· Public charity
America's Promise the Alliance for Youth
Over the last 25 years, america's promise alliance has worked to align and amplify the efforts of individual organizations and institutions around big national goals, achieving outcomes at national scale in civic engagement, education, and workforce development.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BEYOND 12 EDUCATION INC | $50,000 |
| PEERFORWARD | $50,000 |
| LET'S GET READY INC | $50,000 |
| ONE MILLION DEGREES | $50,000 |
| NATIONAL COLLEGE ADVISING CORPS INC | $50,000 |
| THE BOTTOM LINE INC | $50,000 |
| ONEGOAL | $50,000 |
| IMENTOR INCORPORATED | $50,000 |
| COLLEGE POSSIBLE | $50,000 |
| 10000 DEGREES | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $755k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
11 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TSTHE STATEN ISLAND PARTNERSHIP FOR COMMUNITY WELLNESS INC3× · 2018–2021 · $336k · revenue +4%
- MAMANAGED ACCESS TO CHILD HEALTH INC D/B/A PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILD HEALTH2× · 2018–2021 · $325k · revenue +130%
- BTBetter Together Central Oregon2× · 2018–2019 · $304k · revenue ×12
Funded once
- CLCIVIC LLCone grant, 2017 · $325k
- CCCHEROKEE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICTone grant, 2018 · $300k
- GDGeorgia Department of Human Resources DFCSone grant, 2018 · $250k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Cincinnati Youth Collaborative ("CYC") empowers young people to overcome barriers and excel in education, career, and life.
The opportunity network ignites the drive, curiosity, and agency of underrepresented students on their paths to and through college and into thriving careers, powered by our commitment to access and community.
The partnership empowers students with quality educational programs, resources and counseling that will make them confident, knowledgeable and help them finish college and contribute to san antonio's future, making the students san…
Equal opportunity schools' mission is to strengthen educator and system leader capacity to break down barriers to increase access, belonging, and success in rigorous college and career-prep secondary school courses for students of color…
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
In collaboration with community partners, project grad akron will provide a system of programs, supports, and scholarships for underrepresented students to achieve success from pre-kindergarten through career.
To create and inspire better ways to give every student an educational foundation for lifelong success. we imagine a world where every student attends a school that meets them where they are, adapts to the unique ways they learn, and…
In fiscal year 2025, the agency operated an americorps maker fellowship, placing 7 americorps vista members at 6 different education focused organizations in ca, ma, and ny. americorps members worked on capacity building projects to expand…
Apie provides college and career readiness support through individualized academic and mentoring programs to prepare students for success.
Children's institute's mission is to leverage research, practice, policy, and advocacy to shift systems toward justice for families so that all of oregon's children, prenatal to grade 5, have access to opportunity.
Utah's promise (up) is committed to 100% of kids and families thriving. we unify leaders, partners, communities and systems to achieve that promise.
The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is College Summit Inc and the most unlike its peers is Niswonger Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE STATEN ISLAND PARTNERSHIP FOR COMMUNITY WELLNESS INC ↗
- Who funds ALIVE AND WELL COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds MANAGED ACCESS TO CHILD HEALTH INC D/B/A PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILD HEALTH ↗
- Who funds Better Together Central Oregon ↗
- Who funds KINEXUS YOUTH SOLUTIONS ↗
- Who funds ADELANTE MUJERES ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTH CENTRAL NEW MEXICO ↗
- Who funds Proyecto Pastoral ↗
- Who funds Minnesota Alliance With Youth ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds LET'S GET READY INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL COLLEGE ADVISING CORPS INC ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE POSSIBLE INC ↗
- Who funds ONEGOAL ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE SUMMIT INC ↗
- Who funds ORLANDO COMMUNITY & YOUTH TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds 10000 DEGREES ↗
- Who funds BEYOND 12 EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE BOTTOM LINE INC ↗
- Who funds IMENTOR INC ↗
- Who funds ONE MILLION DEGREES ↗
- Who funds RENNIE CENTER FOR EDUCATION RESEARCH & POLICY INC ↗
- Who funds NASHVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Parents for Public Schools of San Francisco ↗
- Who funds SPARTANBURG ACADEMIC MOVEMENT ↗
- Who funds KNOW2 ↗
- Who funds SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds CONSERVATION LEGACY ↗
- Who funds EVERGREEN GOODWILL OF NORTHWEST WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds JUMA VENTURES INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL GEORGIA TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THRIVE CHICAGO NFP ↗
- Who funds NISWONGER FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: StriveTogether Inc · Gates Foundation · Ecmc Foundation · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Michael & Susan Dell Foundation · Raikes Foundation · Carnegie Corporation of New York · AT&T Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Truist Foundation Inc · New Venture Fund · The Minneapolis Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization America's Promise the Alliance for Youth funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Capital Workforce Partners Inc — 86% of income from government
- Adelante Mujeres — 31% of income from government
- Managed Access to Child Health Inc D/B/a Partnership for Child Health — 13% of income from government
- The Bottom Line Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.