Skip to content
Allegro Organizational Solutions Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Allegro Organizational Solutions Inc

To provide relief and development assistance in difficult and often hostile parts of the world

$6.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
32
Grants FY2024still arriving
17
States reached
$1.6M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

International$14MReligion$429kEmployment$281kHuman Services$253kPublic Safety & Disaster$221kEnvironment$140kPhilanthropy$5k
02FY2024 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 32 grants below total $4,257,356, the rows itemized in this filing. The $6,246,917 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,989,561 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $358k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $710k
  • $250k+2 grants · $3.1M
$17,500
Median grant
17
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Millennium Relief & Development Svcs Inc$1,578,853
Linacre$1,570,000
Good Works Collective$180,679
The Navigators$140,000
Arboretum II Inc$122,000
Frontiers USA$77,353
Radical Inc$72,000
Africas Hope International$60,873
VisionSynergy$57,588
Global Serve International Inc$49,000
e3 Partners Ministry$44,293
SALT Next Gen Ministries$40,000
Student Mobilization Inc$29,000
The Center for Mission Mobilization$22,000
Bridge Builders International$21,648
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $131k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Saint Joseph's House Inc: $8k → 6%Ben Lim Ministries: $30k → 14%Big Big House & Co: $13k → 10%IMPACT Indonesia Inc: $10k → 6%Hoping Hearts Foundation Inc: $15k → 6%Big Big House & Co: $11k → 10%Big Big House & Co: $10k → 10%Big Big House & Co: $10k → 10%Entrusted Houston: $15k → 16%Entrusted Houston: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
MI
NV
OH
PA
CA
CO
MO
KY
MD
AZ
AR
TN
NC
SC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $1.9M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 7 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Middle East and North Africa$696k · 37% · 9 grants

Stated purpose: Relief & Development

Sub-Saharan Africa$498k · 27% · 12 grants

Stated purpose: Relief & Development

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$185k · 10% · 9 grants

Stated purpose: Relief & Development

East Asia and the Pacific$176k · 10% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: Relief & Development

North America (Canada and Mexico)$143k · 8% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: Relief & Development

South Asia$100k · 5% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: Relief & Development

South America$57k · 3% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: Relief & Development

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$15M · 18 repeat orgs$862k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
22

Total granted

$15M
$530k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
0%

Still filing today

56%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $331k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionInternationalHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LI
    LINACRE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $6.5M · revenue +152% · 91% of their budget
  • MR
    MILLENNIUM RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $6.5M · revenue +17% · 27% of their budget
  • V
    VISIONSYNERGY
    4× · 2021–2024 · $239k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • TE
    TEAM EXPANSION MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2022 · $170k
  • GI
    GRACE INTERNATIONAL CHURCHES AND MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2022 · $51k
  • RF
    RIDGECREST FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Grace Global Ministries Inc

Grace Global Ministries exists to assist local churches in sending global workers to fulfill the Great Commission.

International
2
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
3
Next Worldwide Inc

With a desire to see the Gospel proclaimed in all nations, we exist to make and multiply disciples of the next generation through the vehicles of church-planting missions and missional leadership training.

—
4
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
5
I58 Global

i58 Global is a Christian ministry dedicated to recruiting, sending and organizing relief workers to provide aid and share hope to refugees in various European countries.

Human Services
6
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
7
Global Outreach Mission Inc

Global Outreach Mission, Inc. is an inter-denominational foreign and domestic ministry organization that is engaged in a wide variety of ministries, including church planting, Christian camps, personal work, literature, community…

Religion
8
Reconciliation Ministries International Inc

Reconciliaton Ministries Intl. is a Christian evangelical organization preaching and teaching the Word of God in over 60 countries. The ministry equips and encourages Christians everywhere to be saved, healed, and delivered according to…

Religion
9
Serving Beyond Borders

Serving and pastoring overseas workers on their own turf and equipping nationals by training and empowering them in their work of advancing the gospel.

Human Services
10
Christian Harvest International Min

To provide strategic teaching about prayer, prophecy, and intercession in the US and abroad. Books, manuals, and audio teachings are also used to equip Christians in strategic level spiritual prayer and warfare.

Religion
11
Mission Without Borders Incorporated

Mission Without Borders (MWB) is dedicated to reaching people for Christ through an international network of Christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,…

International
12
Global Outreach Inc

To share Christian compassion and love in an effort to alleviate spiritual, physical, emotional and mental suffering around the world. We help care for orphans and vulnerable children, teens and women in need. We provide training and…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Global Generosity Inc; the most unlike its peers is Arboretum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/38
Grantees still filing
20/38
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LINACRE INC: $6,511,000 · InternationalLINACRE INCMILLENNIUM RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INC: $6,464,506 · InternationalMILLENNIUM RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INC+6 more: $325,084 · InternationalTHE NAVIGATORS: $375,600 · OtherTEAM EXPANSION MINISTRIES INC: $170,000 · OtherARBORETUM INC: $140,000 · OtherAFRICA INLAND MISSION INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED: $60,873 · OtherGRACE INTERNATIONAL CHURCHES AND MINISTRIES INC: $51,294 · OtherRIDGECREST FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · OtherCENTRAL ASIA LEADERSHIP LEGACY: $40,687 · Other+14 more: $202,844 · OtherGLOBAL FELLOWSHIP INC: $121,123 · ReligionMIO Frontiers: $90,314 · ReligionGLOBAL SERVE INTERNATIONAL INC: $75,000 · ReligionRadical Inc: $72,000 · ReligionE3 Partners Ministry: $70,293 · ReligionSALT NEXT GEN MINISTRIES: $40,000 · ReligionYOUTH WITH A MISSION - SAN DIEGOBAJA: $36,300 · ReligionBRIDGE BUILDERS INTERNATIONAL: $21,648 · Religion+6 more: $68,873 · ReligionGood Works Collective: $280,679 · EmploymentGlobal Generosity Inc: $97,980 · PhilanthropyThe New Horizons Foundation Inc: $34,951 · PhilanthropyAxia International: $16,596 · PhilanthropyWATERSTONE SUPPORT FOUNDATION INC: $5,281 · PhilanthropyBIGBIGHOUSE & CO: $43,228 · Human ServicesBen Lim Ministries: $29,795 · Human ServicesEntrusted Houston: $25,000 · Human ServicesHOPING HEARTS FOUNDATION INC: $15,414 · Human ServicesIMPACT INDONESIA INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesKaty Christian Ministries: $10,000 · Human ServicesSt Josephs House Inc: $7,900 · Human ServicesMISSION QUEST: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentFORNGO INC: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentMukti International: $28,050 · Crime & Legal
International$13,300,590Other$1,091,298Religion$595,551Employment$280,679Philanthropy$154,808Human Services$141,337Youth Development$35,000Crime & Legal$28,050

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLINACRE INC: $6,511,000 over 5y, 91% of budgetMILLENNIUM RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INC: $6,464,506 over 5y, 27% of budgetGood Works Collective: $280,679 over 2y, 21% of budgetVISIONSYNERGY: $238,890 over 4y, 6.9% of budgetARBORETUM INC: $140,000 over 2y, 94% of budgetGlobal Generosity Inc: $97,980 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetGLOBAL SERVE INTERNATIONAL INC: $75,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetE3 Partners Ministry: $70,293 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBIGBIGHOUSE & CO: $43,228 over 4y, 13% of budgetSALT NEXT GEN MINISTRIES: $40,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetSRV Inc: $35,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetThe New Horizons Foundation Inc: $34,951 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBen Lim Ministries: $29,795 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetMukti International: $28,050 over 1y, 17% of budgetEntrusted Houston: $25,000 over 2y, 8.2% of budgetBRIDGE BUILDERS INTERNATIONAL: $21,648 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetRADIUS INTERNATIONAL: $20,614 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMISSION QUEST: $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGREATER EUROPE MISSION: $19,273 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAxia International: $16,596 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRestoring the Soul Inc: $15,600 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHOPING HEARTS FOUNDATION INC: $15,414 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFORNGO INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAmazima Ministries International Education and Empowerment for East: $11,080 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDevelopment Assoc International: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetIMPACT INDONESIA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetGOD'S ECONOMY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetKaty Christian Ministries: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONVOY OF HOPE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEURO RELIEF USA: $9,500 over 1y, 12% of budgetSower of Seeds International Ministries: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSt Josephs House Inc: $7,900 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetFriends of Agape: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWATERSTONE SUPPORT FOUNDATION INC: $5,281 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationThe Signatry Charitab…Christian Community F…The Bolick FoundationChristian Community F…G II CharitiesInternational Generos…Tyndale House Ministr…The Maclellan Foundat…The US Charitable Gif…Natl Christian Charit…Millennium Relief and…
Servant FoundationKS25.8× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Christian Community Foundation Inc · The Bolick Foundation · Christian Community Foundation of Memphis · G II Charities · International Generosity Foundation Trust · Tyndale House Ministries · The Maclellan Foundation Inc · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Millennium Relief and Development Services Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Allegro Organizational Solutions Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Allegro Organizational Solutions Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Allegro Organizational Solutions Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Allegro Organizational Solutions Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Allegro Organizational Solutions’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home