Skip to content
Allosource at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, Allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

$262k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$14MEducation$281kRecreation & Sports$78kScience & Tech$63kAnimals$20kInternational$15kCivil Rights$5k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $196,050, the rows itemized in this filing. The $262,167 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $66,117 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $79k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$150M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Phoenix Society$100,000
Donate Life New York State$35,000
Limb Preservation Foundation$33,600
Network of Hope$10,000
Donor Alliance Inc$6,810
Arrupe Coporate Work Study Program$5,640
Chicago Sports Summit Foundation$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MAYO CLINIC: $50k → 9%RESURGE INTERNATIONAL: $15k → 8%JOHN BROCKINGTON FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%Donate Life New York State: $35k → 11%UPSTATE NEW YORK TRANSPLANT SERVICES: $1.2M → 13%TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA: $15k → 17%LIFEGIFT: $218k → 16%IOWA DONOR NETWORK: $824k → 15%THE PHOENIX SOCIETY: $332k → 11%MID-AMERICA TRANSPLANT SERVICES: $2.7M → 21%ROCK INC ELITE SPORTS MEDICINE: $50k → 11%Arrupe Coporate Work Study Program: $8k → 12%LIFECENTER ORGAN DONOR NETWORK: $10k → 16%Chicago Sports Summit Foundation: $5k → 14%NUVASIVE CHEETAH GIVES BACK FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%DONATE LIFE NEW YORK STATE: $35k → 11%UPSTATE NEW YORK TRANSPLANT SERVICES: $147k → 13%TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA: $15k → 17%IOWA DONOR NETWORK: $91k → 15%THE PHOENIX SOCIETY: $330k → 11%MID-AMERICA TRANSPLANT: $366k → 21%ROCK INC ELITE SPORTS MEDICINE: $13k → 11%Arrupe Coporate Work Study Program: $6k → 12%LIFECENTER ORGAN DONOR: $10k → 16%NUVASIVE CHEETAH GIVES BACK FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%Donate Life New York State: $35k → 11%THE PHOENIX SOCIETY: $330k → 11%DONOR ALLIANCE: $2.7M → 12%Network of Hope: $10k → 16%Donate Life New York State: $10k → 11%THE PHOENIX SOCIETY: $280k → 11%DONOR ALLIANCE: $298k → 12%The Phoenix Society: $175k → 11%Donor Alliance Inc: $7k → 12%The Phoenix Society: $131k → 11%Donor Alliance Inc: $6k → 12%The Phoenix Society: $100k → 11%NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $17k → 12%THE PHOENIX SOCIETY: $55k → 11%NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $7k → 12%Limb Preservation Foundation: $34k → 12%Limb Preservation Foundation: $30k → 12%Limb Preservation Foundation: $30k → 12%LIMB PRESERVATION FOUNDATION: $25k → 12%LIMB PRESERVATION FOUNDATION: $25k → 12%LIMB PRESERVATION FOUNDATION: $25k → 12%LIMB PRESERVATION FOUNDATION: $24k → 12%THE LIMB PRESERVATION FOUNDATION: $29k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
IA
OH
CT
CA
CO
MO
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of Allosource’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 25% of the giving stays in CO; by stated purpose, 1%.

Allosourcelessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14M · 18 repeat orgs$248k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
3

Total granted

$14M
$238k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+64%

Still filing today

89%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationPhilanthropyInternationalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GO
    GIFT OF HOPE ORGAN & TISSUE DONOR NETWORK
    2× · 2017–2018 · $3.1M · revenue +110%
  • MT
    MID-AMERICA TRANSPLANT SERVICES
    2× · 2017–2018 · $3.0M · revenue +109%
  • DA
    DONOR ALLIANCE INC
    4× · 2017–2024 · $3.0M · revenue +95%

Funded once

  • LO
    LIFEGIFT ORGAN DONATION CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $218k · revenue +67%
  • RI
    RESURGE INTERNATIONALgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +64%
  • JB
    John Brockington Foundation
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue -87%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Midwest Transplant Network Inc

Saving lives by honoring the gift of organ and tissue donation with dignity and compassion.

Health
2
Lifelink Foundation Inc

To honor donors and save lives through organ and tissue donation. (expanded mission on schedule o)

Health
3
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
4
Donorconnect

Background donorconnect, headquartered in the salt lake city area, is a federally designated, nonprofit organ procurement organization (opo) that serves utah, southeastern idaho, western wyoming, and elko, nevada. its service area extends…

Health
5
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
6
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
7
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
8
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
9
Greater Delaware Valley Society of Transplant Surgeons

Gift of life donor program, the tax-exempt non-profit federally designated organization serving the eastern half of pennsylvania, southern new jersey, and delaware, is responsible for recovering and allocating organs and tissues used in…

Health
10
Lehigh Valley Hospital

Our mission is to heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and research.

Health
11
Temple University Hospital Inc

See Schedule OOur mission is to support Temple University and its Health Sciences Center academic programs by providing the clinical environment and service to support the highest quality teaching and training programs for health care…

Health
12
Upmc Group

Healthcare, education, and research

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mid-America Transplant Services; the most unlike its peers is Globus Cares. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
23/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GIFT OF HOPE ORGAN & TISSUE DONOR NETWORK: $3,061,607 · HealthGIFT OF HOPE ORGAN & TISSUE DONOR NETWORKMID-AMERICA TRANSPLANT SERVICES: $3,032,607 · HealthMID-AMERICA TRANSPLANT SERVICESDONOR ALLIANCE INC: $2,981,542 · HealthDONOR ALLIANCE INC+6 more: $753,165 · Health+6 morePHOENIX SOCIETY INC: $1,732,525 · OtherPHOENIX SOCIETY INCUPSTATE NEW YORK TRANSPLANT SERVICES INC: $1,333,649 · OtherUPSTATE NEW YORK TRANSPLANT SERVI…IOWA DONOR NETWORK: $919,529 · OtherIOWA DONOR NETWORKCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY: $204,385 · Other+4 more: $75,840 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $40,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $30,000 · EducationROCKY MOUNTAIN PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE LLC: $10,000 · EducationGLOBUS CARES: $25,000 · PhilanthropyJohn Brockington Foundation: $5,000 · PhilanthropyRESURGE INTERNATIONAL: $15,000 · InternationalCHICAGO SPORTS SUMMIT FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Recreation & Sports
Health$9,828,921Other$4,265,928Education$80,000Philanthropy$30,000International$15,000Recreation & Sports$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGIFT OF HOPE ORGAN & TISSUE DONOR NETWORK: $3,061,607 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetMID-AMERICA TRANSPLANT SERVICES: $3,032,607 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetDONOR ALLIANCE INC: $2,981,542 over 4y, 5.2% of budgetPHOENIX SOCIETY INC: $1,732,525 over 8y, 17% of budgetUPSTATE NEW YORK TRANSPLANT SERVICES INC: $1,333,649 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetIOWA DONOR NETWORK: $919,529 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetLIMB PRESERVATION FOUNDATION: $221,910 over 8y, 8.3% of budgetLIFEGIFT ORGAN DONATION CENTER: $217,925 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNEW YORK ALLIANCE FOR DONATION INC DBA DONATE LIFE NEW YORK STATE: $115,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBUS CARES: $25,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $23,330 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLifeCenter Organ Donor Network: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRESURGE INTERNATIONAL: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHICAGO SPORTS SUMMIT FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetARRUPE CORPORATE WORK STUDY PROGRAM: $13,840 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNETWORK FOR HOPE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PERFORMANCE EXCELLENCE LLC: $10,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetJohn Brockington Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodPaypal Charitable Giv…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Network for GoodDC7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Allosource funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Allosource. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Allosource’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home