Skip to content

· Private foundation

Alan & Susan Binette Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$20k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$210kHuman Services$46kEducation$36kCrime & Legal$14kPhilanthropy$5kEnvironment$4kFood & Nutrition$3kReligion$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,300
Median grant
2
States reached
$184k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PHOENIX HIGH SCHOOL$6,000
ACCESS$5,000
MEDFORD CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH$3,000
AMAHORO CHILDREN COMMUNITY TEAM$2,300
JACKSON COUNTY SART$2,000
HEARTS WITH A MISSION$1,000
TRAGEDY TO TRUMPH FOUNDATION$500
WATER WATCH$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HEARTS WITH A MISSION: $1k → 13%HEARTS WITH A MISSION: $1k → 13%HEARTS WITH A MISSION: $1k → 13%HEARTS WITH A MISSION: $1k → 13%HEARTS WITH A MISSION: $1k → 13%HEARTS WITH A MISSION: $500 → 13%HEARTS WITH A MISSION: $500 → 13%HEARTS WITH A MISSION: $500 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$316k · 8 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
2

Total granted

$316k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+138%
+138%

Still filing today

50%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ASANTE FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2023 · $209k · revenue +36%
  • A
    ACCESS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $39k · revenue +232%
  • HW
    HEARTS WITH A MISSION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $7k · revenue +138%

Funded once

  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue -79%
  • TF
    THE FAMILY NURTURING CENTER ROGUE VALLEY CHILDREN'S RELIEF NURSERYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue +138%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Asante

Asante exists to provide quality healthcare services in a compassionate manner, valued by the communities we serve.

Health
2
Asante Physician Partners

Asante physician partners is a multi-specialty provider group, with approximately 400 providers, that is headquartered in medford, oregon, and has 25 clinic locations in southern oregon. asante physician partners was established for the…

Health
3
Rogue Climate

Rogue Climate's mission is to empower Southern Oregon communities most impacted by climate change including low-income, rural, youth, seniors & communities of color, to win climate justice by organizing for clean energy, sustainable jobs &…

Education
4
Oregon Agricultural Trust

Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.

Environment
5
Oregon Justice Network

Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…

Human Services
6
Family Forward Oregon

We work collectively to educate and advocate for systems that elevate the vital work of care and caregiving in its many forms within our community.

Human Services
7
Jackson County Casa

Casa is a unique non-profit helping abused and neglected children in the jackson county family court system. our team of trained volunteers,staff case supervisors, and staff attorneys allow each child to be represented in a court of law…

Civil Rights
8
The Arc Oregon

The arc of oregon, together with its network of members and affiliated chapters, advocates for the rights and full community participation of all children and adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

—
9
Sage Advocacy Center

Educate, advocate, and empower to end violence.

—
10
Access Reproductive Care - Southeast

Provide funding and logistical support to ensure southerners receive safe and compassionate reproductive care including abortion services. through education and leadership development we build power in communities of color to abolish…

Environment
11
Options Pregnancy Resource Centers Inc

Empowering life-affirming decisions

Health
12
Alaska Childrens Alliance

Dedicated to strengthening the multi-disciplinary response to child abuse. We strive to ensure that professionals throughout Alaska are equipped to do the best job possible at holding offenders accountable and helping children and families…

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Asante Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Tragedy to Triumph Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ASANTE FOUNDATION: $208,500 · HealthASANTE FOUNDATIONJACKSON COUNTY SART: $14,000 · HealthJACKSON COUNTY SART+2 more: $1,555 · HealthACCESS: $39,000 · OtherACCESSPHOENIX HIGH SCHOOL: $36,000 · OtherPHOENIX HIGH SCHOOLUNITED WAY: $4,500 · OtherWATER WATCH: $4,000 · OtherMEDFORD CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH: $3,000 · OtherWORLD CENTER KITCHEN: $3,000 · OtherHEARTS WITH A MISSION: $6,500 · Human ServicesAmahoro Children & Community Team: $2,300 · InternationalTHE FAMILY NURTURING CENTER ROGUE VALLEY CHILDREN'S RELIEF NURSERY: $500 · Education
Health$224,055Other$89,500Human Services$6,500International$2,300Education$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetASANTE FOUNDATION: $208,500 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetACCESS: $39,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetJACKSON COUNTY SART: $14,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetHEARTS WITH A MISSION: $6,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAmahoro Children & Community Team: $2,300 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,055 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRAGEDY TO TRIUMPH FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ASANTE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS ↗
  • Who funds JACKSON COUNTY SART ↗
  • Who funds HEARTS WITH A MISSION ↗
  • Who funds Amahoro Children & Community Team ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds TRAGEDY TO TRIUMPH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE FAMILY NURTURING CENTER ROGUE VALLEY CHILDREN'S RELIEF NURSERY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Joe & Frances Naumes Family FoundationOR15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Joe & Frances Naumes Family Foundation · Carrico Family Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · Robert and Frances Chaney Family Foundation · Four Way Community Foundation · The Carpenter Foundation · The Avista Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Alan & Susan Binette Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Alan & Susan Binette Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 51%
  • Access: 65% of income from government
  • Hearts With a Mission: 51% of income from government
  • The Family Nurturing Center Rogue Valley Children's Relief Nursery: 38% of income from government
  • Jackson County Sart: 14% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Alan & Susan Binette Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Alan & Susan Binette Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Alan & Susan Binette’s filings →

More from the funding graph