How much did ALL STARS HELPING KIDS INC grant in FY2024?

Philanthropy$2.1MEducation$862kArts & Culture$173kYouth Development$168kRecreation & Sports$162kHuman Services$131kHealth$95kEmployment$92kPublic Benefit$53kOther$188k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

distributionstotaled millionucsfucsf'sdiscoveriesdonorstop

2020

childpostsecondarycreatingoakland lacrosseaccomplishscholarshipsculture

2021

usclearningexcellenceknowledgeothersnationalumni

2022

ucsf benioffbenioff children'saccessmiddlecompetitiveoakland genesissoccer programming

2024

supportsstudent-athleteshealthyfeelcharactercivicfinancial literacy

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

$10k–50k8 grants · $218k
$50k–250k4 grants · $212k
$250k+1 grant · $1.9M

$34,807

Median grant

States reached

Total assets

Largest grants

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC (DBA DAFGIVING360)$1,947,922
DEVELOP FOR GOOD$53,000
STUDENT PROGRAM FOR ACADEMIC ATHLETIC TRANSITIONING$53,000
GIVE THX INC$53,000
MEWATER FOUNDATION INC$53,000
CAREER GIRLS$40,700
URBAN ED ACADEMY INC$34,807
PUT ME IN INC$26,500
OAKLAND GENESIS SOCCER$26,500
THE AUDACITY PERFORMING ARTS PROJECT$26,500
REPRESENTED LEADERSHIP INC$26,500
POSITIVE ALTERNATIVE RECREATION TEAMBUILDING IMPACT$22,346
THE MARCUS ALLEN FOUNDATION$14,138

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $131k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 10%. 31% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

39%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.6M · 27 repeat orgs$2.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

27 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.6M

$239k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%

+22%

Still filing today

100%

74%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 8% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.2M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

UE
URBAN ED ACADEMY INC
4× · 2018–2024 · $114k · revenue +260%
TI
TEAM INC (TECH EXPOSURE ACCESS THROUGH MENTORING INC)
3× · 2019–2021 · $92k · revenue +189% · 28% of their budget
C5
CHAPTER 510
4× · 2018–2022 · $85k · revenue +6%

Funded once

LS
LAUREUS SPORT FOR GOOD FOUNDATION USAgraduated
one grant, 2019 · $40k · revenue +103%
HF
HOLLYROD FOUNDATION
one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue -16%
ML
MATT LEINART FOUNDATION
one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue -88%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Unitedly

Unitedly is a nonprofit organization based in San Mateo County, California. Unitedly was established to ensure Asian families and communities have access to equitable opportunities and resources to thrive in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Human Services

Oakland Kids First

Oakland Kids First is a community-based nonprofit in Oakland, CA that empowers young people to reimagine broken systems and organize for equitable public schools by providing youth leadership development, youth organizing, and community…

Youth Development

California Competes

California Competes: Higher Education for a Strong Economy is a nonpartisan policy and research organization focused on identifying solutions to the states most critical challenges at the intersection of higher education, equity, and the…

Education

San Francisco Girls' School

to educate and inspire girls to become innovators and leaders in stem.

—

Techbridge Girls

Techbridge Girls re-engineers the way BIPOC girls* from marginalized communities experience STEM by catalyzing out-of- school time STEM educators and STEM professionals into equity educators and advo- cates through training and curricula…

Education

California School-Age Consortium Inc

The California School-Age Consortium (CalSAC) builds professional networks that provide training, leadership development and advocacy to ensure that all young people have access to high quality out-of-school time programs and to create a…

—

Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment

Silicon Schools Fund Inc

Support the launch of excellent new schools and innovative practices that improve education.

Education

California Forward

California forward (ca fwd) brings people together across regions to improve government and create resilient growth statewide.

Public Benefit

Breakthrough Silicon Valley

To prepare academically motivated students with limited educational opportunities for success in rigorous college-preparatory high school programs and entry into four-year colleges and prepare high school and college students to enter…

Education

Bay Area Creative Foundation

The Bay Area Creative Foundation celebrates, cultivates, and inspires creativity in youth and young adults. We believe in fostering a society that embodies creative spirit, art, and innovation.

Arts & Culture

Alameda Education Foundation

AEF serves as a critical bridge toward equitable and inclusive educational outcomes for Alameda TK-12 public school students.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Basic Fund and the most unlike its peers is Matt Leinart Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

3/65

the rest of the field

11%

11,761/103,570

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

62 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

59/62

Grantees still filing

42/62

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Philanthropy$2,074,781Education$862,007Other$427,000Arts & Culture$172,645Youth Development$167,846Recreation & Sports$161,500Human Services$131,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA32.9× affinity28 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Tides Foundation · The Barrios Trust · Olympic Club Foundation · McNabb Foundation · Mitchell Kapor Foundation · Tipping Point Community · The California Wellness Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation ALL STARS HELPING KIDS INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: TEAM INC (TECH EXPOSURE ACCESS THROUGH MENTORING INC).

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~0 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.9× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 813838152 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on TEAM INC (TECH EXPOSURE ACCESS THROUGH MENTORING INC), cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 0 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 28% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to All Stars Helping Kids Inc?

Find your warmest path to All Stars Helping Kids Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

ALL STARS HELPING KIDS INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

62 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to All Stars Helping Kids Inc?

More from the funding graph

ALL STARS HELPING KIDS INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

62 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to All Stars Helping Kids Inc?

More from the funding graph