Skip to content

· Private foundation

Alberini Family Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$468k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$211k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.0MReligion$230kInternational$216kCivil Rights$122kEnvironment$82kHealth$77kArts & Culture$50kCrime & Legal$50kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $63k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $400k
$81,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$9.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE BUCKLEY SCHOOL$211,100
THE SOCIETY OF SAINT PIUS X FOREIGN MISSIONS TRUST$107,700
UC DAVIS DEVAR FOUNDATION$81,000
THE MARINA COUNSELING CENTER$48,000
TEMPLE ISRAEL OF HOLLYWOOD$15,000
THE PACKER COLLEGIATE INSTITUTE$5,182
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 8 repeat orgs$510k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +10% since the first grant, against -6% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
15

Total granted

$1.4M
$447k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
-6%

Still filing today

88%
93%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $63k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
InternationalEducationHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    THE BUCKLEY SCHOOL
    4× · 2021–2024 · $708k · revenue +45%
  • TS
    THE SOCIETY OF SAINT PIUS X FOREIGN MISSIONS TRUST
    2× · 2022–2024 · $215k · revenue +16%
  • TU
    THE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $135k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • LA
    LATIN AMERICAN LEADERSHIP ACADEMY
    one grant, 2023 · $62k
  • PC
    PALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $60k · revenue +32%
  • BH
    BEVERLY HILLS POLICE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
2
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
3
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
4
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
5
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
6
Uc Riverside Foundation

To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.

Education
7
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
8
The California Medical Innovations Institute Inc

The Institute is a scientific research center dedicated to conducting basic and applied research to advance the understanding of human disease and the improvement of human health. The Institute fosters an innovative research environment…

Education
9
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
10
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
11
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
12
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Global Fund for Women Inc; the most unlike its peers is Marina Counseling Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
11/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE BUCKLEY SCHOOL: $708,200 · OtherTHE BUCKLEY SCHOOLUC DAVIS DEVAR FOUNDATION: $153,000 · OtherUC DAVIS DEVAR FOUNDATIONLATIN AMERICAN LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: $62,000 · OtherLATIN AMERICAN LEADERSHIP ACADEMYBEVERLY HILLS POLICE FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Other+3 more: $36,000 · OtherWORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE: $62,000 · InternationalWORLD RESOURCES INST…GLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC: $60,000 · InternationalGLOBAL FUND FOR WOME…PALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND: $60,000 · InternationalPALESTINE CHILDREN'S…HIAS INC: $41,000 · InternationalHIAS INCWomen for Afghan Women Inc: $30,000 · InternationalWomen for Afghan Wom…UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $30,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND F…GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · InternationalGLOBALGIVING FOUNDAT…DIRECT RELIEF: $20,000 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEF+1 more: $10,000 · InternationalTHE SOCIETY OF SAINT PIUS X FOREIGN MISSIONS TRUST: $215,400 · ReligionTHE SOCIETY …THE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION: $135,000 · EducationTHE UC DA…SAINT MARY'S COLLEGE OF CALIFORNIA: $20,000 · EducationSAINT MAR…PACKER COLLEGIATE INSTITUTE: $8,274 · EducationMarina Counseling Center: $48,000 · HealthCENTER FOR DISEASE DYNAMICS ECONOMICS & POLICY INC: $25,000 · Health+1 more: $2,500 · HealthACADEMY MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Arts & CultureCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $40,000 · Human Services
Other$1,009,200International$338,000Religion$215,400Education$163,274Health$75,500Arts & Culture$50,000Human Services$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BUCKLEY SCHOOL: $708,200 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetTHE SOCIETY OF SAINT PIUS X FOREIGN MISSIONS TRUST: $215,400 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetTHE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION: $135,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE: $62,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC: $60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND: $60,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBEVERLY HILLS POLICE FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetACADEMY MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMarina Counseling Center: $48,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetHIAS INC: $41,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $40,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWomen for Afghan Women Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR DISEASE DYNAMICS ECONOMICS & POLICY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAINT MARY'S COLLEGE OF CALIFORNIA: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKISS THE GROUND: $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPACKER COLLEGIATE INSTITUTE: $8,274 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF OREGON AND SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Orthodox Womens Medical Association Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY10.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alberini Family Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alberini Family Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 88%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Center for Disease Dynamics Economics & Policy Inc: 16% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Alberini Family Fund?

Find your warmest path to Alberini Family Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Alberini Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph