Skip to content

· Private foundation

Alberto & Maria T Luzarraga Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$103k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$369kHuman Services$43kInternational$43kEducation$29kHousing & Shelter$29kHealth$19kCivil Rights$11kArts & Culture$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $53k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$644k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CARMEL OF JESUS MARY & JOSEPH$10,000
MONISTARY OF OUR LADY OF THE ROSARY$10,000
MATER ECLIASIAL FUND FOR VOCATION$10,000
LASALLE EDUCATIONAL CENTER$10,000
OUR LADY OF SOLITUDE MONASTERY$10,000
SEVERAL SOURCES SHELTER$5,000
ST MARTIN DE PORRES CHURCH$5,000
SALESIAN MISSIONS$5,000
PRIESTS FOR LIFE$5,000
FRANCISCAN FRIARS OF THE RENEW$5,000
THE DISCALCED HERMITS OF MT CARMEL$5,000
XAVIER SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND$5,000
HUMAN LIFE INT'L$5,000
GOOD COUNSEL$5,000
MISSIONAIRIES OF CHARITY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BOYS TOWN: $2k → 12%GOOD COUNSEL: $5k → 11%GOOD COUNSEL INC: $2k → 14%BOYS TOWN: $1k → 12%GOOD COUNSEL: $5k → 11%GOOD COUNSEL INC: $2k → 14%GOOD COUNSEL: $5k → 11%GOOD COUNSEL INC: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
NE
VA
AZ
TN
DC
MS
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$540k · 38 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +15% since the first grant, against -13% for those funded once.

38 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
16

Total granted

$540k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
-13%

Still filing today

37%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
InternationalReligionHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HL
    HUMAN LIFE INTERNATIONAL INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $39k · revenue +87%
  • ME
    MATER ECCLESIAE FUND FOR VOCATIONS INC
    5× · 2017–2025 · $25k · revenue +386%
  • GC
    GOOD COUNSEL INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $21k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • OL
    OUR LADY OF THE ROSARY
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • FM
    FRANCISCAN MISSIONS
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Living His Life Abundantly International

To inform, instruct and inspire people through the media about the sacred scriptures and teachings of the roman catholic church

Religion
2
Catholic Answers Inc

Catholic answers is an apostolate dedicated to serving christ by bringing the fullness of catholic truth to the world. we help good catholics become better catholics, bring former catholics home, and lead non-catholics into the fullness of…

—
3
Catholics for Choice

Catholics for Choice - which serves the pro-choice Catholic majority - encounters, educates, and emboldens people of faith who support reproductive freedom. Catholics for Choice believes healthcare is a human right and that includes access…

Civil Rights
4
Action for Life Inc

Action for life promotes, upholds, and supports efforts to protect the sanctity of life from conception to natural death through education, advocacy, and prayer as well as by supporting traditional family values.

Civil Rights
5
Pro-Life Action League Inc

Dissemination of pro-life information

Civil Rights
6
Save a Life International Inc

Save a life international helps women in crisis; including crisis pregnancies, domestic violence, post-abortion depression and other types of hardships. they provide education and bring awareness to young people about the importance of…

Human Services
7
Life International

To partner with leaders globally to boldly proclaim the biblical truth of the father's heart for life, champion the gospel of jesus christ, and establish life-giving ministries.

Health
8
Our Sunday Visitor Inc

Our sunday visitor's mission is to serve the church by providing catholics with materials that will strengthen their relationship with christ, deepen their commitment to the church and help them to see the world through the eyes of faith.

Religion
9
Pro-Life Wisconsin Inc

Defend the right to life of all citizens of our state, whether born or preborn, young, old, disabled, or terminally ill. we affirm that the right to life exists at the moment of fertilization and extends until natural death.

—
10
New Life Solutions Inc

To protect the unborn, share the gospel, and transform our communities one life at a time.

Health
11
Live Action

Live Action exists to defend the human rights of the most vulnerable: preborn children. Through educational media campaigns, visual storytelling, and investigative reporting, Live Action works to change hearts and minds about abortion and…

Civil Rights
12
A Choice for Life Inc

Bsideu for life is committed to presenting the gospel of our lord in word and deed by educating women facing crisis pregnancies, responding to their needs and protecting the lives of unborn children.bsideu for life also equips mothers and…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Students for Life of America Inc; the most unlike its peers is Camagueyanos Catolicos Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SALESIAN MISSIONS INC: $43,000 · OtherSALESIAN MISSIONS INCSEVERAL SOURCES SHELTERS INC: $34,500 · OtherSEVERAL SOURCES SHELTERS INCLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $33,000 · OtherLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POORMISSIONARIES OF CHARITY INC: $32,000 · OtherMISSIONARIES OF CHARITY INCFRANCISCAN FRIARS OF THE RENEW: $21,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherCENTRAL EDUCATIVO SJB DE LA SALLE: $18,500 · OtherOUR LADY OF SOLITUDE MONASTERY INC: $17,000 · OtherCARMEL OF JESUS MARY & JOSEPH: $17,000 · OtherST MARTIN DE PORRES CHURCH: $16,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherMONASTERY OF OUR LADY OF THE ROSARY: $15,000 · Other+34 more: $163,135 · Other+34 moreHUMAN LIFE INTERNATIONAL INC: $39,000 · InternationalCHILDREN INCORPORATED: $4,000 · International+1 more: $500 · InternationalPRIESTS FOR LIFE: $42,000 · Youth DevelopmentMATER ECCLESIAE FUND FOR VOCATIONS INC: $24,500 · ReligionKNOM Radio Mission Inc: $6,000 · ReligionGOOD COUNSEL INC: $21,000 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $3,000 · Human ServicesStudents for Life of America Inc: $5,000 · Civil RightsTHOMAS MORE SOCIETY: $4,000 · Crime & LegalSusan B Anthony List Inc: $1,000 · Education
Other$445,135International$43,500Youth Development$42,000Religion$30,500Human Services$24,000Civil Rights$5,000Crime & Legal$4,000Education$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPRIESTS FOR LIFE: $42,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHUMAN LIFE INTERNATIONAL INC: $39,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetSEVERAL SOURCES SHELTERS INC: $34,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetMATER ECCLESIAE FUND FOR VOCATIONS INC: $24,500 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetGOOD COUNSEL INC: $21,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetXAVIER SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND: $12,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetKNOM Radio Mission Inc: $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetStudents for Life of America Inc: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN INCORPORATED: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOUR HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHOMAS MORE SOCIETY: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSusan B Anthony List Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOne Peter Five Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PRIESTS FOR LIFE ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN LIFE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SEVERAL SOURCES SHELTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds MATER ECCLESIAE FUND FOR VOCATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds GOOD COUNSEL INC ↗
  • Who funds XAVIER SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds KNOM Radio Mission Inc ↗
  • Who funds CAMAGUEYANOS CATOLICOS INC ↗
  • Who funds Students for Life of America Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds OUR HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS MORE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fifth Station Foundation IncNJ17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fifth Station Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alberto & Maria T Luzarraga Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alberto & Maria T Luzarraga Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    6get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Alberto & Maria T Luzarraga’s filings →

    More from the funding graph