FAMILY YMCA AWCF: $25k → 14%THE CATHEDRAL SOUP KITCHEN INC: $25k → 12%CATHEDRAL KITCHEN: $25k → 12%CATHEDRAL KITCHEN: $23k → 12%HOPE FOR THE INNER CITY INC: $20k → 12%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSN OF CHARLESTON AND THE KANAWHA VALLEY: $13k → 18%CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES INC: $25k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 303 repeat orgs$8.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

303 repeat relationships: 149 still active in FY2025, 154 since wound down; 201 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

303
772

Total granted

$12M
$6.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+10%

Still filing today

86%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationEnvironmentHealthArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NR
    NATIONAL RECREATION AND PARK ASSOCIATION
    4× · 2018–2021 · $2.4M · revenue +31%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    8× · 2017–2025 · $643k · revenue +46%
  • UA
    Upstream Alliance Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $301k · revenue +142%

Funded once

  • NP
    NRPA PROJECT GRANTS
    one grant, 2017 · $450k
  • CO
    CITY OF EAST RIDGE
    one grant, 2022 · $250k
  • HF
    Heartland Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue +8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
2
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
3
Cedar Valley United Way

Uniting our community to empower individuals and families to thrive.

Philanthropy
4
United Way of the Csra Inc

United way of the csra mobilizes the caring power of our community to make lasting change on the issues that matter most in our region. we want to ensure that children, young adults, and families have the tools and resources they need to…

—
5
United Way of Central Ohio Inc

United way of central ohio is the local organization that harnesses the power of communities working together - people, nonprofits, businesses and government - to create a stronger, more equitable central ohio. see schedule o.we do this…

Philanthropy
6
United Way of Cumberland County Inc

Organization is dedicated to raising funds for programs that meet the human care needs of the people of cumberland county.

Philanthropy
7
Community Action Commission

Commmunity action commission's mission is to build on the strengths and resources available, provide solutions, for complex issues, and empower individuals, families, and communities to move out of poverty.

Human Services
8
United Way of East Central Iowa

Unite the caring power of communities to invest in effective solutions to improve people's lives.

Philanthropy
9
United Way of Bucks County

United way of bucks county creates opportunities for quality education, financial stability, and good health to ensure real, lasting change for individuals and our communities.

Philanthropy
10
United Way of Clinton County Iowa

To provide leadership in our communities to 1) identify our most pressing human care needs, 2) to work together to direct the time, energy and resources towards addressing those needs to improve our quality of life.

—
11
Montco Anti-Hunger Network

By leading coordinated action, montco anti-hunger network strengthens the food security safety net system in montgomery county, pa, working to end hunger in montgomery county.

Food & Nutrition
12
Philadelphia Works Inc

Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Access Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Kiwanis Foundation of Allentown. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

921 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 921 of the 1,311 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
151
Early backer (in before they grew)
894/921
Grantees still filing
499/921
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE BENEVITY COMMUNITY IMPACT FUND: $1,272,577 · OtherTHE BENEVITY COMMUNITY IMPACT FUNDNRPA PROJECT GRANTS: $450,000 · OtherNRPA PROJECT GRANTSCITY OF EAST RIDGE: $250,000 · OtherHeartland Foundation: $250,000 · OtherWATER FOR PEOPLE: $250,000 · OtherDREAM MACHINE INNOVATION LAB: $285,000 · Other+99 more: $4,489,636 · Other+99 moreNATIONAL RECREATION AND PARK ASSOCIATION: $2,350,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL RECREATION AND PARK…Upstream Alliance Inc: $301,200 · EnvironmentUpstream Alliance IncWaterWays: $181,660 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE LOWER APPOMATTOX RIVER: $162,828 · EnvironmentSHIRLEY HEINZE LAND TRUST INC: $150,000 · Environment+26 more: $1,308,241 · Environment+26 moreAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC: $1,654,423 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ONLINE G…UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $400,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY WORLDW…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY: $150,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDAT…THE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC: $100,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY: $92,486 · Philanthropy+8 more: $277,804 · Philanthropy+8 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $643,030 · Human ServicesAmerican …NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $270,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL …THE CATHEDRAL SOUP KITCHEN INC: $86,500 · Human ServicesTHE CATHE…HISPANIC FAMILY CENTER OF SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY INC: $55,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN CORPORATE PARTNERS: $50,000 · Human Services+11 more: $325,000 · Human Services+11 moreJACKIE JOYNER KERSEE FOUNDATION: $250,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF BLACK DIAMOND COUNCIL INC: $79,500 · Youth DevelopmentTHE MALCOLM JENKINS FOUNDATION: $65,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHERN ILLINOIS: $55,455 · Youth DevelopmentBoys & Girls Clubs of Union County Inc: $39,970 · Youth DevelopmentBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE MISSISSIPPI VALLEY: $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentMEARTH: $31,675 · Youth DevelopmentWILDERNESS KIDS ALEXANDRIA INC: $29,000 · Youth DevelopmentLUCY OUTREACH A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $25,500 · Youth DevelopmentP-Town Car Club Inc: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentHuntington Children's Museum Inc: $164,520 · Arts & CultureCLAY CENTER FOR THE ARTS & SCIENCES OF WV INC: $100,000 · Arts & CultureHISTORIC HOPEWELL FOUNDATION INC: $70,000 · Arts & CultureColor The Block: $68,000 · Arts & CultureTERRE HAUTE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM FOUNDATION OF PACIFIC GROVE INC: $45,875 · Arts & CultureARMORY CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $25,000 · Arts & CultureMISSION WEST VIRGINIA INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureDELTA EDUCATIONAL CULTURAL SOCIETY: $25,000 · Arts & CultureHOPEWORKS 'N CAMDEN INC: $80,000 · EducationTeach for America Inc: $50,000 · EducationSacramento Splash: $40,000 · EducationLEWIS & CLARK COMM COLLEGE FOUND: $34,250 · EducationIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $32,500 · EducationBELLEVILLE TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 201 EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $30,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF JENNINGS DISTRICT FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationMERISTEM INC: $25,000 · EducationWEST VIRGINIA WOMEN WORK: $25,000 · EducationTHE ALLIANCE FOR HEALTH EQUITY: $25,000 · EducationTHADDEUS STEVENS FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF WEST VIRGINIA INC: $25,000 · EducationMonterey Peninsula College Foundation: $25,000 · EducationVALLEY VIEW EDUCATIONAL ENRICHMENT FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationSTEAM ON WHEELS: $25,000 · Education21st Century Charter School of Gary co GEO Foundation: $25,000 · Education
Other$7,247,213Environment$4,453,929Philanthropy$2,674,713Human Services$1,429,530Youth Development$636,100Arts & Culture$573,395Education$516,750

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL RECREATION AND PARK ASSOCIATION: $2,350,000 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC: $1,654,423 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $643,030 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $400,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUpstream Alliance Inc: $301,200 over 4y, 20% of budgetNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $270,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJACKIE JOYNER KERSEE FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetHeartland Foundation: $250,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetWATER FOR PEOPLE: $250,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER FOR AQUATIC SCIENCES: $235,000 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetCOALFIELD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $187,500 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetWaterWays: $181,660 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetHuntington Children's Museum Inc: $164,520 over 1y, 16% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE LOWER APPOMATTOX RIVER: $162,828 over 4y, 38% of budgetFeeding America: $150,425 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY: $150,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $119,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBLUEGRASS GREENSOURCE INC: $117,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetNAHANT MARSH EDUCATION CENTER: $113,200 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetJAMES RIVER ASSOCIATION: $100,781 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCLAY CENTER FOR THE ARTS & SCIENCES OF WV INC: $100,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetWABASH RIVER ENHANCEMENT CORPORATIO ATTN STANTON LAMBERT: $97,300 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY: $92,486 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CATHEDRAL SOUP KITCHEN INC: $86,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetHOPEWORKS 'N CAMDEN INC: $80,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF BLACK DIAMOND COUNCIL INC: $79,500 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetFOUR MILE RUN CONSERVATORY FOUNDATION: $77,000 over 1y, 47% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $75,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTennessee Aquarium: $70,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHISTORIC HOPEWELL FOUNDATION INC: $70,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetTHE FALLS OF THE OHIO FOUNDATION: $68,740 over 2y, 10% of budgetColor The Block: $68,000 over 1y, 67% of budgetTHE WATERSHED INSTITUTE INC: $66,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE MALCOLM JENKINS FOUNDATION: $65,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL WEST VIRGINIA: $62,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetBEYOND HOUSING INC: $60,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSun Foundation Environmental Sciences and Arts: $60,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA RESOURCES COUNCIL INC: $58,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHERN ILLINOIS: $55,455 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetRIVER BEND FOOD RESERVOIR: $55,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHISPANIC FAMILY CENTER OF SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY INC: $55,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NEW JERSEY: $55,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetAMERICAN RIVER PARKWAY FOUNDATION INC: $54,500 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetALLIANCE FOR THE CHESAPEAKE BAY INC: $51,776 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN CORPORATE PARTNERS: $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCHATTANOOGA CHAMBER FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTERRE HAUTE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $50,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Blue Grass Community Foundation IncKY52.1× affinity58 shared granteesties to 6 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Blue Grass Community Foundation Inc · Benwood Foundation Inc · United Way of the Bluegrass Inc · Robert F Stone Foundation AKA Bobby Stone Foundation · Truist West Virginia Foundation Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · Ee Murry Family Foundation · Keeneland Foundation Inc · The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation · Oceanfirst Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Footprint Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American Water Charitable Foundationinc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American Water Charitable Foundationinc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 28%
  • Up With Trees Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Raritan Headwaters Association: 94% of income from government
  • Camden Community Partnership Inc: 94% of income from government
  • Family Connections Inc: 83% of income from government
  • Center for Family Services: 73% of income from government
  • Maryland Assoc for Environmental & Outdoor Educati: 35% of income from government
  • Pinelands Preservation Alliance: 35% of income from government
  • Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay Inc: 28% of income from government
  • Musconetcong Watershed Association: 14% of income from government
  • Harford Community Action Agency Inc: 9% of income from government
  • The Watershed Institute Inc: 3% of income from government
  • The United Way of Central Maryland Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Students 2 Science Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
78report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
5rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1311 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on American Water Charitable Foundationinc’s filings →

More from the funding graph