Skip to content
All-In to Fight Cancer at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

All-In to Fight Cancer

The mission of ALL-IN TO FIGHT CANCER is to raise funding to assist our beneficiary organizations who treat and care for cancer patients of all ages, conduct critical cancer research and assist families and survivors affected by cancer within the charlotte, north carolina community.

$110k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$772kPhilanthropy$5k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $105,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $110,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $5,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$106k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GO JEN GO$25,000
ATRIUM HEALTH$25,000
PAULA TAKACS FOUNDATION$25,000
CANCER SERVICES$15,000
COMPASS TO CARE$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 11% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ISABELLA SANTOS FOUNDATION: $45k → 7%NOVANT HEALTH: $20k → 10%CANCER SERVICES: $25k → 15%COMPASS TO CARE: $15k → 14%ISABELLA SANTOS FOUNDATION: $45k → 7%CHEMO CARS: $70k → 10%CANCER SERVICES: $15k → 15%ISABELLA SANTOS FOUNDATION: $44k → 7%CHEMO CARS: $25k → 10%PAULA TAKACS FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%PAULA TAKACS FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%24 HOURS OF BOOTY: $10k → 10%SWIM ACROSS AMERICA INC: $5k → 10%GO JEN GO: $45k → 10%GO JEN GO: $44k → 10%GO JEN GO: $25k → 10%ATRIUM HEALTH: $25k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$602k · 6 repeat orgs$175k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +77% since the first grant, against +35% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$602k
$135k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
+35%

Still filing today

100%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’23’24
HealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TI
    The Isabella Santos Foundation
    3× · 2017–2019 · $134k · revenue +77%
  • GJ
    Go Jen Go Foundation Inc
    3× · 2017–2024 · $114k · revenue +247%
  • TP
    The Paula Takacs Foundation For Sarcoma Research
    3× · 2018–2024 · $70k · revenue +118%

Funded once

  • PT
    PAULA TAKACS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $25k
  • GJ
    GO JEN GO
    2× · 2022–2023 · $25k
  • HF
    HELENE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Presbyterian Hospital

In the spirit of keeping our focus on patient-centered, equitable and compassionate care while ensuring our organization is sustainable for future generations, we have restated our mission, vision and values and are now guided by our…

Health
2
Carolinas Center for Medical Excellence Found ation
Health
3
Carolina Medicorp Enterprises Inc

Mission novant health exists to improve the health of our communities, one person at a time. vision we, the novant health team, will deliver the most remarkable patient experience, in every dimension, every time. values -compassion: we…

—
4
Forsyth Medical Center Foundation

In the spirit of keeping our focus on patient-centered, equitable and compassionate care while ensuring our organization is sustainable for future generations, we have restated our mission, vision and values and are now guided by our…

Health
5
Access to Cancer Care Foundation
—
6
Forsyth Memorial Hospital Inc

In the spirit of keeping our focus on patient-centered, equitable and compassionate care while ensuring our organization is sustainable for future generations, we have restated our mission, vision and values and are now guided by our…

Health
7
Community General Hospital Foundation Inc

In the spirit of keeping our focus on patient-centered, equitable and compassionate care while ensuring our organization is sustainable for future generations, we have restated our mission, vision and values and are now guided by our…

Health
8
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
9
Nhrmc Home Care

In the spirit of keeping our focus on patient-centered, equitable and compassionate care while ensuring our organization is sustainable for future generations, we have restated our mission, vision and values and are now guided by our…

Health
10
Novant Medical Group Inc

Our cause we create a healthier future and bring remarkable experiences to life. discover we consistently seek to innovate, courageously transform ourselves and find new ways to add value for our patients, communities and one another.…

—
11
The Nebraska Medical Center

The Nebraska Medical Center (TNMC)'s mission is to lead the world in transforming lives to create a healthy future for individuals and communities through premier educational programs, innovative research, and extraordinary patient care.

Health
12
New Hanover Regional Medical Center Foundation Inc

In the spirit of keeping our focus on patient-centered, equitable and compassionate care while ensuring our organization is sustainable for future generations, we have restated our mission, vision and values and are now guided by our…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cancer Services Inc; the most unlike its peers is Atrium Health Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $150,000 · HealthPRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONThe Isabella Santos Foundation: $133,530 · HealthThe Isabella Santos FoundationGo Jen Go Foundation Inc: $113,750 · HealthGo Jen Go Foundation IncChemoCars Inc: $94,698 · HealthChemoCars IncThe Paula Takacs Foundation For Sarcoma Research: $70,000 · HealthThe Paula Takacs Foundation For Sarcoma ResearchCANCER SERVICES INC: $40,000 · HealthCANCER SERVICES INCATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Health+4 more: $55,000 · Health+4 morePAULA TAKACS FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherPAULA TAKACS …GO JEN GO: $25,000 · OtherGO JEN GOHELENE FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherHELENE FOUNDA…LUNG CANCER INITIATIVE: $20,000 · OtherLUNG CANCER I…Swim Across America Inc: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Health$681,978Other$90,000Philanthropy$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetThe Isabella Santos Foundation: $133,530 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetGo Jen Go Foundation Inc: $113,750 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetChemoCars Inc: $94,698 over 2y, 26% of budgetThe Paula Takacs Foundation For Sarcoma Research: $70,000 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetCANCER SERVICES INC: $40,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNOVANT HEALTH INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPASS TO CARE: $15,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budget24 Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSwim Across America Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation for the Ca…Duke Energy FoundationThe Pfizer Foundation…The Bank of America C…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Blackbaud Giving …American Online Givin…Natl Christian Charit…Paypal Charitable Giv…Network for GoodNational Philanthropi…Fidelity Investments …
Foundation for the CarolinasNC14.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation for the Carolinas · Duke Energy Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization All-In to Fight Cancer funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from All-In to Fight Cancer. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to All-In to Fight Cancer?

    Find your warmest path to All-In to Fight Cancer through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on All-In to Fight Cancer’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home