Skip to content
Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium

Optimizing health and well-being through collaborative partnerships and services.

$33M
Granted FY2025still arriving
75
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$3.1M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$194MEnvironment$54MHuman Services$21MHousing & Shelter$4.0MCommunity Improvement$1.8MArts & Culture$1.6MEducation$1.5MCivil Rights$1.2MOther$0
02FY2025 · 75 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 75 grants below total $28,457,979, the rows itemized in this filing. The $32,926,232 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $4,468,253 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $392k
  • $50k–250k33 grants · $3.7M
  • $250k+23 grants · $24M
$96,028
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.4B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTHCENTRAL FOUNDATION$3,129,512
DENA NENA HENASH DBA TANANA CHIEFS CONFERENCE$2,593,535
YUKON KUSKOKWIM HEALTH CORP$1,637,683
KENAITZE INDIAN TRIBE$1,600,619
CHUGACHMIUT$1,514,184
KODIAK AREA NATIVE ASSOCIATION$1,298,776
NATIVE VILLAGE OF EYAK$1,157,062
SOUTH EAST ALASKA REGIONAL HEALTH CONSORTIUM$1,113,993
BRISTOL BAY AREA HEALTH CORPORATION$1,049,077
NORTON SOUND HEALTH CORPORATION$1,011,348
YAKUTAT COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER$977,885
ARCTIC SLOPE NATIVE ASSOCIATION$897,849
SELDOVIA VILLAGE TRIBE$869,415
NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH$866,975
ALEUTIAN PRIBILOF ISLANDS ASSOCIATION INC$857,921
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $42.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 61% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HEALTH NATIVE COMMUNITIES PARTNERSHIP INCORPORATED: $38k → 22%SMALL TRIBES ORGANIZATION OF WESTERN WASHINGTON: $172k → 9%HEALTH NATIVE COMMUNITIES PARTNERSHIP INCORPORATED: $16k → 22%SMALL TRIBES ORGANIZATION OF WESTERN WASHINGTON: $108k → 9%SMALL TRIBES ORGANIZATION OF WESTERN WASHINGTON: $70k → 9%YAKUTAT TLINGIT TRIBE: $23k → 12%Yukon Kuskokwim Health Corporation: $1.7M → 22%YAKUTAT TLINGIT TRIBE: $7k → 12%MANIILAQ ASSOCIATION: $2.8M → 20%KODIAK AREA NATIVE ASSOCIATION: $7.1M → 8%Kenaitze Indian Tribe: $740k → 11%MANIILAQ ASSOCIATION: $1.6M → 20%KODIAK AREA NATIVE ASSOCIATION: $2.2M → 8%MANIILAQ ASSOCIATION: $1.4M → 20%KODIAK AREA NATIVE ASSOCIATION: $1.8M → 8%Maniilaq Association: $1.0M → 20%KODIAK AREA NATIVE ASSOCIATION: $1.6M → 8%Maniilaq Association: $957k → 20%KODIAK AREA NATIVE ASSOCIATION: $1.4M → 8%MANIILAQ ASSOCIATION: $891k → 20%KODIAK AREA NATIVE ASSOCIATION: $1.3M → 8%MANIILAQ ASSOCIATION: $824k → 20%Kodiak Area Native Association: $803k → 8%Maniilaq Association: $559k → 20%Kodiak Area Native Association: $629k → 8%Copper River Native Association: $127k → 14%March of Dimes: $8k → 22%COVENANT HOUSE: $13k → 10%CHUGACHMIUT: $2.0M → 10%CHUGACHMIUT: $1.6M → 10%CHUGACHMIUT: $1.5M → 10%CHUGACHMIUT: $1.4M → 10%CHUGACHMIUT: $1.3M → 10%Chugachmiut: $1.2M → 10%CHUGACHMIUT: $1.2M → 10%Chugachmiut: $1.2M → 10%Chugachmiut: $1.2M → 10%CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES: $62k → 10%CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES: $28k → 10%COOK INLET TRIBAL COUNCIL INC: $25k → 10%Cook Inlet Tribal Council: $25k → 10%COOK INLET TRIBAL COUNCIL INC: $25k → 10%Cook Inlet Tribal Council: $20k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WA
MN
IL
MA
OR
CA
CO
KY
VA
NM
DC
OK
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$296M · 92 repeat orgs$15M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +47% for those funded once.

92 repeat relationships: 63 still active in FY2025, 29 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

92
65

Total granted

$296M
$15M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+47%

Still filing today

40%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $330k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    Southcentral Foundation
    9× · 2017–2025 · $26M · revenue +118%
  • TC
    Tanana Chiefs Conference
    9× · 2017–2025 · $19M · revenue +16%
  • KA
    Kodiak Area Native Association
    9× · 2017–2025 · $18M · revenue +109%

Funded once

  • SI
    STAR INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $6.7M · revenue +47%
  • SA
    SEWARD ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MARINE SCIENCEgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $2.5M · revenue +73% · 35% of their budget
  • KC
    Klawock Cooperative Association
    one grant, 2019 · $942k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium

Optimizing health and well-being through collaborative partnerships and services.

Health
2
Alaska Nannut Co-Management Council

The alaska nannut co-management council (ancc) was established to represent the collective alaska native voice in polar bear co-management. ancc is a tribally authorized organization with membership consisting of the 15 tribes in alaska…

Animals
3
Alaska Historical Publication Association
Education
4
Alaska Rural Electric Cooperative Association Educational Foundation Inc
Environment
5
Alaska Hospital & Healthcare Association

The Alaska Hospital & Healthcare Association (AHHA) is a non-profit trade association representing more than 65 hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, home health agencies, and other healthcare partners.Our members are distributed across…

—
6
Inuit Circumpolar Council-Alaska

Icc alaska exists as the unified voice and collective spirit of alaskan inuit, to promote, protect and advance inuit culture and society.

Arts & Culture
7
Iliuliuk Family & Health Services

To provide comprehensive medical, dental, and behavioral health care through the operation of its clinic in Unalaska, Alaska. The clinic's mission is to provide care to all, regardless of ability to pay, and to specialize in providing care…

Health
8
Ahtna Intertribal Resource Commission

The core purpose of AITRC is "traditional resource stewardship." The core values are "survival; protect and enhance subsistence resources; and partnerships." The vision statement is "our way of life and cultural tradition is unified and…

Environment
9
Northern Alaska Environmental Center

Since 1971, the northern alaska environmental center has promoted environmental conservation and sustainable resource stewardship in interior and arctic alaska through education and advocacy.

Environment
10
Healing Native Hearts Coalition

A tribal domestic violence coalition for the interior tribes of alaska. providing support and referral services for tribal governments and victims of domestic violence and sexual assault.

Health
11
The Aleut Foundation
Education
12
Qutekcak Native Tribe

Qutekcak native Tribe was created to promote the unity, self-determination and empowerment on the native population residing in Seward, Alaska and the surrounding areas.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arctic Slope Native Association; the most unlike its peers is Shaktoolik Native Store Native Village of Shaktoolik. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 170 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
58/60
Grantees still filing
43/60
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF KOTZEBUE: $20,736,122 · OtherCITY OF KOTZEBUEState Of Alaska: $20,558,460 · OtherState Of AlaskaYUKON-KUSKOKWIM HEALTH CORPORATION: $16,473,814 · OtherYUKON-KUSKOKWIM HEALTH CORPORATIONKETCHIKAN INDIAN CORPORATION: $8,788,406 · OtherKETCHIKAN INDIAN CORPORATIONCITY OF HOONAH: $8,428,836 · OtherCITY OF HOONAHKENAITZE INDIAN TRIBE: $8,286,470 · OtherKENAITZE INDIAN TRIBEARCTIC SLOPE NATIVE ASSOCIATION: $7,087,634 · OtherSTAR INC: $6,749,521 · OtherCopper River Native Association Inc: $5,358,752 · OtherANNETTE ISLAND SERVICE UNIT: $4,992,981 · Other+124 more: $39,163,874 · Other+124 moreSouthcentral Foundation: $26,408,020 · HealthSouthcentral FoundationTanana Chiefs Conference: $19,205,065 · HealthTanana Chiefs ConferenceSOUTHEAST ALASKA REGIONAL HEALTH CONSORTIUM: $17,659,620 · HealthSOUTHEAST ALASKA REGIONAL HEALTH CONSO…Bristol Bay Area Health Corporation: $16,636,323 · HealthBristol Bay Area Health CorporationNORTON SOUND HEALTH CORPORATION: $13,541,947 · HealthNORTON SOUND HEALTH CORPORATIONHEALTHY ALASKA NATIVES FOUNDATION: $12,595,022 · HealthHEALTHY ALASKA NATIVES FOUNDATION+8 more: $401,735 · HealthKodiak Area Native Association: $17,775,991 · Human ServicesKodiak Area Nat…CHUGACHMIUT: $12,800,940 · Human ServicesCHUGACHMIUTManiilaq Association: $9,114,590 · Human ServicesManiilaq Associ…THE YAKUTAT TLINGIT TRIBE NONPROFIT: $1,722,371 · Human Services+6 more: $1,511,842 · Human ServicesALEUTIAN PRIBILOF ISLANDS ASSOCIATION INC: $8,192,236 · Community ImprovementRURAL ALASKA COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM: $1,162,214 · Community Improvement+2 more: $139,756 · Community ImprovementSEWARD ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MARINE SCIENCE: $2,549,583 · AnimalsEastern Aleutian Tribes Inc: $1,481,719 · EducationAlaska Pacific University: $582,128 · EducationALASKA SCHOOL ACTIVITIES ASSN INC: $100,000 · Education+3 more: $124,735 · EducationFood Bank of Alaska: $504,115 · Food & Nutrition
Other$146,624,870Health$106,447,732Human Services$42,925,734Community Improvement$9,494,206Animals$2,549,583Education$2,288,582Food & Nutrition$504,115

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSouthcentral Foundation: $26,408,020 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetTanana Chiefs Conference: $19,205,065 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetKodiak Area Native Association: $17,775,991 over 9y, 15% of budgetSOUTHEAST ALASKA REGIONAL HEALTH CONSORTIUM: $17,659,620 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetBristol Bay Area Health Corporation: $16,636,323 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetNORTON SOUND HEALTH CORPORATION: $13,541,947 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetCHUGACHMIUT: $12,800,940 over 9y, 7.2% of budgetHEALTHY ALASKA NATIVES FOUNDATION: $12,595,022 over 7y, 95% of budgetManiilaq Association: $9,114,590 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetALEUTIAN PRIBILOF ISLANDS ASSOCIATION INC: $8,192,236 over 9y, 6.0% of budgetARCTIC SLOPE NATIVE ASSOCIATION: $7,087,634 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetCopper River Native Association Inc: $5,358,752 over 9y, 7.2% of budgetALASKA NATIVE HEALTH BOARD: $2,552,411 over 8y, 40% of budgetSEWARD ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MARINE SCIENCE: $2,549,583 over 1y, 35% of budgetTHE YAKUTAT TLINGIT TRIBE NONPROFIT: $1,722,371 over 3y, 47% of budgetEastern Aleutian Tribes Inc: $1,481,719 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetRURAL ALASKA COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM: $1,162,214 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetAlaska Pacific University: $582,128 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetFood Bank of Alaska: $504,115 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSmall Tribes Organization of Western Washington: $349,184 over 3y, 10% of budgetCook Inlet Tribal Council: $221,968 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetNORTHWEST PORTLAND AREA INDIAN HEALTH BOARD: $210,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetValdez Native Tribe: $195,464 over 4y, 7.6% of budgetALASKA SCHOOL ACTIVITIES ASSN INC: $100,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetCatholic Social Services: $90,415 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFIRST ALASKANS INSTITUTE: $85,717 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetAlaska Special Olympics DBA Special Olympics Alaska Inc: $75,990 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetPublic Health Institute: $58,900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE ALASKA: $56,695 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNORTHWEST INDIAN COLLEGE: $55,808 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNuvista Light & Electric Cooperative Inc: $54,039 over 2y, 20% of budgetAlaska Village Electric Cooperative Inc: $52,222 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCold Climate Housing Research Center: $49,404 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetUniversity of Kentucky Research Foundation: $49,029 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Alaska Community Foundation: $38,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetALASKA FEDERATION OF NATIVES: $37,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWHITE MOUNTAIN NATIVE STORE NATIVE VILLAGE OF WHITE MOUNTAIN: $36,101 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetBUCKLAND NATIVE STORE NATIVE VILLAGE OF BUCKLAND: $32,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $30,577 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAlaska Native Heritage Center Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $27,758 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSouthern Plains Tribal Health Board Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL INDIAN HEALTH BOARD: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCAMP FIRE ALASKA: $21,384 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $19,898 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $19,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAnchorage Neighborhood Housing Services Inc: $15,720 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Southcentral Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Tanana Chiefs Conference ↗
  • Who funds Kodiak Area Native Association ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHEAST ALASKA REGIONAL HEALTH CONSORTIUM ↗
  • Who funds Bristol Bay Area Health Corporation ↗
  • Who funds NORTON SOUND HEALTH CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CHUGACHMIUT ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHY ALASKA NATIVES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Maniilaq Association ↗
  • Who funds ALEUTIAN PRIBILOF ISLANDS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ARCTIC SLOPE NATIVE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds STAR INC ↗
  • Who funds Copper River Native Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALASKA NATIVE HEALTH BOARD ↗
  • Who funds SEWARD ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MARINE SCIENCE ↗
  • Who funds THE YAKUTAT TLINGIT TRIBE NONPROFIT ↗
  • Who funds Eastern Aleutian Tribes Inc ↗
  • Who funds RURAL ALASKA COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds ANCHORAGE HOSPICE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Alaska Community …Rasmuson FoundationFirst Nations Develop…Alaska Children's Tru…Alaska Conservation F…Valley Hospital Assoc…First Alaskans Instit…Cook Inlet Tribal Cou…Tanana Chiefs Confere…Southcentral Foundati…Rural Alaska Communit…Coastal Villages Regi…
The Alaska Community FoundationAK83.5× affinity51 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Alaska Community Foundation · Rasmuson Foundation · First Nations Development Institute · Alaska Children's Trust · Alaska Conservation Foundation · Valley Hospital Association Inc Dba Mat-Su Health Foundation · First Alaskans Institute · Cook Inlet Tribal Council · Tanana Chiefs Conference · Southcentral Foundation · Rural Alaska Community Action Program Foundation · Coastal Villages Region Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 70%
  • Southern Plains Tribal Health Board Foundation: 83% of income from government
  • Northwest Portland Area Indian Health Board: 70% of income from government
  • Medstar Health Research Institute Inc: 25% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 170 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home