· Public charity
Allegro Organizational Solutions Inc
To provide relief and development assistance in difficult and often hostile parts of the world
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 32 grants below total $4,257,356 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $6,246,917 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,989,561 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $40k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $358k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $710k
- $250k+2 grants · $3.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Millennium Relief & Development Svcs Inc | $1,578,853 |
| Linacre | $1,570,000 |
| Good Works Collective | $180,679 |
| The Navigators | $140,000 |
| Arboretum II Inc | $122,000 |
| Frontiers USA | $77,353 |
| Radical Inc | $72,000 |
| Africas Hope International | $60,873 |
| VisionSynergy | $57,588 |
| Global Serve International Inc | $49,000 |
| e3 Partners Ministry | $44,293 |
| SALT Next Gen Ministries | $40,000 |
| Student Mobilization Inc | $29,000 |
| The Center for Mission Mobilization | $22,000 |
| Bridge Builders International | $21,648 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $131k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $1.9M on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 7 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: Relief & Development
Stated purpose: Relief & Development
Stated purpose: Relief & Development
Stated purpose: Relief & Development
Stated purpose: Relief & Development
Stated purpose: Relief & Development
Stated purpose: Relief & Development
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +12% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $331k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LILINACRE INC5× · 2020–2024 · $6.5M · revenue +152% · 91% of their budget
- MRMILLENNIUM RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INC5× · 2020–2024 · $6.5M · revenue +17% · 27% of their budget
- VVISIONSYNERGY4× · 2021–2024 · $239k · revenue +11%
Funded once
- TETEAM EXPANSION MINISTRIES INCone grant, 2022 · $170k
- GIGRACE INTERNATIONAL CHURCHES AND MINISTRIES INCone grant, 2022 · $51k
- RFRIDGECREST FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2023 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Grace Global Ministries exists to assist local churches in sending global workers to fulfill the Great Commission.
Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…
With a desire to see the Gospel proclaimed in all nations, we exist to make and multiply disciples of the next generation through the vehicles of church-planting missions and missional leadership training.
Religious
Reconciliaton Ministries Intl. is a Christian evangelical organization preaching and teaching the Word of God in over 60 countries. The ministry equips and encourages Christians everywhere to be saved, healed, and delivered according to…
Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.
i58 Global is a Christian ministry dedicated to recruiting, sending and organizing relief workers to provide aid and share hope to refugees in various European countries.
To provide strategic teaching about prayer, prophecy, and intercession in the US and abroad. Books, manuals, and audio teachings are also used to equip Christians in strategic level spiritual prayer and warfare.
Global Outreach Mission, Inc. is an inter-denominational foreign and domestic ministry organization that is engaged in a wide variety of ministries, including church planting, Christian camps, personal work, literature, community…
Our vision is to catalyze a Disciple Making Movement that will bless every church and every People, teaching others who will impact others for time and eternity.
To share Christian compassion and love in an effort to alleviate spiritual, physical, emotional and mental suffering around the world. We help care for orphans and vulnerable children, teens and women in need. We provide training and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Global Generosity Inc and the most unlike its peers is Arboretum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LINACRE INC ↗
- Who funds MILLENNIUM RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Good Works Collective ↗
- Who funds VISIONSYNERGY ↗
- Who funds ARBORETUM INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL FELLOWSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds Global Generosity Inc ↗
- Who funds MIO Frontiers ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL SERVE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds Radical Inc ↗
- Who funds E3 Partners Ministry ↗
- Who funds BIGBIGHOUSE & CO ↗
- Who funds SALT NEXT GEN MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds YOUTH WITH A MISSION - SAN DIEGOBAJA ↗
- Who funds SRV Inc ↗
- Who funds The New Horizons Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Ben Lim Ministries ↗
- Who funds Mukti International ↗
- Who funds Entrusted Houston ↗
- Who funds BRIDGE BUILDERS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds RADIUS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds MISSION QUEST ↗
- Who funds GREATER EUROPE MISSION ↗
- Who funds Axia International ↗
- Who funds Restoring the Soul Inc ↗
- Who funds HOPING HEARTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FORNGO INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Christian Community Foundation Inc · The Bolick Foundation · Christian Community Foundation of Memphis · G II Charities · International Generosity Foundation Trust · Tyndale House Ministries · The Maclellan Foundation Inc · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Millennium Relief and Development Services Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Allegro Organizational Solutions Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Allegro Organizational Solutions Inc?
Find your warmest path to Allegro Organizational Solutions Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.