Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Alex Hemby Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$174k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$1.3MReligion$138kEducation$107kHuman Services$24kFood & Nutrition$23kRecreation & Sports$10kHousing & Shelter$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $125k
$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ATRIUM HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$125,000
NOVANT HEALTH PRESBYTERIAN MED CTR$30,000
MYERS PARK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$10,000
THE FLETCHER SCHOOL$2,500
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$2,500
THOMPSON CHILD & FAMILY FOCUS$2,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 52% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 7%MISTY MEADOWS MITEY RIDERS: $3k → 7%MISTY MEADOWS MITEY RIDERS: $3k → 7%CRISIS ASSISTANCE MINISTRY: $5k → 10%BEDS FOR KIDS: $500 → 10%BEDS FOR KIDS: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.5M · 13 repeat orgs$165k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
9

Total granted

$1.5M
$135k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-6%
+60%

Still filing today

38%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    ATRIUM HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $920k
  • NH
    NOVANT HEALTH FOUNDATION
    2× · 2019–2020 · $200k
  • PC
    PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH USA
    8× · 2017–2025 · $138k

Funded once

  • PH
    PRESBYTERIAN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $75k
  • AH
    ATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $19k · revenue +195%
  • YG
    Youth Golf Foundation of the Carolinasgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +60%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Home Society of North Carolina Inc

The Children's Home Society of North Carolina's mission is to promote the right of every child to a permanent, safe, and loving family.

Human Services
2
Charlotte Family Housing

The mission of Charlotte Family Housing is to empower working families experiencing homelessness to achieve long-term self-sufficiency through shelter, housing, supportive services, and advocacy.

Human Services
3
For Charlotte Inc

To unite the Church to transform the city through the power of the Gospel.

Religion
4
Carolina Family Connections

Recruit and train and license foster parents to receive foster children from county government agencies.

Human Services
5
The Children's Place Inc

Provide mental health services to promote resiliency, wellness and positive developmental outcomes through prevention, treatment, education and family support for children under the age of 9 who have experienced abuse, neglect and other…

Crime & Legal
6
Kids Home Care Inc

The corporation is organized for charitable, educational, and scientific purposes, and to provide pediatric home health care, alternate site and other pediatric services to pediatric patients. in addition, kids home care conducts health…

Health
7
Children's Trust of South Carolina

To strengthen families, organizations, and communities to prevent child abuse and neglect.

Human Services
8
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Inc

To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.

Health
9
Carolina Children's Charity Inc

To provide support to lowcountry children with birth defects and/or childhood diseases.

Health
10
Baptist Children's Homes of North Carolina Incorporated

Baptist children's homes of north carolina (bch) is a nonprofit organization that reaches out to children and families in crisis. the agency's mission statement is "sharing hope...changing lives."

Religion
11
UrbanPromise Charlotte

Provide Charlotte's low-income children and youth with the academic, spiritual, and social development necessary to become Christian leaders determined to restore their communities.

Youth Development
12
Charlotte Country Day School

Through excellence in education, charlotte country day school develops the potential of each student by fostering intellectual curiosity, principled character, ethical leadership and a responsibility to serve. the key values and…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atrium Health Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Thompson Child & Family Focus Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ATRIUM HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION — $920,000 · OtherATRIUM HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONNOVANT HEALTH FOUNDATION — $200,000 · OtherNOVANT HEALTH FOUNDATIONPRESBYTERIAN CHURCH USA — $138,000 · OtherPRESBYTERIAN CHURCH USANOVANT HEALTH HEMBY — $87,000 · OtherNOVANT HEALTH HEMBYPRESBYTERIAN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION — $75,000 · Other+12 more — $97,500 · Other+12 moreQueens University of Charlotte — $90,000 · EducationATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION — $19,000 · HealthMISTY MEADOWS MITEY RIDERS INC — $5,500 · Human ServicesCrisis Assistance Ministry — $5,000 · Human ServicesBEDS FOR KIDS INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesYouth Golf Foundation of the Carolinas — $10,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,517,500Education$90,000Health$19,000Human Services$11,500Recreation & Sports$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetQueens University of Charlotte — $90,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMPSON CHILD & FAMILY FOCUS INC — $12,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetYouth Golf Foundation of the Carolinas — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMISTY MEADOWS MITEY RIDERS INC — $5,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCrisis Assistance Ministry — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FLETCHER SCHOOL INC — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetA CHILD'S PLACE OF CHARLOTTE INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBEDS FOR KIDS INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Queens University of Charlotte
  • Who funds ATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THOMPSON CHILD & FAMILY FOCUS INC
  • Who funds Youth Golf Foundation of the Carolinas
  • Who funds MISTY MEADOWS MITEY RIDERS INC
  • Who funds Crisis Assistance Ministry
  • Who funds THE FLETCHER SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds A CHILD'S PLACE OF CHARLOTTE INC
  • Who funds BEDS FOR KIDS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation for the CarolinasNC17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation for the Carolinas · United Way Worldwide · Duke Energy Foundation · United Way of Greater Charlotte Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Alex Hemby Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph