Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

American Academy of Sleep Medicine Foundation

To promote discoveries that advance the understanding of sleep for healthier lives by offering research, community and training grants.

$4.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$540k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 41% of AMERICAN ACADEMY OF SLEEP MEDICINE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 23 grants below total $3,655,543 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,367,615 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $712,072 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $10k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $1.3M
  • $250k+6 grants · $2.2M
$100,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL INC$539,962
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY$450,000
MAYO CLINIC$350,000
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL$339,688
BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER$289,973
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$250,000
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$249,812
AMA FOUNDATION$224,000
EMMA PENDLETON BRADLEY HOSPITAL$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$100,000
JOHNS HOPKINS SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT FAYETTEVILLE$100,000
MINNEAPOLIS VA HEALTH CARE SYSTEM$97,246
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA$89,866
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PAJAMA PROGRAM: $20k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
OH
PA
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region — $547k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

North America (Canada and Mexico)$399k · 73% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT

East Asia and the Pacific$148k · 27% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$9.4M · 25 repeat orgs$4.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.

25 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
46

Total granted

$9.4M
$4.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+32%

Still filing today

56%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $372k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthArts & CultureScience & TechHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +64%
  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    3× · 2017–2023 · $802k · revenue +44%
  • ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI
    6× · 2019–2024 · $739k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • IU
    Indiana University School of Medicine
    one grant, 2021 · $340k
  • KP
    KAISER PERMANENTE
    one grant, 2019 · $250k
  • OS
    OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $250k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
2
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
3
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
4
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
5
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
6
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
7
Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary

THE MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY ("THE INFIRMARY") IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT TEACHING HOSPITAL CONDUCTING PATIENT CARE AND RESEARCH. THE INFIRMARY IS A TEACHING HOSPITAL OF HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL AND AN INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH.…

Health
8
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
9
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
10
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
11
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
12
Seton Hall University

Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northeastern University and the most unlike its peers is Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community FoundationsHealth Access Advocacy and …Community College Foundatio…Cancer Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 55 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%16%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%51%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%25%10–20yr16%8%20–35yr13%9%35–55yr16%52%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/84
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,481

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
52/54
Grantees still filing
42/54
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $1,789,151 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $619,414 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA — $404,968 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIAIndiana University School of Medicine — $339,934 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA — $334,666 · OtherAmerican Medical Association Foundation — $320,000 · OtherUniversity of Wisconsin Madison — $298,782 · OtherTHE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY — $275,505 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN — $252,346 · OtherKAISER PERMANENTE — $250,000 · OtherOREGON STATE UNIVERSITY — $250,000 · OtherWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY — $249,778 · Other+24 more — $1,390,546 · Other+24 moreJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $1,028,004 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $801,885 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGHICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $738,840 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAITHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $489,999 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN TH…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $449,999 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANF…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $449,459 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANI…NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY — $249,997 · EducationARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $249,983 · EducationUniversity of Miami — $249,647 · EducationYale University — $239,834 · Education+14 more — $1,089,342 · Education+14 moreBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC — $692,889 · HealthBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS…MAYO CLINIC — $417,500 · HealthMAYO CLINICVanderbilt University Medical Center — $349,660 · HealthVanderbilt University…THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION — $299,847 · HealthTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC …THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $250,000 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPIT…HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM — $249,977 · HealthHENRY FORD HEALTH SYS…GEISINGER CLINIC — $249,801 · HealthGEISINGER CLINICChildren's Hospital Corporation — $118,179 · Health+11 more — $555,303 · Health+11 moreBROWN UNIVERSITY — $250,000 · Community ImprovementNorthwestern University — $250,000 · Recreation & SportsINDEPENDENT FEATURE PROJECT INC — $20,000 · Arts & CultureWORLD SLEEP SOCIETY INC — $10,000 · Arts & CultureBEYOND BEDTIME INC — $19,958 · Human ServicesUniversity of Kansas Center for Research Inc — $19,900 · Science & Tech
Other$6,775,090Education$6,036,989Health$3,183,156Community Improvement$250,000Recreation & Sports$250,000Arts & Culture$30,000Human Services$19,958Science & Tech$19,900

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $1,028,004 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $801,885 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $738,840 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC — $692,889 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $489,999 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $449,999 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $449,459 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $417,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center — $349,660 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Medical Association Foundation — $320,000 over 3y, 8.6% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION — $299,847 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY — $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University — $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY — $249,997 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $249,983 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM — $249,977 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEISINGER CLINIC — $249,801 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami — $249,647 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYale University — $239,834 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University — $167,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University — $140,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $118,179 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER — $118,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEmma Pendleton Bradley Hospital — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $99,814 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR VETERANS RESEARCH AND EDUCATION — $97,246 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $83,786 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University — $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Health NFP — $69,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSleep Research Society Foundation (SRSF) — $64,831 over 3y, 6.6% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine — $60,978 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFoundation for the National Institutes of Health Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York — $39,987 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $38,285 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Chest Foundation — $30,000 over 2y, 9.3% of budgetRESTLESS LEGS SYNDROME FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetWELLNESS SLEEP & CIRCADIAN NETWORK INC — $20,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetSTART SCHOOL LATER INC — $20,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetSEPULVEDA RESEARCH CORPORATION — $19,983 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBEYOND BEDTIME INC — $19,958 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUniversity of Kansas Center for Research Inc — $19,900 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLoyola University Maryland Inc — $19,841 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT JOSEPH'S UNIVERSITY — $18,438 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE INC — $17,978 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Houston Community FoundationTX11.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization American Academy of Sleep Medicine Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 10%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology35% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University12% of income from government
  • Yale University12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation10% of income from government
  • Northeastern University7% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc6% of income from government
  • Loyola University Maryland Inc6% of income from government
  • University of Miami5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to American Academy of Sleep Medicine Foundation?

Find your warmest path to American Academy of Sleep Medicine Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 85 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph