Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

America's Promise the Alliance for Youth

Over the last 25 years, america's promise alliance has worked to align and amplify the efforts of individual organizations and institutions around big national goals, achieving outcomes at national scale in civic engagement, education, and workforce development.

$509k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$2.3MHealth$697kHuman Services$374kEmployment$341kYouth Development$326kPublic Benefit$325kPhilanthropy$120kHousing & Shelter$20kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$50,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BEYOND 12 EDUCATION INC$50,000
PEERFORWARD$50,000
LET'S GET READY INC$50,000
ONE MILLION DEGREES$50,000
NATIONAL COLLEGE ADVISING CORPS INC$50,000
THE BOTTOM LINE INC$50,000
ONEGOAL$50,000
IMENTOR INCORPORATED$50,000
COLLEGE POSSIBLE$50,000
10000 DEGREES$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $755k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE: $20k → 22%PROYECTO PASTORAL PROMESA BOYLE HEIGHTS: $100k → 14%ADELANTE MUJERES: $239k → 8%BETTER TOGETHER CENTRAL OREGON: $299k → 10%GREATER STARK COUNTY URBAN LEAGUE: $20k → 13%THRIVE CHICAGO: $20k → 14%THINK OF US: $20k → 22%PROYECTO PASTORAL PROMESA BOYLE HEIGHTS: $12k → 14%ADELANTE MUJERES: $9k → 8%BETTER TOGETHER CENTRAL OREGON: $4k → 10%MULTI-AGENCY ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN INC: $12k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
AZ
NM
TN
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.3M · 11 repeat orgs$2.1M to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
31

Total granted

$2.3M
$1.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+105%

Still filing today

82%
81%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’24
EducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentEmploymentHealthHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE STATEN ISLAND PARTNERSHIP FOR COMMUNITY WELLNESS INC
    3× · 2018–2021 · $336k · revenue +4%
  • MA
    MANAGED ACCESS TO CHILD HEALTH INC D/B/A PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILD HEALTH
    2× · 2018–2021 · $325k · revenue +130%
  • BT
    Better Together Central Oregon
    2× · 2018–2019 · $304k · revenue ×12

Funded once

  • CL
    CIVIC LLC
    one grant, 2017 · $325k
  • CC
    CHEROKEE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2018 · $300k
  • GD
    Georgia Department of Human Resources DFCS
    one grant, 2018 · $250k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cincinnati Youth Collaborative

Cincinnati Youth Collaborative ("CYC") empowers young people to overcome barriers and excel in education, career, and life.

Education
2
The New York Opportunity Network Inc Dba the Opportunity Network

The opportunity network ignites the drive, curiosity, and agency of underrepresented students on their paths to and through college and into thriving careers, powered by our commitment to access and community.

Education
3
San Antonio Education Fund Dba San Antonio Education Partnership

The partnership empowers students with quality educational programs, resources and counseling that will make them confident, knowledgeable and help them finish college and contribute to san antonio's future, making the students san…

Education
4
Equal Opportunity Schools

Equal opportunity schools' mission is to strengthen educator and system leader capacity to break down barriers to increase access, belonging, and success in rigorous college and career-prep secondary school courses for students of color…

Education
5
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
6
Project Grad Akron

In collaboration with community partners, project grad akron will provide a system of programs, supports, and scholarships for underrepresented students to achieve success from pre-kindergarten through career.

Education
7
New Classrooms Innovation Partners Inc

To create and inspire better ways to give every student an educational foundation for lifelong success. we imagine a world where every student attends a school that meets them where they are, adapts to the unique ways they learn, and…

Education
8
Citizen Schools Inc

In fiscal year 2025, the agency operated an americorps maker fellowship, placing 7 americorps vista members at 6 different education focused organizations in ca, ma, and ny. americorps members worked on capacity building projects to expand…

Education
9
Austin Partners in Education

Apie provides college and career readiness support through individualized academic and mentoring programs to prepare students for success.

Education
10
The Campbell Institute

Children's institute's mission is to leverage research, practice, policy, and advocacy to shift systems toward justice for families so that all of oregon's children, prenatal to grade 5, have access to opportunity.

Unclassified
11
Utah's Promise

Utah's promise (up) is committed to 100% of kids and families thriving. we unify leaders, partners, communities and systems to achieve that promise.

Philanthropy
12
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is College Summit Inc and the most unlike its peers is Niswonger Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEducation Equity LeadershipPublic University Foundatio…Government Accountability R…Child and Family ServicesElementary Literacy TutoringPublic Library SupportLand Conservation Organizat…Legal Aid & Immigration Ser…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr16%42%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%9%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%11%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr16%50%20–35yr13%12%35–55yr16%4%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/54
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,511

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/47
Grantees still filing
37/47
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ALIVE AND WELL COMMUNITIES — $332,580 · OtherALIVE AND WELL COMMUNITIESCIVIC LLC — $325,000 · OtherCIVIC LLCCHEROKEE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT — $299,978 · OtherCHEROKEE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTGeorgia Department of Human Resources DFCS — $250,000 · OtherGeorgia Department of Human Resources DFCSWESTED — $108,082 · OtherWESTEDMASSACHUSETTS DEPT OF ELEMENTARY & SECONDARY EDUCATION — $100,000 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS DEPT OF ELEMENTARY & SECONDARY…Weld County School District 6 — $100,000 · OtherWeld County School District 6+10 more — $257,000 · Other+10 moreBetter Together Central Oregon — $303,764 · Human ServicesBetter Together Ce…ADELANTE MUJERES — $247,652 · Human ServicesADELANTE MUJERESProyecto Pastoral — $112,000 · Human ServicesProyecto Pastoral+5 more — $92,000 · Human Services+5 moreTHE STATEN ISLAND PARTNERSHIP FOR COMMUNITY WELLNESS INC — $336,000 · HealthTHE STATEN ISLAND …MANAGED ACCESS TO CHILD HEALTH INC D/B/A PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILD HEALTH — $324,999 · HealthMANAGED ACCESS TO …CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC — $63,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S INSTITU…LET'S GET READY INC — $50,000 · EducationLET'S GET REA…NATIONAL COLLEGE ADVISING CORPS INC — $50,000 · EducationNATIONAL COLL…COLLEGE POSSIBLE INC — $50,000 · EducationCOLLEGE POSSI…COLLEGE SUMMIT INC — $50,000 · EducationCOLLEGE SUMMI…ORLANDO COMMUNITY & YOUTH TRUST INC — $50,000 · EducationORLANDO COMMU…10000 DEGREES — $50,000 · Education10000 DEGREESBEYOND 12 EDUCATION INC — $50,000 · EducationBEYOND 12 EDU…ONE MILLION DEGREES — $50,000 · EducationONE MILLION D…NASHVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $30,000 · EducationNASHVILLE PUB…SPARTANBURG ACADEMIC MOVEMENT — $30,000 · EducationSPARTANBURG A…NISWONGER FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · EducationRURAL SCHOOLS INNOVATION ZONE — $20,000 · EducationTRI-COUNTY CRADLE TO CAREER COLLABORATIVE — $20,000 · EducationScholarCHIPS Inc — $20,000 · EducationKINEXUS YOUTH SOLUTIONS — $260,800 · EmploymentJUMA VENTURES INC — $20,000 · EmploymentCAPITAL WORKFORCE PARTNERS INC — $20,000 · EmploymentMinnesota Alliance With Youth — $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentONEGOAL — $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentIMENTOR INC — $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentKNOW2 — $26,000 · Youth DevelopmentCONSERVATION LEGACY — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentKALAMAZOO YOUTH DEVELOPMENT NETWORK — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BRANDLAB — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentUNITED WAY OF NORTH CENTRAL NEW MEXICO — $125,000 · PhilanthropyTHE PITTSBURGH PROMISE FOUNDATION — $20,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,772,640Human Services$755,416Health$723,999Education$540,000Employment$300,800Youth Development$276,000Philanthropy$145,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE STATEN ISLAND PARTNERSHIP FOR COMMUNITY WELLNESS INC — $336,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetALIVE AND WELL COMMUNITIES — $332,580 over 3y, 22% of budgetMANAGED ACCESS TO CHILD HEALTH INC D/B/A PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILD HEALTH — $324,999 over 2y, 10% of budgetBetter Together Central Oregon — $303,764 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetKINEXUS YOUTH SOLUTIONS — $260,800 over 2y, 8.0% of budgetADELANTE MUJERES — $247,652 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTH CENTRAL NEW MEXICO — $125,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetProyecto Pastoral — $112,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetMinnesota Alliance With Youth — $100,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC — $63,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetLET'S GET READY INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetNATIONAL COLLEGE ADVISING CORPS INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOLLEGE POSSIBLE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetONEGOAL — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOLLEGE SUMMIT INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetORLANDO COMMUNITY & YOUTH TRUST INC — $50,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budget10000 DEGREES — $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBEYOND 12 EDUCATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE BOTTOM LINE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetIMENTOR INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetONE MILLION DEGREES — $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetRENNIE CENTER FOR EDUCATION RESEARCH & POLICY INC — $37,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetNASHVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetParents for Public Schools of San Francisco — $30,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetSPARTANBURG ACADEMIC MOVEMENT — $30,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetKNOW2 — $26,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetCOMMUNITY SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONSERVATION LEGACY — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEVERGREEN GOODWILL OF NORTHWEST WASHINGTON — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUMA VENTURES INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCENTRAL GEORGIA TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetTHRIVE CHICAGO NFP — $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRURAL SCHOOLS INNOVATION ZONE — $20,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN SEATTLE — $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHINK OF US — $20,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetGREATER STARK COUNTY URBAN LEAGUE INC — $20,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTRI-COUNTY CRADLE TO CAREER COLLABORATIVE — $20,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetTHE PITTSBURGH PROMISE FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTree Trust — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKALAMAZOO YOUTH DEVELOPMENT NETWORK — $20,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCAPITAL WORKFORCE PARTNERS INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMULTI-AGENCY ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN INC — $12,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BRANDLAB — $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

StriveTogether IncOH19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: StriveTogether Inc · Gates Foundation · Ecmc Foundation · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Michael & Susan Dell Foundation · Raikes Foundation · Carnegie Corporation of New York · AT&T Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Truist Foundation Inc · New Venture Fund · The Minneapolis Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization America's Promise the Alliance for Youth funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 31%
  • Capital Workforce Partners Inc86% of income from government
  • Adelante Mujeres31% of income from government
  • Managed Access to Child Health Inc D/B/a Partnership for Child Health13% of income from government
  • The Bottom Line Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph