· Private foundation
Alan D and Susan Lewis Solomont Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 58% of ALAN D AND SUSAN LEWIS SOLOMONT FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k44 grants · $70k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TRUSTEES OF TUFTS COLLEGE | $25,000 |
| BERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC | $10,000 |
| TEMPLE BETH ELOHIM | $10,000 |
| UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MUSEUM | $6,800 |
| TRUSTEES OF TUFTS COLLEGE | $5,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FDN | $5,000 |
| NEW ISRAEL FUND | $5,000 |
| T'RUAH | $5,000 |
| UMASS LOWELL | $5,000 |
| TEMPLE BETH ELOHIM | $3,650 |
| MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS BOSTON | $3,000 |
| HELPING OUR WOMEN | $2,500 |
| KENNEDY PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| HEBREW SENIOR LIFE | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
57 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2024, 29 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Trustees of Tufts College6× · 2019–2024 · $136k · revenue +26%- JSJ STREET EDUCATION FUND INC3× · 2019–2021 · $66k · revenue +30%
- BCBERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC INC6× · 2019–2024 · $46k · revenue +31%
Funded once
THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +49%- MIMASS INCone grant, 2022 · $10k
- ACATLANTIC COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES INCone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +3%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
The manhattan institute is a community of scholars, journalists, activists, and civic leaders dedicated to advancing opportunity, individual liberty, and the rule of law in america and its great cities.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…
The mission of the roundtable is to make massachusetts the most desirable place to live, work and do business by engaging private sector executives and public leaders to ensure access to a robust, diverse and talented workforce that…
Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…
Macp's stated mission is to promote job stabilization and growth across the full spectrum of business, and within all geographic regions of the commonwealth through working in partnership with business and government. macp's main priority…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Catalyst Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
91 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 91 of the 143 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
- Who funds J STREET EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds BERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC INC ↗
- Who funds J STREET ↗
- Who funds JOHN FITZGERALD KENNEDY LIBRARY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC ↗
- Who funds BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Hebrew Senior Life Inc ↗
- Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS ↗
- Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
- Who funds ATLANTIC COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES INC ↗
- Who funds THE ALLIANCE FOR BUSINESS LEADERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds Terezin Music Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds SparkShare Inc ↗
- Who funds T'RUAH ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL OF AMERICAN AMBASSADORS ↗
- Who funds HELPING OUR WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds Boston Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF METROWEST INC ↗
- Who funds THE LOCAL JOURNALISM PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds INVERSANT INC ↗
- Who funds HOFFMAN INSTITUTE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Foreign Policy For America ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds THE FINCA VIGIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Yawkey Foundation II · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · Highland Street Connection and Subsidiaries · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Robert L Epstein Family Foundation · Topol Family Foundation Inc · Lebowitz-Aberly Family Foundation · The Fish Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Alan D and Susan Lewis Solomont Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Partakers Inc — 59% of income from government
- Utec Inc — 46% of income from government
- Museum of African American History Inc — 43% of income from government
- The Finca Vigia Foundation Inc — 39% of income from government
- College for Social Innovation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Judge Baker Children's Center — 29% of income from government
- Fine Arts Work Center in Provincetown Inc — 27% of income from government
- Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
- Horizons for Homeless Children — 21% of income from government
- Community Catalyst Inc — 15% of income from government
- Helping Our Women Inc — 14% of income from government
- Jewish Alliance for Law and Social Action Inc — 13% of income from government
- Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
- New England Aquarium Corporation — 12% of income from government
- Silent Spring Institute Inc — 12% of income from government
- La Vida Inc — 11% of income from government
- The Wang Center for the Performing Arts Inc — 10% of income from government
- Reach Out and Read Inc — 9% of income from government
- Arts & Business Council of Greater Boston Inc — 8% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Rogerson Communities Inc — 6% of income from government
- Huntington Theatre Co Inc — 4% of income from government
- 826 Boston Inc — 3% of income from government
- Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
- Artists for Humanity Inc — 2% of income from government
- Lower Cape Cod Community Develop- Ment Corporation — 1% of income from government
- Berklee College of Music Inc — 1% of income from government
- Emerald Necklace Conservancy Inc — 0% of income from government
- Hebrew Senior Life Inc — 0% of income from government
- Keshet Inc — 0% of income from government
- Boston Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.