· Public charity
Southcentral Foundation
Southcentral Foundation (SCF) was incorporated as a nonprofit organization under Alaska state law in 1982.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 16 grants below total $1,992,514 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,595,298 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,602,784 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k4 grants · $82k
- $50k–250k10 grants · $1.2M
- $250k+2 grants · $747k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| F5 Project Inc | $405,381 |
| University of Washington | $341,280 |
| Cook Inlet Tribal Council Inc | $191,806 |
| James River Correctional Cent | $160,715 |
| University of Alaska Anchorag | $153,605 |
| University of Alaska Fairbank | $137,757 |
| Northern Arizona University | $118,462 |
| University of Arkansas | $98,071 |
| Regents of the University of | $85,780 |
| Stone Soup Group | $83,398 |
| Mayo Clinic | $81,345 |
| Washington State University | $53,275 |
| Alaska Pacific University | $33,195 |
| University of Montana | $25,892 |
| University of New Mexico | $12,456 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
17 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $161k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CICook Inlet Tribal Council3× · 2017–2024 · $680k · revenue +69%
- AWABUSED WOMEN'S AID IN CRISIS INC6× · 2017–2023 · $413k · revenue +18%
- APAlaska Pacific University8× · 2017–2024 · $292k · revenue +57%
Funded once
- ANALASKA NATIVE TRIBAL HEALTH CONSORTIUMgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $33M · revenue +75%
- TGTribal Government of St Paul Islandone grant, 2017 · $1.3M
- ACALASKA CARESone grant, 2017 · $300k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Alaska Hospital & Healthcare Association (AHHA) is a non-profit trade association representing more than 65 hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, home health agencies, and other healthcare partners.Our members are distributed across…
The mission of the alaska native health board is to promote the spiritual, physical, mental, social, and cultural well-being and pride of alaska native people.
To provide high-quality, affordable health care services to improve the health of our members and the communities we serve.
Seattle children's healthcare system (schs) is engaged in activities relating to the provision of health care services to infants, children, and adolescents, delivering and improving the delivery and the quality of those services through…
To work collaboratively toward a common vision that alaska natives are the healthiest people in the world, improve lives, and inspire good health.
Kapi'olani medical specialists (dba hawai'i pacific health medical group) is a multispecialty provider group dedicated to providing world-class care for adults and children across hawai'i and the pacific region working in partnership with…
Strengthening the community by providing accessible and affordable health care.
To provide alaska community health centers and other primary care safety net providers with training and technical assistance so they can deliver high quality health care to patients. to assist alaskans in discovering and pursuing health…
Kaua'i medical clinic, an affliate of hawai'i pacific health, is a multi-specialty clinic dedicated to providing world-class care for adults and children across hawai'i and the pacific region in partnership with kapi'olani medical center…
The greater fairbanks community hospital foundation was established toensure that we never again face the prospect of a community without health care by: 1) providing first-class medical facilities and technology 2) overseeing an excellent…
We provide a comprehensive, co occurring disorder-capable, community behavioral health center. we provide quality care using best practices designed to promote health, wellness, self-determination, and recovery. the service area is the…
The organization operates primarily on the Southern Kenai Peninsula and its operations include the following:Community Mental Health - Counseling, evaluation, consultation and crisis mental health services for Adults and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium and the most unlike its peers is F5 Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ALASKA NATIVE TRIBAL HEALTH CONSORTIUM ↗
- Who funds F5 PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Cook Inlet Tribal Council ↗
- Who funds ABUSED WOMEN'S AID IN CRISIS INC ↗
- Who funds Alaska Pacific University ↗
- Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
- Who funds STONE SOUP GROUP ↗
- Who funds KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium · The Alaska Community Foundation · Valley Hospital Association Inc Dba Mat-Su Health Foundation · First Nations Development Institute · American Heart Association Inc · Cook Inlet Tribal Council · Rasmuson Foundation · Alaska Conservation Foundation · World Learning Inc · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · American Cancer Society Inc · Johns Hopkins University
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Southcentral Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.